Kingdon's Immigration Reform

743 Words2 Pages

The record-high unemployment rates in the United States, following the 2008 global financial crisis, led to major changes in public debate over immigration reform and, ultimately, to the enactment of immigration reform policies on the state levels across the country. Using Kingdon’s “Three Streams” and Baumgartner and Jones’ Venue-Shopping theories, this paper will discuss the policy-related impacts of the crisis on U.S. immigration reform.
According to Kingdon (2011), policy change often occurs at the convergence of the three main streams of the policymaking process: problem, policy, and politics. The problem stream refers to the issue or the policy problem that needs to be addressed; the policy stream presents the policy solutions that aim …show more content…

The Depression in the U.S. during the early 1920s and the economic downturn resulted from the Oil crisis in 1970s both witnessed major changes in the nation’s immigration policies.5 The 2008 crisis—the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression—can thus be expected to have significantly impacted our immigration policies. Although the immigrant population shrank as a large number of immigrants had been employed in the sectors that were more affected with the current crisis, they were blamed for causing the continuous increase of unemployment rates and for the loss of jobs occurring across the country.6
In the post-2008 economic crisis, the issue of immigration reform has taken on a new sense of urgency. It had become a “problem.” Given the rise of unemployment rates and the decreased demand in labor force, immigrants became more dependent on policies that would help them overcome both the economic and social challenges facing them at the time. Local communities across the country, on the other hands, were begging for more restrictive policies to reduce undocumented immigrant population, and limit their access to state benefits.7 As a result, immigration reforms were pushed for, on both national and state …show more content…

This reflects the
3
responsiveness of the political stream, given the circumstances that did not allow them to move forward with any solution on a national level. Since 2008, immigration legislation made the policy agenda in all 50 states across the country, 46 of which enacted into their law into law a total of 240 immigration-related bills.9
Baumgartner and Jones (2013) would argue that the constant pressures from constituencies for either liberal or restrictive changes have understandably made political actors, including politicians and lobbyists, search for alternative venues to realize their policy aims. This is what they call the “Venue-shopping” strategy, which refers to the choices political actors make in choosing which decision-making body of the political structure they will pursue to promote their policy aims. The result is still immigration reform, though facilitated on the state-level and through the executive branch, instead of the legislative body of the

Open Document