King Lear as a Changed Character at the End of Shakespeare's Play

866 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critical comments on shakespeare's king lear

King Lear as a Changed Character at the End of Shakespeare's Play

Works Cited Missing

King Lear was written in 1605-1606, the exact date is unknown. It was

performed at the Globe theatre on 26 December 1606 and was first

published in 1608. The play was written by William Shakespeare who has

written 37 other plays for Elizabethan and Jacobean audiences. William

Shakespeare wrote the play for King James 1. King James had sons in

mind as heirs and not daughters and he might have thought it foolish

and stupid to have daughters as heir to the throne as it is in king

Lear. King Lear was written for the Jacobean audience.

There are two plots in King Lear, both plots are not linked at the

beginning but they link at the end when the characters in the two

plots get together. The two plots are the main plot and the sub plot.

The main plot is about Lear's madness and the sub plot is about

Gloucester, Edmund and Edgar the bastard. Edmund writes a letter that

he pretends is from his brother about how he wants all his fathers

money. He writes the letter because he wants his father to think he is

better than his brother and he wants all the money. He also wants his

father to fight and break up with his brother.

In Act1 Scene1 the 'love test' takes place. This is when Lear wants

his three daughters to confess who loves him the most to claim there

share of kingdom. Lear wanted to split his kingdom between his three

daughters. He expected himself to still be king but his daughters to

rule the kingdom whilst he does nothing. Lear knew his youngest

daughter Cordelia, who is kind, honest and sometimes naïve, was his

favourite and Cordelia loved Lear the most but he still wanted a love

test in which Cordelia says:

"I love you majesty according to my bond, no more nor less" (Cordelia)

Lear banishes Cordelia from the kingdom because he is vain and

selfish. He expects Cordelia to say the same as his other two

Show More
Related

  • Alais 'The Lion In Winter'

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    First power, amongst the royal family the mother, Eleanor is the Queen; the father is King Henry, the youngest son John, middle son Geoffrey, and oldest son Richard. In the play not one, but all of these characters have power in some kind of way. King Henry spent his life conquering many regions and wants to continue to conquer by passing king down to one of his three sons. A quote from the play that shows the greed that having power can create Henry asked, “Isn’t being chancellor power enough?” Geoffrey replies, “It’s not the power I feel deprived of. It’s the mention I miss.” Geoffrey does not think he will receive enough respect if he is just the chancellor and his younger brother John is king. When he comes to Richard, the oldest brother he thinks he should be king because of his army he has behind him, but this is where futility comes into play. It is not always about war and killing people to prove your powerful, but in Richards’s ways that is the only way. Richard says, “I am a constant soldier, a sometime poet, and I will be king.” This quote describes the type of person Richard wants to be, he wants to have all the power to rein over the castle and do it through war. Each of the family members is jealous of one another especially the children of the king and queen, it is pretty much a sibling rivalry between them. Having power can be a good thing or bad thing, in this situation the king and queens children have a different view on having power and what they would do if crowned

    Read More

  • Free Essay: Restructuring Relationships Shakespeare's King Lear

    889 Words  | 2 Pages

    The play of "King Lear" is about a search for personal identity. In the historical period in which this play is set, the social structure was set in order of things closest to Heaven. Therefore, on Earth, the king was at the top, followed by his noblemen and going all the way down to the basest of objects such as rocks and dirt. This structure was set up by the people, and by going by the premise that anything that is man made is imperfect, this system cannot exist for long without conflict.

    Read More

  • Self-Perception in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thou shall honour thy father and thy mother, is not only one of ten powerful commandments but is also the foundation for King Lear's perception of himself and his overwhelming situation in Shakespeare's masterpiece King Lear. After a recent life-altering decision, Lear's seemingly stable and comfortable world has been thrown into upheaval through the disobedience and lies told by not only his two daughters but also by his servants! Thus, after being dishonoured by his family and attendants, Lear forms an accurate perception of his situation, that he is "a man / More sinned against than sinning" (Act III scene ii lines 60 - 61).

    Read More

  • King George III

    445 Words  | 1 Pages

    George III inherited more than just the throne. He also had the royal hereditary disease

    Read More

  • Personal Identity And Love In Shakespeare's King Lear

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his kingdom Lear was practically a god, but he was a god that knew nothing of morals, humanity, personal identity, or love. Lear forces his daughters into open displays of verbal affection for the sole purpose of flattery. Lear’s self-centered mindset is amplified in his speeches to Cordelia after she refuses to participate with hyperbolic love. In his rage Lear says, “he that makes his generation messes / To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom / Be as well neighbored, pitied, and relived / As thou my sometime daughter” (I.i.130-134). Lear feels closer to Satan than his own daughter since the cannibal that feeds on his children is Lear himself. Lear’s daughters are reduced to the status of food; they do not exist beyond the feeding of his ego. Lear continues with his tirade as he proclaims “I loved her most and thought to set my rest / On her kind nursery” (I.i.137-138). To Lear love is synonymous with being a caretaker. Lear does not understand love beyond utility. Before his tragic

    Read More

  • Analyzing Shakespeare´s Account of Human Nature in King Lear in Comparison With Other Authors

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    Human nature is a concept that has interested scholars throughout history. Many have debated over what human nature is – that is, the distinguishing characteristics that are unique to humans by nature – while others have mulled over the fact that the answer to the question “what is human nature?” may be unattainable or simply not worth pursuing. Shakespeare explores the issue of human nature in his tragedy King Lear. In his play, he attempts to portray that human nature is either entirely good or entirely evil. He seems to suggest, however, that it is not impossible for one to move from one end of the spectrum of human nature to the other, as multiple characters go through somewhat of a metamorphosis where their nature is changed. In this paper I analyze and present Shakespeare’s account of human nature in King Lear in comparison with other authors that we have read throughout our year in the Aquinas program.

    Read More

  • The Consequences of Decisions in King Lear by William Shakespeare

    1367 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Consequences of Decisions in King Lear by William Shakespeare King Lear is a detailed description of the consequences of one man's decisions. This fictitious man is Lear, King of England, who's decisions greatly alter his life and the lives of those around him. As Lear bears the status of King he is, as one expects, a man of great power but sinfully he surrenders all of this power to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him. This untimely abdication of his throne results in a chain reaction of events that send him through a journey of hell. King Lear is a metaphorical description of one man's journey through hell in order to expiate his sin.

    Read More

  • Fate in Shakespeare's King Lear

    2056 Words  | 5 Pages

    Fate in King Lear & nbsp;           "There's a divinity that shapes our ends, rough hew them how we will. I will be able to do so. "  These words from Hamlet are echoed, even more pessimistically,  in Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of King Lear, Gloucester. Like flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods, they kill us for their sport".  In Lear, the characters are subjected to the various tragedies of life over and over again. & nbsp; An abundance of cyclic imagery in Lear shows that good people are.

    Read More

  • Transformation of Lear in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1682 Words  | 4 Pages

    King Lear is a Shakespearian tragedy revolving largely around one central theme, personal transformation. Shakespeare shows in King Lear that the main characters of the play experience a transformative phase, where they are greatly changed through their suffering. Through the course of the play Lear is the most transformed of all the characters. He goes through seven major stages of transformation on his way to becoming an omniscient character: resentment, regret, recognition, acceptance and admittance, guilt, redemption, and optimism. Shakespeare identifies King Lear as a contemptuous human being who is purified through his suffering into some sort of god.

    Read More

  • Consequences of Actions in Shakespeare's King Lear

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    King Lear is a perfect demonstration of the great consequences one man's actions can cause. While there are certainly religious Christian elements to the story, the story is not one of morality or hope. King Lear is a lesson, making an example of what can come of a single, foolish, egotistical action. King Lear's action is the surrendering of his throne to his daughters.

    Read More

  • King Lear - Disruption Of Order In King Lear And The Causes

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.

    Read More

  • Self-discovery in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1698 Words  | 4 Pages

    arrogant, and  filled with pride as he was in the beginning of the play instead

    Read More

  • Analysis Of King Lear As A Tragic Hero

    707 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the words of Aristotle, a character must possess four key components in order to make them a tragic hero. First, the character must show his good intentions by any speech or action. In Aristotle’s words, “The character will be good if the purpose is good.” (Aristotle) The second component the character must possess is propriety. Propriety simply means the conformity to what is socially acceptable in behavior or speech. The third component is the character must be true to life. The character acts out of probability and necessity, and not just because of some random traits bestowed upon the hero. The final component in completing the tragic hero persona is consistency. The character must maintain consistency in his or her actions throughout

    Read More

  • Comparing Lear and Gloucester in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1980 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and Gloucester's physical blindness that leads to his trusting tendencies. Each character achieves inner awareness at the end as their surreal blindness is lifted and they realize the truth. Both Lear and Gloucester are characters used by Shakespeare to show the relevance of having a clear vision in life.

    Read More

  • Shakespeare's King Lear - The Redemption of King Lear

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is said that no other playwright illustrates the human condition like William Shakespeare. Furthermore, it is said that no other play illustrates the human condition like King Lear. The story of a bad king who becomes a good man is truly one of the deepest analyses of humanity in literary history; and it can be best seen through the evolution of Lear himself. In essence, King Lear goes through hell in order to compensate for his sins.

    Read More

More about King Lear as a Changed Character at the End of Shakespeare's Play

Open Document