In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New world and William Shakespeare's King Lear, the reader will find that both works use similar motifs that mirror each other to increase further the similarities and
significance of the works. The Brave new world tries to destroy any of human emotion, which is why
Huxley has chooses Shakespeare as the basis of John's system of beliefs involved in personal
connection. Although the story lines in both of the publications are quite different from one another,
there is no doubt that there are themes that allow one to create a comparison between the two books.
The most evident motifs in both novels are madness, nonacceptance and the concept of betrayal. that
create an exciting plot and unite the general themes of both novels.
The evident motif that you see in both novels is madness. After giving away all his land to his
two daughters that flattered him with words he wanted to hear, King Lear suffers greatly during the
play because of the cruelties inflicted upon him. Cordelia the only daughter that truly loves him is
disowned, because she chose not to say anything. The two ungrateful daughters contempt and slowly
take away all his powers and strip him of his dignity. After facing this ill treatment by his daughters, he
undergoes a redeeming reversal of character. Lear slowly starts to go mad, Lear. O, let me not be mad,
not mad, sweet heaven!Keep me in temper; I would not be mad! (1.5.44-47). John the savage
encounters the same conflict, when John abandons the Indian reservation to go off to the new world,
he sees that it is nothing like he imagined it to be, John runs away from the this society to a lights
house in which he again is harassed by the residents of the ne...
... middle of paper ...
...lies relation. The
way Goneril and Regan treated King Lear they way they as the result of jealousy towards Cordelia.
The reason for this might be because Cordelia had always been King Lear's most beloved child and
often favoritism such as this can create exasperation. Cordelia's love for her father never died even
after he abandoned her and even after King Lear proclaimed that she was dead to him. Finding out that
King Lear was in trouble through Kent, Cordelia rushed back to find her father who was left outside
and abandoned. Cordelia had been the recipient of love for her entire life,and since she still loved her
father in return and was sympathetic to his senility, she had the urge to help him. However, since
Gonerial and Reagan did not receive the same love that their sister did, they found that false love and flattery would get what they wanted.
With Cordelia declared as banished, Lear states, “With my two daughters’ dowers digest the third...Only we shall retain The name and all th’ addition to a king. The sway, revenue, execution of the rest, Beloved sons, be yours” (Shakespeare 17). Lear’s fault here is that he believes that he can divide up his kingdom to his daughters and still retain the title as king; he wants to retire his position and responsibilities as a king but still remain respected and treated as one. His flaw in wanting to be superior leads to his downfall, as he is so blinded by his greed that he decides to divide up his kingdom to his two daughters who are as hungry for power as he is. They only want to strip him of his position and respect to gain more influence. Lear, not realizing the impact of such an impulsive decision, descends into madness when his daughters force him out of his home. After being locked out of his only shelter by his daughters, he states, “Filial ingratitude!...In such a night To shut me out?...O Regan, Goneril, Your old kind father whose frank heart gave all! O that way madness lies. Let me shun that; No more of that” (Shakespeare 137). Lear becomes fully aware of the consequences of his actions. He realizes how ungrateful his daughters are and how they have treated him unfairly even though he has given them everything; much to his dismay, he is left with
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
end. This essay will further show how both stories shared similar endings, while at the same time
After the publishing of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, modern literature has changed forever. It is considered a masterpiece and one of the pillars of the dystopian novel. However, both of those affirmations can be called into question. The former based on a subjective opinion of a reader and the latter through compromising its dystopian nature. Similarly to George Orwell’s novels, the main appeal of Brave New World is within the ideas it contains, not within its literary merits. Huxley’s talent is essentially composed of his ideas and the attitude he assumes towards the problems he presents. He took full advantage of his endowment in Brave New World Revisited, a non fiction work sequel to Brave New World. The sequel is devoid of a mediocre narrative in favour of factual information and proposing solutions of the tackled problems. Simply put, Brave New World Revisited is what Brave New World should have been.
A Brave New World is a thrilling combination of both malicious and brilliant morals and symbols. This “Brave New World” is a dystopian society set in 2540 A.D. or 632 A.F. (After Ford). It is a novel about how happiness cannot be artificially grown or taught, it is one’s own and is different for everyone. Bernard and Helmholtz are the only people in their dystopian society to really think for their selves. The most significant characters in the book are Bernard Marx, John the Savage, Lenina Crowne, Mustafa Mond, and Helmholtz Watson. The setting of this novel is primarily in London, England, but changes to New Mexico as well. Huxley’s Brave New World incorporates characteristics of his childhood, critical
In 1931 Aldous Huxley published Brave New World, giving a look into a dystopian society of the future. The book is written in a modernist literary view, and is a dramatized version of the issues surrounding the world during the early 20th century. Throughout the book, literary theories and schools of criticism such as Marxist Criticism and Gender Studies can be seen in Huxley’s representation of the main characters of the story and their interactions; he shows the disparity of society when they loose their ability to feel or have emotion, and uses the inter-workings of the World State to show class differences and the consumerist society that has formed due to the importance put on economic prosperity.
... Lears blessing, and declared his daughter. Lear also realized that Kents speaking out was for Lear’s best and that he too was abused and banished. What stings Lear even more is that he is now completely dependent upon his two shameless daughters, Goneril and Regan. Plus that he must now beg them when he took care of them like a father when they were once children, to drive Lears further into madness he realizes that as king he was so ignorant and blind with power that he never took care of the homeless and let them suffer. All these realization and the fact that Lear is in his second childhood a tender stage drive him into the peak of madness.
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley is a fascinating tale of a utopia with no possible way of ever being disrupted. That is, until Alpha-Plus Bernard Marx brings a savage into their type of normalcy. Along with this plot, symbols and countless complex concepts make the book an educational experience worthwhile. Thomas C. Foster’s How to Read Literature Like a Professor helps to show these concepts to an inexperienced reader. Some of the many literary elements the author includes are how all works are connected, how every trip is a quest, and of course, irony.
In Act 1, Lear has all this land that he needs to get rid of, and he chooses to divide it between his daughters. Cordelia is the youngest daughter, and she is very independent. Regan and Goneril are the older daughters, and they abuse their power in many ways. The daughters have to show their love for him in order to get land. Regan and Goneril suck up to him and tell him that they love him. In reality, they don’t love him at all. They just want more power. Cordelia is very straight forward with him. She tells him that she loves him but not as much as her sisters. Lear gets mad by her response, which shows that the daughters have enough power to make him feel whatever emotion they want. They can easily get under his skin, and strip him of his power. His power was at an all-time high, but over time it gets taken over.
...ce, although both writings are interesting in their own ways, the most interesting aspect of both writings together is that they both have a similar plot and theme. It is rare that two
This passage reflects Lear's resting point in the great journey of the play. First he was constrained by foolish pride, then overtaken with insanity. After emerging from this period of mental illness, he was consumed by a desire to end his stay upon the "wheel of fire" (4.7.53) by suicide. But through his trials and travails he has now realized what he is: not a King, but a father; not a fool, but a "foolish fond old man" (4.7.69). He is Lear - no more, no less. His gentle dialogue to his trespassed daughter show...
...easures and reckless behavior instead of close connections and marriage, John’s morals continue to cause a significant issue that demonstrates how he would be unable to survive in such a society. While his morals are constantly put to the test, through the different forms of entertainment, his own friend mocking his ways, and his relationship with the girl he loves, they are finally broken in a high-pressure situation at the end of the novel. As a result, John is so guilty and broken after the events that he brings upon his own death. Through this experience, Brave New World exhibits the struggle that someone who has not adapted to the modern world’s ways will face, yet also emphasizes that they should continue to maintain their own ways despite this for the alternative of conforming to society’s ways, which go against your morals, could be even more consequential.
In the dystopian novel, Brave New World, Huxley uses symbols to create meaning and to get his agenda across. The use of sex and reproduction, and Shakespearian writing and religious texts, as symbols in the novel help to push Huxley’s agenda that total government control is devastating, and the inner human drive to be an individual can never be suppressed. Also, the fact that the novel was written in 1931 shows that Huxley was attacking the newly forming Socialist nations.
He shows an example of how humans are shaped by those around them. John is relatable to people today because of the way that he differs from every other citizen living in the World State. He has flaws which are fundamentally similar to those of people today. Regardless, he is similar to people living under the World State by being heavily affected by his surroundings, contrary to the image of him as a champion of freedom. In a similar way, humans today are like John, because they are affected by their surroundings in a way that makes their choice simply a consequence of how they interpret their world. Ultimately, by presenting different points-of-view through the flawed characters and the state of society in Brave New World, Aldous Huxley shows the importance of perspective when analysing complex situations, such as questions of free will and
Huxley 's Brave New World is an arrogant vision of a future that is cold and discouraging. The science fiction novel is dystopian in tone and in subject matter. Paradox and irony are the dominant themes used within the novel to suggest the negative impact of excessive scientific and technological progress on man and his relationship with the natural world, very similar to today 's society. It links to the title which was created from the Shakespearean play called The Tempest using the famous quote ‘O’ Brave New World’ but instead of referring to an island paradise, it now describes a nightmare of a place full of mockery for being equal and overbearing control among one another.