Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship of religion to ethics
Secular ethics
Impacts of religion on moral values
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship of religion to ethics
The main argument that Arthur states is that religion is not a prominent factor within morality, though it can be related. He also believes that morality is more influenced by society than religion. Arthur does not argue that religion and morality can never be connected; but claims the possibility of the two being independent from each other. The best point he makes is that non-religious people can still have a conception of morality. Arthur’s first problem with religion being the main incentive to do good is with the idea that religion is necessary for moral motivation. The problem with this idea is that many people have different motives, apart from religious ones. Individuals might have more concern about being caught doing something they shouldn’t do, or developing a poor reputation.
Arthur’s next problem is the idea that religion is necessary for moral guidance in that people can only know the moral thing to do through religious teaching and revelation. The problem with that, Arthur explains, is that there are too many things to know. He ponders what would be the appropriate thing to do through revelations being through God’s words and God’s acts and how would
…show more content…
Although the Divine Command Theory assumes that the existence of God is necessary for the existence of morality, Arthur points out the possibility for the existence of good to be completely independent from the existence of God. He believes that the conscience, as a result of social forces, acts as a person’s moral motivation and moral guidance if not religion. Arthur also says that language is necessary for morality. Morality is social as it is an entity that "governs relationships between people.” It is used by individuals to justify their actions to others. Morality, through the consciousness of a person, serves as the voice and perspective of others within the individual—upholding Dewey’s
One link between the Legends of Arthur and the Catholic Church was Chivalry (the oaths of a knight). Arthur made all his knights take these oaths, which for the most part had to do with the teachings of the church. They were to remain loyal to the church and always obey its teachings and direction. A knight had a strong belief in Christ and other biblical figures. Some knight were even ordered to do a specific job for the church such as defend the church.
Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or an amalgamation of both. Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, Martin Luther King’s “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality as the
Then what, Foot asks, could the real reason for morality’s special authority be? Nothing, she answers — premise 3. She says that it might seem that morality has a special dignity because of strength of teaching. We are taught that morality has special command over us in virtue of its being a system of categorical imperatives, so we feel like it has that authority. But in reality, Foot says, there is no magical must. She can find no satisfactory explanation for morality to have special authority, so she decides that it does
In Iris Murdoch’s “Morality and Religion” the author, an English novelist, makes many arguments that writers can either agree with or disagree. She talks about morality and religion and the philosophy behind the two. Murdoch’s main argument is whether there can be morality without religion. She asserts her view of morality and religion by defining religion, explaining the differences between the two while questioning both, and analyzing virtue and duty. By comparing and contrasting morality and religion she makes her view ambivalent and complex therefore letting her readers decide whether or not religion is necessary for morality. While some writers extend Murdoch’s claims other writers like Aristotle complicate her view of religion and morality.
Morals are usually the standards by one which lives in, whether them being good or bad. However, how about when religion influences ones morals? Religion isn’t or it doesn’t work for everyone, and that’s okay. But, there are many people out there that religion influences their morals; and the most common reason for that is that religion was influenced into them and into their morals as a child. Iri...
In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, religion greatly impacts the decisions Sir Gawain makes during the times he spends preparing to fight the Green Knight, oftentimes connecting with the honor and power that comes with the chivalric code. A journey of self-discovery, however, can not be that simple, as Gawain can also be found struggling between his duties as a knight and his morals as a Christian.
Religion and morality exist together in parallel according to Alan Keyes. Alan Dershowitz stated that if religion and morality are not separated, it could have negative discourse. James Fowler followed Piaget, Kohlberg, and Erickson when selecting the stages to his development of faith across the life span. These three men all selected different ways to look at religio...
In order to understand divine command theory we must first understand the nature of God and Morality. So we will start by taking a look at what makes an action moral. Once we understand what makes an action moral, we can then try to understand the author's’ viewpoint on the divine command theory of ethics. Understanding the viewpoint will allow us to dissect the author’s viewpoints and come up with counter-arguments that the author must then contend with.
... agrees with White, the broadest extent. Religion acts as a moral compass for all of those who have faith regardless of the type of religion HELP***
Three assumptions about morality and religion are: 1.) Religious belief is needed to get us to do our duty. 2.) Morality must be created by someone, and God is by far the best candidate for the job. 3.)
Decisions that add or take away from their love for God, love of self, or love of neighbour is the job of every conscience. All people are faced with moral and immoral choices in every day life. What helps solve ones problem is their conscience. There are three things that help one develop their conscience. They are the teachings of the magisterium, tradition and scripture.
...teenth century intellects claimed that morality was independent of religion, and that religious authority had no say in the moral dictates of an individual. This sort of thought would eventually sway the public’s view in matters of morality and religion and eliminate the churches influence in society and institution altogether.
" Religion is not just a social, cultural, political, or ideological factor; instead it finds its power in the personal chambers of the soul of the individual. Within the soul we discover the source of the private motivation that forms perceptions and behavior ( pg 7, Rediscovering the Kingdom)."
Therefore, religion cannot stop deviance but at the same time some relation with other deviance and religion cannot be said to just be social bond (Bainbridge 1989, p.294). One theory alone is not enough to explain said findings. It is true to state or theorize that the lack of religion may have increased suicide, based on how diabolical and unwelcoming the deviance was in older time. They tended to reject the burial of bodies that have committed suicide, now however, this is not the case, and churches tend to any human body. (Bainbridge 1989, p.294) It is to say that from the conclusion that religion’s power in society changes in time as society itself changes (Bainbridge 1989, p.294).
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.