Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social significance of kinship
The negative and positive of kinship
The negative and positive of kinship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social significance of kinship
Kin selection is an evolutionary strategy that puts a relatives own reproductive success above the actor (Hamilton, 1964). Even if an actor cannot pass on their genes, whether it is because they are infertile or because they cannot find a mate, if they help a sibling or parent by raising other offspring, they make sure that their genes are passed on to the next generation. When an actor helps raise siblings or cousins, those siblings and cousins have at least 25% of the actors own genes in them that they can pass on. In certain primates, such as tamarins, tend to have twins every birth cycle. Taking care of twins can be really hard, so the adult tamarins rely on older offspring or other close related relatives to help raise the new sets of offspring. When primates mate, only the mother can be certain of the fact that she is the mother. The father, though, cannot be sure if he is the father or not. Many primates, such as Chimps, will conduct infanticide within groups so that he may breed with the females in that group. To ensure that this does not happen, females will mate with multiple males, ensuring that the males or male that is within the group will no commit infanticide. This act confuses the male, making him question whether or not that offspring is his, so instead of risking his fitness, he will protect the offspring and the female like he knew for sure that the offspring was his. But how can the male know for sure if that offspring belongs to him or not? Some researchers have discussed and experimented with the theory of kin recognition (Blaustein, 1983).
Kin recognition is a way for males to be sure about which offspring is theirs. When recognizing kin, many people believe that smells that come from a specific parent is...
... middle of paper ...
...xperiments stated in this paper show that while many humans may not be able to tell others apart at times, they really can by simple cues and comparisons to themselves. The same can be said for animals. While not all animals avoid incest, certain ones can by the hypothesis that those that look like the actor(s) are and can be related to them, so they should not breed with them. This hypothesis tells researchers that while it may not look like family groups can tell each other apart, due to certain acts in the group, they really can. Fathers are able to know which offspring is theirs, thus ensuring investment to that offspring, so that the offspring can survive to a reproductive age. Kin recognition can also be seen as a mechanism not only ensures investment in the right offspring, but also an investment in the relative reproductive success of kin (Blaustein, 1983).
Broad, K.D, J.P Curley, and E.B Keverne. "Mother–infant Bonding and the Evolution of Mammalian Social Relationships." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society, 2014. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
Opie C , Atkinson QD , Dunbar RIM , Shultz S. 2013 Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 13328-13332
Through this distinction, American Kinship ties can be divided in two groups. First, the “Basic term” and the second is the “Derivative Term”. “Basic Terms” include- “Father”, “Mother”, “Brother”, “Sister”, “Son”, “Daughter”, which signify all relationships that are formed out of natural ties, that is through the connection of a similar, biogenetic make – up. “Derivative Terms” are “Basic Terms” and a modifier. Like, “Father” is a basic term, but the “-in-law” is a modifier. So what Schneider essentially did, was to put down the criteria for which a person can be related, and he highlighted the importance of the exchange of natural substance, for the establishment of a kin tie. He spoke of how, blood ties are interminable, while relations formed out of law, can be. So, in the three sets, that is (1) In Nature, (2) In Law, (3) By Blood ties are formed, either by nature, but not by law, not by nature, but by law, and by both nature and law,
...’s additional question shows that the study of behaviours such as filial imprinting is not set, and that additional questions and new developments will give a batter undersatning of practices.
For this first analytical essay, I have decided to have a go at analyzing the Nature Vs. Nurture using my own viewpoint as a sibling. No doubt this is a topic that has been debated to mental death already, but I think it is something I will benefit from thinking about. Also, at the end of my main topic, I will quickly address a topic brushed on in the book.
... males’ sexual advances, and the victims of incest may plan their pregnancies as a means of escaping from their victimization” (Roosa, Tein, Reinholtz and Angelini 120).
Social groups of primates closely relate to sexual dimorphism, because how each of their communities interact with one another plays a large role in sexual selection. Sexual selection, as Darwin stated, is a key factor and cause in the morphological dimorphism between sexes of a species. Additionally, sexual selection comes from male competition, which directly correlates to primate’s social structures. For example, genus gorilla is a part of a polygynous mating system, which consists of one male and multiple female. This creates an environment where males must compete with one another to reproduce and create offspring. Due to this competition, males must prove to be strong and attract themselves to females to ensure reproductive success. These strong male traits are favored in sexual selection, because the females are highly particular about the male they mate with, so there become specific male traits that are most desirable. Therefore, in polygynous groups, sexual dimorphism is the greatest (Frayer, Wolpoff, 1985). In comparison, a monogamous primate such as genus hylobate or gibbons has a social structure that consists of a more nuclear based family. There is a lot less male competition because males do not mate with multiple females. Therefore, primates are less dimorphic in monogamous social structures (Frayer, Wolpoff,
The structure of this essay is based on animals and humans mate choice strategies and gender differences and similarities. These factors are intertwined with males and females reproduction success for choosing the right mate and bearing the parental cost involved in the offspring upbringing. (Trivers, 1972, 1985).Animal males from the evolutionary perspectives seek fertile, strong, females as a security for their offspring reproduction. These males’ strategize for their mate choice by advertising their masculinity as men ready for a mate. (Buss & Barnes, 1986; Buss, 1987).The female animals chooses mate base on their sense of security so they prefer males capable to protect and bear the cost of parenting with them.(Trivers,1972).In humans, females prefer wealthy men with high status as mate (Bjorklund & shackleford, 1999; Buss, 1992) whereas males prefer to date young attractive females who considers as fertile with the ability for genes reproduction.
Pheromones are natural scents, which play an important role in sexual communication. Animals and humans release masses of biological chemicals in tears, saliva and perspiration. These aromas convey signals relating to mood, status, drive and health to the subconscious awareness of the female. The dominant male will exude more of these biological attractants than his submissive counterpart, consequently he inevitably attracts more females and enjoys more conquests. This philosophy holds well in the animal world, pheromones are consciously detected over considerable distances and serve at times in place of spoken communication. They help animals mark territory, recognize mates, and signal sexual interest. For example, female dogs in heat leave their pheromone and can attract male dogs over a mile away (5).
Trivers (1972) expanded on the sexual selection theory proposed by Darwin (1871) by claiming that there were two links between parental investment and sexual selection. The first association is that the sex that invests more in the offspring should be more selective about their mating preference, and this is because of the reproductive costs linked with unselective mating. The second link is that the sex that invests less in the offspring should compete more forcefully for the high-investing individual of the opposite sex.
Chimpanzees (Figure 1) are the closest living relatives to us, and they share 99 percent of our DNA (1). Chimpanzees have distinct group territoriality. Male chimpanzees “patrol” near the boundary between the two ranges, at that time they move very carefully and quietly, and they can cease to listen and observe the range of their neighbors. Patrolling individuals are likely to face cruel and violent attacks, injuries, and even deaths. Intense excitement and aggressive display can occur if the two parties of two communities encounter each other. Usually, the larger group holds its ground, and interaction between different chimpanzees communities may also lead to gang attack. Expanding the community range is necessary to their social organizations, the males cooperation can defend the territory and increase the reproductive rates of the resident females by excluding female and male competitors. Body contact is common in their social life such as grooming (1). Usually, chimpanzees groom each other as a way to show harmony and solidarity in their society (Figure 2). Grooming each other demonstrates the deep bonds and close relationship between them. In addition, they can even hug, hold hands, touch, kiss each other as a way of emotional expression (2).
Genes are expected to give offspring hereditary similarities to the parent. However, this was not known and Gregory Mendel asked himself what was passed on by parents to their offspring that is the basis for similarity. Mendel would go on through experiments with pea plants to answer short questions. The answers were short as well as to say that the passing of characteristics from parents to the offspring is throug...
It may seem obvious to some why people mate, however there are many facets to human mating. Psychology has shown that reasons for mating have gone beyond the scope of love and physical attractiveness. People may search for mates who resemble archetypical images of the opposite-sex parent, mates with characteristics that are either complementary or similar to one's own qualities, or mates with whom to make an exchange of valuable resources (Buss 238). Although these theories play a key role in understanding patterns in human mating preferences, evolutionary psychology and sexual selection theory provide more concrete frameworks for explaining human mating.
This is a highly dubious claim. Any analysis, however shallow, will reveal its weaknesses. Our genetic material gets diluted beyond reconstruction with time. It constitutes 50% of the first generation, 25% of the second and so on. If this were the paramount concern – incest should have been the norm, being a behaviour better able to preserve a specific set of genes (especially today, when genetic screening can effectively guard against the birth of defective babies). Moreover, progeny is a dubious way of perpetuating one's self. No one remembers one's great great grandfathers. One's memory is better preserved by intellectual feats or architectural monuments. The latter are much better conduits than children and grandchildren.
The limbic system is associated with emotional behavior, long-term memory, and olfaction. Your sense of smell is the first and most primitive sense you use when you are born. It helps newborns to recognize their parents. Our sense of smell is intertwined with our memories formed in our brain.