Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
drivers of globalisation explained
definition of globalization
definition, nature and scope of globalisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: drivers of globalisation explained
Globalisation is explained in simplistic terms as ‘the widening, deepening and speeding up of worldwide interconnectedness’(Held & McGrew, 2007).It has seen considerable intensification in recent decades due to furthering development of technology, such as the invention of the internet and mobile phones, and increasing dependence on the interconnected global financial market. As the globalisation process has grown, academics have offered several differing ideas on the phenomenon and its effects. According to Cochrane and Pain (2004), the viewpoints that attempt to explain globalisation can be defined by four categories, these are positive globalists, negative globalists, inter-nationalists and transformationalists. This essay will critically …show more content…
Transformationalists believe that while there is a significant shift happening to national cultures; there is evidence that the changes are ‘more nuanced or contradictory’ than believed by inter-nationalists or globalists (Mackay, 2004). Finally, globalists put forward the idea that the process is ‘real and tangible’ and that national boundaries are showing fewer disparities between each other. Globalists point to four key concepts to justify their findings; stretched social relations, intensifications of flows, increasing interpenetration and furthering arrangements of global infrastructure. The concept of stretched social relations suggests that a common cultural, economic and political process is expanding beyond regionalisation and is having, in fact, a significant impact on the entire world. Intensifications of flows suggest networks of interconnectedness have increased. For example, communications have risen due to the advent of the internet; and ‘global infrastructure’ refers to the formal and informal institutional arrangements made between different nations. Globalists have differing beliefs about the long-term consequences of globalisation, however. Pessimistic (or negative) globalists emphasise the assertive dominance countries are imposing worldwide and opine that this is hurting the idea of nationality while positive globalists see the results of globalisation as having provided improvements in
I will begin by briefly reintroducing you to what globalisation is and what changes in brings. Then I will move on to answering the first part of the question referring to a few resources and examples, during this discussion I will also state my opinion on this matter. The second part of the question will be answered in the same manner as the first one. After the main body of my argument I will summarize and conclude.
It would appear that globalisation is seen to be the borders between countries, governments, the economy and communities, collective liberalization and openness of markets, particularly through the elimination of barriers to trade in goods and services and the expansion of integrated global financial market. PRUS (2001) simplified the term of globalisation as a process of increasing connectivity, where
The term 'globalization' has been subjected to a variety of interpretations. Though at its simplest it can be seen as how the world has become integrated economically, politcally, socially and culturally through the advances of technology, communication and transport John Baylis et al. (2011).
John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens define globalisation as “mostly simply [or simplistically!] defined as a process of increasing interconnectedness between societies such that events in one part of the world increasingly have effects on peoples and societies far away. A globalized world is one in which political, economic, cultural, and social events become more and more inter connected, and also one in which they have more impact” (John Baylis S. S., 2014, p. 9).
Of these traits, a small handful could be considered core qualities of globalization. According to Steger, these qualities include “the creation of new social networks and the multiplication of existing connections”, “the expansion and the stretching of social relations”, “the intensification and acceleration of social exchanges”, and “ involves both the macro-structures of a ‘global community’ and the micro-structures of ‘global personhood’” (14-15). Steger utilizes these concepts to offer a short, working definition that reads “Globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space” (15). One last vital factor to keep in mind is that globalization, by its very nature
Raewyn Connell’s journal article ‘The Northern Theory of Globalization’ (2007) demonstrates that our current understanding of globalisation is limited to a ‘Northern’ theory as it has predominantly been cultivated from a metropolitan standing point, thus proving somewhat paradoxical as the concept of globalisation is one, Connell feels (2007:368), who’s focus is on the ‘world-as-a-whole’. This is evident as Connell (2007:368) states in his opening that ‘If we want a genuinely global analysis of globalization we must reconstruct sociological theory as a markedly more inclusive dialogue.’ Connell divulges into this field by examining first the rising of the theory of globalisation and the historicity that surrounds it, secondly the current theories regarding globalisation and the antimonies within them and then present reasons affirming his belief in ‘the northerness of globalization’ (2007:378).
In explaining the world in which we find ourselves today, globalisation has come to remain as the term of reference—it is the defining terms in contemporary society . In technical sense it is viewed as an “increase in cross-border economic interaction and resource flows, producing a qualitative shift in the relations between national economies and between national states”. This in abstract is what we currently experience as the global order of our time. Though the contributions of globalisation are remarkable and reflect to an extent positive impacts on the day to day activities of people, it as well comes with its consequential effects, thereby leaving its remnants on the quality of livelihood and the increasing gaps of inequalities that
Globalisation can be construed in many ways. Many sociologists describe it as an era in which national sovereignty is disappearing as a result of a technological revolution, causing space and time to be virtually irrelevant. It is an economic revolution, which Roland Robertson refers to in his book ‘Globalisation’ 1992 pg 8, as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole”. It is argued that globalisation allows the world to become increasingly more united, with people more conscious of ethnic, societal, civilizational and individual aspects of their lives.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
The term globalisation describes the process of becoming worldwide in scope or application, and the increasing interdependency of nation-sates. At least - that gives us one loose definition for globalisation, but as Scholte (2000) realises, globalisation is a thoroughly contested subject, with arguments extend across the issue of definition as well as measurement, chronology, explanation and normative judgement. In fact, Scholte identifies five contrasting definitions for the word 'globalisation' as used by a number of the subject's commentators and critics - internationalisation, liberalisation, universalisation, western/modernisation and deterrioralisation are (2000: 13).
However, there are key traits that are agreed upon by many, if not most, researchers in the field. There are two key traits that are relevant for the current paper. The first trait is that globalisation transcends traditional boundaries. For example, Mohammad Abed-Aljabbari defines globalisation as system that ‘extend[s] a culture and transferring it to other countries’ . This means that what was historically confined to a specific culture is readily available and easily transferred between countries. Culture may refer to traditions, or the culture of learning and even the culture in which organisations are run. The second trait that is commonly found in the defining of globalisation is that it enhances interdependence between nations. Flanagan, Kugler, and Frost (2011) aptly coined the hustle and bustle that is created by globalisation as the ‘process of growing international activity’ . The emphasis on the growth of a porous, unrestricted, and broad-reaching collaborative process allows us to reconcile with the fact that countries depend on each other extensively in order to progress. This, as will be presented later, comes with opportunities and challenges on its own. Thus, even when the definition of globalisation is yet to be perfected, it is clear that the term is referring to the phenomenon that encompasses the transcendence of traditional boundaries which leads to an interdependence between nations for
Using 1997 financial crisis and other examples, discuss how globalization is important to the modern business journalism. Introduction
A process of increasing integration and interdependence between countries has been known for some decades or even centuries before it was labelled with the term “globalisation” in 1980s and since then the issue has been more and more discussed and examined. Globalisation is nowadays understood as a complex process that involves changes and interconnection in all fields of human life. This phenomenon is present all over the world and is becoming very influencing in many ways. Countries of the world are getting closer to each other and that is why the questions of its positive or negative impact on the world itself and on comparative politics arise.
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.