“Inside Out” After watching the Pixar film “Inside Out”, it is easy to see how this film relates to small group communication. This film focuses on a twelve year old girl name Riley and how the emotions in her brain work throughout everyday experiences. The emotions Joy, Sadness, Anger, Fear, and Disgust work inside headquarters of Riley’s brain, that is until Joy and Sadness accidentally wind up far from headquarters into long-term memory. I will be analyzing this film using concepts from the textbook such as group communication, group development, group membership, and diversity in groups. The first chapter of “Working in Groups” focuses on group communication, the first aspect being the key elements of group communication (Engleberg and …show more content…
First from this chapter we worked on the three layers of diversity (Engleberg and Wynn 74). Some of Riley’s diverse aspects are that she has her own individual personality, she is Caucasian, twelve years old, female, a middle school student, and many more. Also we did the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator with the mindset of being Riley (MyersBriggs.org), finding that she is an extrovert, which means she focuses outward and gets her energy from being around others. She is also a sensor, someone who focuses on details and is practical and realistic. Also she is a feeler and perceiver meaning she is people-oriented and seeks group harmony, also that she likes open-endedness and sees being on time as less important than being flexible and adaptable (Engleberg and Wynn 78-80). The film also included stereotypes such as the cool girl at school, the gender roles, and the representation of the emotions. The gender roles varying from the way the male emotions, Anger and Fear, were dressed and the overall way they acted to the female characters, Joy, Sadness, and Disgust, seeming more caring and nurturing. In conclusion the film “Inside Out” contains many aspects from module one of small group communication. From the group communication, the key elements, interaction, and interdependence of each of the emotions/characters. The group development throughout the movie, the development stages forming, storming, norming, and performing. Group membership their interpersonal needs and group roles. Last but not least the diversity in the characters, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and the gender roles throughout the
The author of the essay, Carol Tavris, seems to be very passionate about what she is writing. She has her doctorate in Psychology and has had her articles published in many well-known magazines. The intended audience of her essay is the general public. The purpose of this article is to inform the public that they need to stand out and use their own minds in a group setting instead of hiding in the comfort of their fellow friends and colleagues.
The term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed “mindguards”. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink. The first, "high group cohesiveness" which is the direction for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal, or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. Secondly, the structural faults such as insulation of the group, lack of norms and central leadership, in addition social background of group members. The third, situational context includes the circumstances of the groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a unanimous vote must be reached, despite this one man refuses to vote guilty. In 1957 the Orson Welles directed film opens as the judge explains the case and its severity. Soon after the group forms as the 12 men enter the jury discussion room. During these scene frames, the case evidence is explained. As the men talk they give details of an old man living beneath the boy testified, that he heard a fight, stat...
Group interaction: is a procedure by which verbal and nonverbal messages are traded between a constrained numbers, normally from 3 to 20 individuals. This typically happens in a meeting, for example, school, healing centre, care home and school inside of the staffs. In the course of the group communication, each individual will attempt and get their thoughts and considerations crosswise over to the general population in the
...otionally and personality begins to blossom. This movie has a huge social aspect to it, especially considering everyone was sitting around a table discussing the fate of the world and how they were going to prevent the bombs from going off. Without our social capabilities, the discussion they had would cease to exist.
While the Pixar film “Inside Out” is an adorably animated children’s movie, it also speaks to the adult generation and is a brilliant way to introduce psychological ideals and mental illnesses to both children and adults in a fun, innovative way. When the movie is viewed for the first time, it seems like a fun cartoon that explains emotions to kids, but after several viewings, you become more connected with the characters and really begin to understand the human body and emotions on a whole new level. We learn that we cannot just live with one emotion, and happiness is not always the most achievable. Told from a 3rd person point of view, we live the life of Riley through the eyes of Joy, Sadness, Fear, Anger and disgust. When joy is out of the equation, we are introduced to a world of psychological goodies that can be discussed in depth.
Bormann E. G. & Bormann & N. C. (1996). Effective Small Group Communication (6th Edition). Edina, MN: Burgess Publishing.
Social Psychology is the study of how we think and relate to other people. These psychologists focused on how the social situation influences others behavior. We see social influences everywhere we go, but might not notice it. Like when watching a movie for fun you do not notice it as much as when you are actually looking for the behaviors, like in the film The Breakfast Club. There are several examples of social psychological behaviors in the film.
Gilovich, T., & Gilovich, T. (2013). Chapter 12/ Groups. In Social psychology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
In conclusion, something happens to individuals when they collect in a group, they act differently to the way they would on their own, regardless of whether the group has gathered to solve problems, make decisions or have fun, and regardless of whether the members know each other. (Psychology in perspective, third edition, Tavris and Wade, 2001)
TUCKMAN, B. 1965. Developmental Sequences in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin 63, p 384 – 99. cited in DOEL, M. and SAWDON, C. (2001). The Essential Group Worker: Teaching and Learning Creative Group Work. London: J Kingsley.
... Chapter 2: Small Group Communication Theory.Communicating in small groups: principles and practices (9th ed., pp. 42-44). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Rothwell, J. Dan. In Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.
According to Toseland (1984), “Social order and stability are prerequisites for the formation and maintenance of a cohesive group” (p.78). The group culture of respect and support as well as the established roles assisted in creating the cohesive group. However, certain personality differences and dynamics can negatively impact the group culture. For example, one of the older girls demonstrated dominance over the youngest girl of the group. The younger girl was submissive and shy. During one observation, the girls processed a disagreement over a joined project. The eldest girl would not allow the younger girl to help as she felt her lack of skill would mess up the project. The younger girl’s feelings were hurt and the eldest girl was steadfast in her position. Personality differences are inevitable and likely to be seen in all group settings. The dynamics and personality differences between individuals impact the overall group
At first glance, Pixar’s Inside Out seems to be your standard coming of age film. The film follows an 11-year-old girl, Riley who is forced to make a move from Minnesota to San Francisco with her parents. However, a deeper look at the film reveals how accurate it is to developmental psychology. The center of the story isn’t Riley and her family, but Riley’s primary emotions –Joy, Sadness, Fear, Anger, and Disgust. The five emotions are personified as characters that control her mind as she transitions from childhood to adolescence and deals with the challenge of adjusting to a new place. Inside Out uses Riley and her emotions function as a demonstration of the relationship between emotion and cognition. In doing so, the film reveals several important questions about developmental psychology. Such as, how do emotions color our memories of the past and what is
Effective communications is defined as the successful exchange of information between individuals. An effective communicator is successful in establishing an active two-way link with another individual or group. When people work in groups, there are two quite separate issues involved. The first is the task and the problems involved in getting the job done. The second is the process of the group work itself: the mechanisms by which the group acts as a unit. Without due attention to this process the value of the group can be diminished or even destroyed; yet with a little explicit management of the process, it can enhance the worth of the group to be many times the sum of the worth of its individuals. It is this synergy which makes group work attractive in corporate organization despite the possible problems (and time spent) in group formation (Blair, 2015).