However, readers notice when novice writers use highfaluting words when simple words would do and it does not make them think highly of the writer. On the contrary, the novice writer's attempt to sound impressive makes the reader think that he is trying too hard. The use of highfaluting words just confuses the reader instead of intensifying his reading experience. Using fancy words when simple words are enough is one example of vague writing. Vague writing occurs in the following ways: when the writer does not really know what he is talking about, when the writer imitates other writer's styles just because they are popular and when he conceals his true opinion from the reader.
As Zinsser states, “Develop one voice that readers will recognize when they hear it on the page,” (Zinsser 231). When it comes to writing he believes one should not try to sound casual, one should not breezy write. When a writer tries to breezy write Zinsser states, that instead of making the reading more of an ease to read the writer is putting up obstacles; cheap slang, cliches, windy philosophizing etc. which can just complicated the reading. They also take from one 's originality, one 's mark on a paper.
“First order thinking is intuitive and creative and does not strive for conscious direction or control.” Elbow explains how you can get your best ideas from writing your thoughts down instead of planning. On the other hand, he adds that first order thinking doesn’t give us something valuable. While first order thinking is not having control or direction, second order thinking help you write down your thoughts clearly an in order. On the other hand he adds that second order thinking is slow steps that lead us into wrongheadedness. The author states, “If we would see clearly the truth about thinking and writing we would see that the situation is not either/or, it’s both/ and: the more first order thinking, the more second order thinking, and vice versa.” Elbow writes that you should use both of these thinking processes because they go hand and hand, but don’t use them at the same time.
To keep the reader guessing and to hold the attention. Blurring these boundaries between Fiction and Non-Fiction has always been a great way for authors to make their points, yield their arguments, and to keep interest. If authors did not utilize this particular technique, most non-fiction accounts would become boring and uninteresting to a reader who did not want to learn about the particular. It is completely acceptable as long as the readers are told of the fictional aspect of the work. This is not one of the easiest techniques to use but if written correctly, creating a fictional account cannot be considered anything but excellent writing.
A goal an author can have when writing is to let their writing’s ideas be spread through the reader. A writer accomplishes this by having an organized, but interesting paper. The writer doesn’t repeat phrases over and again, and twists are included where they are not expected. The most important thing good writing does is the text being able to relay its ideas to the reader in a vivid manner. The reader should be able to then remember what was said even after the text has been finished with reading.
This is a great way to help me sound more interesting and sophisticated. Choosing the right word can make your paper go from dull and simple, to more serious and intriguing. It’s important because it helps set the tone of my papers and will assure someone to take me seriously. Lastly, I believe that my “Banning Alcohol” project strongly proves my argument. When you lack words, it shuts down new insights and people will more likely tend to ignore you or not really care about what you have to say.
An essential part of writing creative non-fiction is writing as truthfully as possible. This allows readers to better trust the author. Readers expect that the author will recount events as accurately as possible, or choose to market their writing as another genre. Sometimes writers choose to ignore this. Even with the best intentions, this is deceptive to the reader.
If this be your aim, as it should be, you will not be impatient if it takes more time and effort to read a great book than it does a newspaper. You may have one final objection to marking books. You can't lend them to your friends because nobody else can read them without being distracted by your notes. Furthermore, you won't want to lend them because a marked copy is a kind of intellectual diary, and lending it is almost like giving your mind away. If your friend wishes to read your "Plutarch's Lives," "Shakespeare," or "The Federalist Papers," tell him gently but firmly, to buy a copy.
If you do not, you fail as a writer because no one can understand you or what you are saying. If you want to be a good writer, you must make it so that the public can understand it. In order for a piece of writing to be taken by the public as good, a writer must make the literature seem real. If people do not believe it or believe that it could happen, then it is lost. Reality, though, does not mean if does exist or not.
Turkle provides dialogues of individuals who avoid social interactions at all cost and would rather communicate through technology, as it is just an inconvenience to have direct confrontations. These dialogues strongly support Turkle’s argument that we’re creating a greater gap between others and ourselves. The reason we are lonely is because we place less effort into building relations with others. Turkle’s stance on this topic is emotionally engaging as she uses rhetoric in a very powerful approach, while also remaining unbiased. The article flows very smoothly in a beautifully structured format.