Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl marx philosophy
Karl marx philosophy
Karl marx biographical essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl marx philosophy
Karl Marx, a modern German philosopher, forever altered our perception of who we are by offering a description of human nature that differs from traditional thinking. Although Marx’s theories were groundbreaking, they do not escape criticism. More specifically, differing views are offered for both the importance of labor and how our society shapes our nature. In this essay, I will be addressing these two opposing views and arguing for Marx’s description of human nature. Marx rejects the idea that human nature consists of any certain, particular activity. He instead puts forward the idea that our human nature is a product of the society we live in (Wall, 2005). Marx accepts the notion that humans are rational, thinking things and expands upon this idea to say that humans are also creative, productive beings at their core (Sayers, 2005). Humans exercise this creativity through the productive activity of labor, which is the inspired, fulfilling means through which humans become self-actualized. Self-actualization is the process by which, “man reproduces himself not only intellectually, in his consciousness, but actively and actually, and he can therefor contemplate himself in a world he himself has created” (Wall, 2005, p. 297). Marx sees man’s ability to use his labor to carry out actions as consciously planned as what distinguishes man from other beings (Wartenberg, 1982). For example, while animals carry out productive actions, such as building nests, through natural instinct, man is productive through his own conscious planning. It is important to understand that Marx is less concerned with answering the metaphysical questions of existence and more concerned with uncovering how society, more specifically economic forces, sha... ... middle of paper ... .... Marx offers a refreshing, clear view to human nature that can and should be considered by all. Works Cited Marx, K. (1970). The German Ideology (Arthur, ed.). New York, NY: International Publishers. Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2011). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. Sayers, S. (2005). WHY WORK? MARX AND HUMAN NATURE. Science & Society, 69(4), 606-616. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216124500?accountid=7113 Wall, T. F. (2005). On Human Nature: An Introduction to Philosophy (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Wartenberg, T. E. (1982). “Species-Being” and “Human Nature” in Marx. Human Studies, 5(2), 77-95. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008832 Wilson, J. R. S. (1977). The Basis of Plato’s Society. Philosophy, 52(201), 313-320. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3749586
... middle of paper ... ... According to Marx, a person is actually the action or practical activity that he does to transform nature into an object. Division of labor and private ownership of today’s modern world workers are alienated from their essential source of identity. This kind of alienation causes us to lose purpose of life for human species.
Philosophy Exam #3 Philosophers have tried to describe human nature in a plethora of diverse ways. Some focus on what they think humans are born as, what their life goals are, or what morals classify them as human. Mead and Marx both focus on the surroundings of certain types of people, and describe how this changes their human nature. In the process, they both describe similar but different human natures. Mead believes human nature is cultural, and therefore can be shaped by nurture.
Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. "7,8,9,10." In The elements of moral philosophy. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145.
Marx had rather extreme views on the extent to which nature in his time had become humanized as a result of human labor. He commented, “Even the objects of the simplest, “sensuous certainty” are only given to him through social development, industry and commercial intercourse. ”[2] "Throughout their labor, humans shape their own material environment, thereby transforming the very nature of human existence in the process. ”[3] One always seemed to know their role in society.
According to Marx, the key to understanding the social reality is not found in abstract ideas, but in the factories or in the coal mines, where workers carry out the duties that are beyond the limitations of humanity, to prevent themselves from dying of starvation, in which the unemployed people find dignity as a human being because there is no way aside from it. The capitalist is
In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relat...
The latter part of the nineteenth century was teeming with evolved social and economical ideas. These views of the social structure of urban society came about through the development of ideals taken from past revolutions and the present clash of individuals and organized assemblies. As the Industrial Revolution steamed ahead paving the way for growing commerce, so did the widening gap between the class structure which so predominantly grasped the populace and their rights within the community. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal in the eyes of the bourgeoisie. Using advancing methods of production within a system of free trade, the ruling middle class were strategically able to earn a substantial surplus of funds and maintain their present class of life. Thus, with the advancement of industry and the bourgeoisie's gain of wealth, a counter-action was undoubtably taking place. The resultant was the degradation of the working-class, of the proletarians whom provided labour to a middle-class only to be exploited in doing so. Exploitation is a quarrel between social groups that has been around since the dawn of mankind itself. The persecution of one class by another has historically allowed the advancement of mankind to continue. These clashes, whether ending with positive or negative results, allow Man to evolve as a species, defining Himself within the social structure of nature. Man's rivalry amongst one another allows for this evolution! through the production of something which is different, not necessarily productive, but differing from the present norm and untried through previous epochs.
"History is nothing but the succession of separate generations, each of which exploits the materials, capital, and productive forces handed down to it by all preceding generations." Marx resists any abstraction from this idea, believing that his materialistic ideas alone stand supported by empirical evidence which seems impossible to the Hegelian. His history then begin...
Abel, Donald C., ed. Theories of Human Nature: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
...an agency and free will and thought, which are not taken account for in determinist schools of thought. However, Marx does acknowledge the fact that there are patterns and tendency that may surface, but he also acknowledges and demonstrates that these are not always guaranteed to keep happening. If that was so, then the history of the world would be decided very early on, at its creation, and never change, which is clearly not the case.
Inspired by the works of Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin nonetheless drew his ideology from many other great 19th century philosophers. However, Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” was immensely important to the success of Russia under Leninist rule as it started a new era in history. Viewed as taboo in a capitalist society, Karl Marx started a movement that would permanently change the history of the entire world. Also, around this time, the Populist promoted a doctrine of social and economic equality, although weak in its ideology and method, overall. Lenin was also inspired by the anarchists who sought revolution as an ultimate means to the end of old regimes, in the hope of a new, better society. To his core, a revolutionary, V.I. Lenin was driven to evoke the class struggle that would ultimately transform Russia into a Socialist powerhouse. Through following primarily in the footsteps of Karl Marx, Lenin was to a lesser extent inspired by the Populists, the Anarchists, and the Social Democrats.
The idea of the class struggle is central to both Marx and Darwin's theories. For Marx, it is nothing more than the offspring of capitalist exploitation. This struggle existed long before Marx came into existence. In this struggle, the workers, being exploited, would think about and demand another system where exploitation would be nonexistent. However, since they were at the '...
Karl Marx had very strong viewpoints in regards to capitalism, making him a great candidate for this assignment. People constantly debate over whether his ideologies held any grain of truth to them. I believe that although not everything Marx predicted in his writings has come true (yet), he was definitely right on about a lot of issues. As a matter of fact, his teachings can definitely be applied to today’s society. This paper will give a summary of Marx’s political philosophy. It will also discuss a contemporary issue: the current economic crisis— and how Marx believed racism played a crucial a role in it. Finally, through the lens he has developed, I will explain how Marx would analyze this issue and how one can argue that it spurred the current movement known as Occupy Wall Street.
The Sociological Contribution of Karl Marx to an Understanding of Contemporary Society. This essay will discuss how the Karl Marx contributed his knowledge to the understanding of contemporary society. Karl Marx is often referred to. as the ‘intellectual father of modern day Marxist economics’.
He is known worldwide for his numerous theories and ideas in regards to society, economics and politics. His outlook on these subjects is known as Marxism. Marxism focuses on the imbalance and struggle between classes and society. Marx’s theories stem from the concept of materialism based society and the implications thereof. These concepts leads to the Marxist theory of the failure of capitalism. Marx had a number of specific reasons for the downfall of capitalism yet capitalism remains very real and successful. Marxism covers a wide range of topics and theories, but an in depth analysis of his criticism to capitalism and how it is not relevant to modern day will be explored.