More handpicked essays just for you.
Management and leadership working together
Management and leadership working together
Management and leadership working together
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The role of Justice Organizations is to bring justice to everyone in the world and consequently their administrations must work towards achieving this goal. The way these Justice Organizations are structured affects how well they operate. They have a common goal of ensuring there is justice and they perform several activities in order to achieve this goal. Their leadership and management is very crucial to their operations.
Management of Justice Organizations coordinates the activities of these organizations in order to achieve their goals. Management is important in carrying out the daily activities of Justice Organizations. Managers should budget for the organizations in order to make sure there is no misappropriation of funds (Stojkovic, 2012). Hence a very good management of these organizations will ensure smooth and efficient operation, and as a result there will be justice in the whole world. The leaders of the organizations should motivate their workers to be more hardworking and also oversee the activities of the organization. Leaders of justice organizations are supposed to inspire their workers to
…show more content…
Leaders should to look at the old systems and the older ways of carrying out jurisdiction and actually innovate new and better ways of operations and new systems too. In the case of law enforcers, the leaders are responsible for setting up new courts in several places so as to help those who do not have access to law courts easily (Stojkovic, 2012). . Leaders of corrections should also make sure they set up many rehabilitation centers to help reform some people. Law enforcement leaders are responsible for foreseeing changes in the police department. Leaders of the justice organizations strive to make sure their organizations are independent from any other arm of the government and there is no intrusion from anyone who is a non-member of the
The news reports crime daily. Crime is something that we cannot run from in today’s society; so we depend highly upon the justice system. Criminal Justice is a major concern. Criminal Justice consists of three areas: our police, courts and corrections department. The Criminal Justice system was put in place by these agencies, and established by the governments to help control the crimes and applies penalties to those that violate the law. Many people feel that the criminal justice system is there to protect and serve while others feel that the criminal justice system fails them daily.
Question 1. Both Thomas Mathiesen and Stanley Cohen argue that alternative criminal justice responses that were presented after the 1970s were not real alternatives (Tabibi, 2015a). The ‘alternatives’ which are being questioned are community justice alternatives generally, and Restorative Justice specifically. The argument here is that Restorative Justice cannot be a real alternative because it is itself finished and is based on the premises of the old system (Mathiesen, 1974). Moreover, Restorative Justice is not an alternative, as it has not solved the issues surrounding the penal system (Tabibi, 2015a). Cohen (1985) supports this sentiment, and suggests that community based punishment alternatives have actually led to a widening and expansion
go to the police, or maybe to the government? What if the police and government
67. Doing justice, controlling crime, and preventing crime are the three goals of Criminal Justice. Doing justice is the basis for the rules, procedures, and institutions of the criminal justice system. Criminal justice agencies, supported by the public, are responsible for successfully doing justice. The criminal justice system is designed to control crime by arresting, prosecuting, convicting, and punishing those people who disobey the law. The goal of crime control is rigorously being pursued by police officers, patrol cars, lawyers who speak for a judge, and probation officers who visit clients.
How do we receive justice in the U.S ? First what is Justice, is it “fairness or moral rightness. a scheme or system of law in which every person receives his/ her/its due from the system, including all rights, both natural and legal”(dictionary.com). But do we the people really get a fair trial? Do the people who work for the system and took an oath really care about moral rightness? “One problem is that attorneys, judges and legislators often get caught up more in procedure than in achieving justice for all”(dictionary.com). The justice system has consistently failed underprivileged/poor defendants. In the movie Twelve Angry Men there was a young boy put on trial and accused of murdering his father, his fate was death if pronounced
Agreeing on a definition of restorative justice has proved difficult. One definition is a theory of justice that focuses mostly on repairing the harm caused by criminal behaviour. The reparation is done through a cooperative process that includes all the stakeholders. Restorative justice can also be explained as an approach of justice that aims to satisfy the needs of the victims and offenders, as well as the entire community. The most broadly accepted definition for restorative justice, however, is a process whereby all the parties that have a stake in a specific offence collectively resolve on how to deal with the aftermath. This process is largely focused around reparation, reintegration and participation of victims. That is to say, it is a victim-centred approach to criminal justice, and it perceives crime differently than the adversarial system of justice.
When looking at the Criminal Justice system there are so many different elements make up the system to create a whole, it is sometimes hard to grasp every element. Throughout history people and governments alike have tried to figure out cost saving yet efficient strategies to keep offenders from reoffending and out of jail. Restorative justice is one of these elements; created to focus on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community at large. Within the realm of restorative justice there are many different types of procedures and programs from alternate dispute resolution to veteran trauma courts and everything in-between. Not everyone will agree that these specialty courts and procedures
Justice Justice is defined as the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments. In the case of upholding the law, punishment is the usual assignment. The purposes of punishment include retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and restoration. Although, punishment concepts such as retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation have been around for a while, the concepts of rehabilitation and restoration are fairly new.
Therefore, the fundamental purpose of the Criminal justice system is to maintain order within society and to punish the wrongdoers in a fair and just manner. But what exactly is “justice”? Sobel (2001) defines justice as “the maintenance or administration of that which is just” (p. 170). However, this definition defines justice as a morality and
A law enforcement leader must be able to call people to action, motivate, and lead individuals who otherwise would not react. Gone are the days of leaders leading from a managerial perspective, now more than ever leaders in law enforcement are the patrol officer working the streets and calling to action everyday citizens.
Another function of the OJP is to improve the ways to better assist victims of crime and provide guidance in refining the attitudes, policies and practices that promotes justice and healing for all crime
Social and Economic Justice The term justice, in its simplest state, is defined as “the process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals” (Merriam-Webster). This means that in order to declare if an action is just or not, it is first imperative to set standards as to which actions are deemed acceptable by society and which are not. Once these standards are set, each and every action can be judged based on the previously set standards allowing society to rule whether the action taken is just or not. When it comes to justice, there are several different subsets that must be considered.
Today’s justice system is broken and flawed, with a history of falsely convicting innocent people due to a variety of things, including eyewitness misidentification, invalid or improper forensic testing, and even racial bias on the jury. Many wrongful convictions happen as a result of a combination of these things, and other causes can contribute in each individual case (“causes”). Countless people throughout history have been punished for crimes they did not commit, and with recent advancements in DNA testing bringing about hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted, one has to wonder how many innocents have languished in prisons throughout history. With all the flaws and potential for error in our courtrooms today, justice can not be brought about by our current system; in order to repair it, we need governmental reform to promote true equity and prevent future miscarriages of justice.
Of course there is a challenge in implementing justice. Whether it’s a corrupt justice system, a fragile peace transition, large numbers of perpetrators or victims, and legal impediments such as amnesty laws. People can get justice through fair trials, truth seeking and fact finding, reparations, institutional reform, or memorialization. These mechanisms can be implemented by the national government, United Nations, international organizations or civil society. In order for these mechanisms to be successful they must be victim- centric, pragmatic, empowering, and work in the path of rebuilding trust relationships. Also, to emphasize the balance and for choosing the best strategy for justice, it is necessary to:
The judicial court system aims to achieve justice by upholding the ‘rule of law’, in which everyone is ‘subject to the law and can rely on the law to set the bounds within which other people and governments can operate.’ However, the rule of law does not always work to prevent all injustice, and lawyers should be actively involved in developing and maintaining the rule of law to establish a civil society which can be the foundation of justice for all. This is achieved through the professional identity legal personnel establish, demonstrating the importance of professionalism and resilience in the pursuit of justice and prevention of arbitrary abuse of power. This is observed in the comparison of the different courts and their operation to uphold the rule of law.