Is war necessary? In my opinion, I know war is not the way to solve differences between counties or even the same country. At times leaders and presidents think the only way to get what they want is to fight to get it, when in fact many problems can be solved by negotiating with each other to save lives and also money.
War is not only a waste of time and lives, but also a waste of money, which could be used for many other alternatives such as schools, roads and things to support that country. For instance, in World War ll the total amount spent was four point one trillion dollars, putting WWll behind Afghanistan and Iraq for the most expensive war, with a death toll of about 85 million people. The war between the U.S and Iraq and Afghanistan will cost the taxpayers up to 6 trillion dollars putting it at the very top of the list for the most money spent in warfare at once.
War is a high debate subject in which many could say its justifiable and others would say its just inhuman. In some cases is it necessary? In Harry Browne’s article “Is War Necessary?” under The section “Last Resort” It states “Politicians tell us that diplomacy was tried and failed- and that war was the very, very, very last resort”. Is this true? Not entirely, other alternatives were offered but were they reasonable enough to agree with? I Harry Browne’s article continues on and it informs you that “the politicians didn't try much at all to avoid war. And diplomacy was bound to fail,because it involved our politicians making insensitive demands on a foreign country, demands we had no authority to make, demands that were known in advance to be unacceptable to the foreigners.”
Additionally, it states that “ In the few cases that A...
... middle of paper ...
...Communist controlled territory until the U.S and forces backed the Democrats up, and ran the Viet-Cong out of there trails and tunnels. This is a common fight a country my face over time, and some countries today still are run by Communist groups.
The U.S has faced many of its own problems, such as the Civil War (1861-1865) showed that the difference in farming life and plantations tore the North from the South, in a battle that lasted Four years between our own country was just another disagreement which lead to war, ending with the North at victory.
In conclusion many people could debate whether war is necessary or not, but i know from many articles that it is not the way to help counties, but hurt them. So no matter the difference or argument between two sides, there is a better way to go about these problems then war. Which I have stated from a few articles.
The idea of war and how it can be justified, is a rather trick topic to touch on, as there are diverse ethical and sociological implications that have to be weighed on every step. Mainly we could look at the “Just War Theory” and see how that could possibly apply to the real world. To be able to enter a “Just War” nations must meet six criteria in Jus ad Bellum (Going to War). The criteria is as follows: “Just Cause”, “Right Intention”, “Proper Authority and Public Declaration”, “Last Resort”, “Probability of Success”, and lastly “Proportionality”. However the tricky bit of the Just War theory, is that all six of those elements must be met, to go to war in a morally justifiable way. This could make an easy blockade for nations to veto another nation's effort to enter a war, even if morally justifiable. The problem with an internationally mandated “war-committee”, means that the fate of another nation's well-being could very well be in the hands of a nation with an ulterior motive. It could also fall into the grounds of new found illegal activity. Lets give a hypothetical situation, say nation 'X' wants to go to war with nation 'Y' in an act of self-defence, but it doesn't meet some of the requirements for “Just War theory” and is thus blocked by the war-committee. Then as a consequence, nation 'X' is invaded and annexed due to lack of defence. Nation 'X' could have made an effort to prepare for war, but at the cost of possibly being condemned and sanctioned by the war-committee. In an overall view, it's easy to see why the UN or other major international coalitions will not adopt a system based around Just War Theory.
Wars are mostly unnecessary but necessary in exceptions. Wars can lead to destruction, change, provoke communities and control. I myself a believer of Hinduism. As my culture and religion has taught me that wars is only acceptable when, there is some person who retaliates the human rights and morality of the humans. It is rarely acceptable to just start a war for random minor issues between two different communities. First, always try to solve the problem by vocal means. I have read my religion’s holy book, which is like the bible and it known as Bhagavad Gita. It tells us the story about a very big war between two kings, in there the best archer does not pick up the weapons because he was fighting his own brothers. His brothers were ruling badly and killing innocent people. The god tell the best archer to pick up the weapon and tells him that this are the times when it's a necessity to pick the weapons and start the war. Well that
I think war is only acceptable when it comes to protecting its territory, its people, and its allies. However, if some one s doing something awful that can only stop if the people doing it are stopped then war may occur. For example, Hitler was doing bad things to its people. You can find many pages in the book where it talks about what he did. He put them in gas chambers but teold people they were going to get "disinfected." In cases like this war may be an option. War is often fought over territory, people, resources, ideas/beliefs, and to defend rights. The Warsaw Ghetto rose to fight for their rights.( World History Book 752). Its wrong to start a war where your just going to hurt people and ruin their land just to get something for your
History is full of people fighting against one another and going to war for all types of different reasons. For the most part countries go to war to either protect their way of life, or for a better way of living. We want to preserve certain aspects of life like our rights, as well as helping others gain or maintain them, we also want to be able to prosper as a country. When one or some of these things are threatened a country will go to war. Some wars that fallow this trend include the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II and the Vietnam War. Besides protecting or bettering life, war can also make or break a countries economy.
War is used as a solution to a conflict; two countries that are not getting along usually fight each other for power or to show which is stronger. Many different things cause war, but it all starts with the government. A government that is hungry for power and money would do anything to get what it wants. The more power the government has, the more power they’ll want. Another cause of war is believed to be religion, different religions describe different ideas and understandings, but those different ideas are disagreements over many things. If a government didn’t like another’s idea it causes disagreement, and that means war.
War, in all its forms, is tragic. International law was created to establish some basis of rules to abide by—including war—and states have signed on to such a contract. The actions of states in this ever globalizing world are difficult to be controlled. The source of international law operates through the hands of the United Nations. The enforcement of the law occurs through reciprocity, collective action, and a display of international norms (Goldstein, p. 254). War in fact has been given a justification, though it is arguable whether or not the basis of the idea is correct. Wars can be just under certain conditions.
War is an organized and often prolonged conflict by a leader that is carried out by states or non-state actors and is generally characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. Now, some may say that war is needed for a country to succeed as would the Italian philosopher by the name Nicollo Machiavelli who explains characteristics and plans that these war leaders must follow in order to succeed. However, some also may say that war is a path of evil and a country should live in peace as taught by an ancient Chinese philosopher by the name of Lao Tzu. Equally important that these two different ideals may be, countries can use some of the ideas from both philosophers to help in times of battle.
“War, it will be seen, not only accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way” (Orwell 158). Most people agree that war is a terrible thing, but it can also be used as a tool to guarantee peace. In the book 1984, by George Orwell, the government slogan “War is Peace” is true because the government’s peace relies almost entirely on the people’s belief that they are at war.
Can war be justified for any party or any reason? The answer is “No.” St. Augustine enunciated that a war can be justified only “when it is fought for a just cause” (qtd. in “Peace and War”). But what is a “just cause”? Everybody has a different definition and it can be totally subjective. In most modern cultures or most countries, war is accepted as an effective and justifiable way of protecting national interests and achieving diplomatic goals. It can be the just cause as St. Augu...
War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.” (Peter S. Themes. The Just War)
War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by the human race. There are many different reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party and anger burns with a fiery passion, war is the last remaining option. Obviously, the purpose of any war is to win. How are wars won? Perhaps if we were to ask a member of the Defense Department during the early stages of the war in Iraq, his answer might be, “To win this war we must force the enemy into submission by means of ethical warfare.” If we were to ask a marine in the Second World War what he was told by his commanding officer he would reply, “To close with the enemy and destroy him.” (Fussell, 763).
The Vietnam War was the cause of multiple causalities in both America and Vietnam. For example, according to “The Costs of The Vietnam War”, as many as 58,000 American troops were killed, about 150,000 troops were injured, and about 1,600 troops were missing. On the other hand, about 660,000 people from South Vietnam were killed and about 1,550,000 people for North Vietnam were killed. This shows the amount of bloodbath that occurred from this single war. North Vietnam had so many causalities it was about the same amount of 1.5% of Vietnam’s (As a Whole) population today. Therefore, showing that the Vietnam War devastated Vietnam’s population. Furthermore, there were many other costs to the Vietnam War. Some of these costs come from the cost of weapons, transportation, and supplies. America spent about $111 billion dollars during the war to pay for these needs. $111 billion dollars was worth muc...
...al advancements in the terms of civil, medical, and defensive advancements. At the same time, it has a galvanizing effect on economy through not only new innovations, but a lower unemployment rate and higher per capita output. War has saved economies from disaster, promoted the welfare of health, and the quality of life for not just humans. War may be hell, and it may be wrong, but war is certainly necessary.
War is such a debatable topic of whether it is just to wage a war on our neighbours or invade a country.One thing is very clear there are consequence and a cost. Martin Luther once stated,“War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity, it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families”. This was exactly what did. War was not a fun game like what Jessie Pope described it as in her poem, ‘Who’s for the game’. What war did was it changed people and society. The war caused soldiers to suffer from PTSD, it left families to face the feeling of grief and it crippled the economy.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.