Julius Caesar: The Justice Of The Republic

159 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Julius caesar impact on society

Caesar was more concerned with his power than the justice of the Republic. Including before his consulship ended, he got the Senate to grant him a five-year term as commander in Gaul, a province he could call his own (p.65). Treasure and military glory to rival Crassus and Pompey were ripe for the picking in the new provinces from Gaul (p.65). In addition, when Caesar crossed the Rubicon River after returning from Gaul, he refused to disband his army. To Pompey this was seen as a declaration of war on Rome (p.69). In doing this, Caesar suggest that his needs and wants are more important than the safety and legislation of Rome. This matters because Caesar is once again showing the future leader that is within him. He is selfish, cocky, and overly

Show More
Related

  • How Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the Roman republic

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...

    Read More

  • Comparative Study: Assassinations of Caesar and Lincoln

    1141 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this case, the rise of Caesar’s power was considered by some as disregard and disrespect of authority, tradition, and Roman rules. Caesar on many occasions challenged Roman commander Pompey and his main opponent, thus leading to many civil wars. Additionally, his decision to cross Rubicon was contrary to the Roman law that restricted him to enter Rome because he was a governor of Gaul at the time. Additionally, following Pompey’s death, Caesar conferred more powers to himself by diluting the Senate’s reaches and powers (Alvin 82). One major flaw that Caesar possessed was his strong ambition. This made him overconfident and thought he had become invincible both in Rome and battle. Because his soldiers respected and loved him, Caesar thought that he would pursue whatever he desired. This is what led to his

    Read More

  • Vergil and Caesar Unite Under War

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Caesar sees himself as a protector of the Romans against the northern attackers, he wages war against those who threaten his city. Here, he recalled the great failure—when the Helvetians showed no remorse and killed the Consul of Rome and enslaved his legion. Caesar does not let the Helvetians pass through the Province because of the memory of the killed Consul. In Book I, Chapter 7 of Commentarii de Bello Gallico, it says, “Caesar, inasmuch as he kept in remembrance that Lucius Cassius, the consul, had been slain, and his army routed and made to pass under the yoke by the Helvetii, did not think that [their request] ought to be granted: nor was he of opinion that men of hostile disposition, if an opportunity of marching through the Province were given them, would abstain from outrage and mischief.” This shows the constant war between Rome and invaders and it drives Caesar to pursue his goals, such as, killing the Helvetians—making him a powerful force .

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar and the Fall of the Roman Republic

    2913 Words  | 6 Pages

    How was it possible that under the dictatorship and after the deification of Julius Caesar the Roman republic fell, when it had been structurally sound for four centuries before? When the republic was established around the end of the 6th century B.C.E., the Romans made clear that they wished to avoid all semblance of the monarchy that had ruled for two centuries before. (T.J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), London and New York: Routledge, 1995; p. 215) The rule of the Republic was to be split into powers of the senate and consuls, a system that worked for over four centuries. The republic would face problems with the rise of the first triumvirate in 60 B.C.E., involving Julius Caesar, Crassus and Pompey. The triumvirate gained power that was intended to be in the hands of the senate and Roman assembly. This paved way to a situation in which a single man could sweep up the political power that previously belonged to the entire senate. Julius Caesar would use this tactic, following his campaigns of Gaul and Britton, to take sole dictatorship over Rome. While there were previous cases which individuals had been appointed as dictator, usually by the senate to serve for six months in a time of war, Caesar was appointed dictator three separate times.. After declining his first dictatorship, Caesar was awarded two more reigns as dictator for one and ten years, respectively. At this point Caesar was praised by the Roman people for his various military victories and had been awarded several awards and honors by the senate. Having conquered much of the surrounding territories, spanning from northern Africa to Greece, and enacting several reforms, Caesar was in the pro...

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar, The Selfish Dictator

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a Roman general, statesman, Consul, and author of Latin prose. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. On March 15 44 B.C.E, the Roman dictator Julius Caesar was murdered. There are multiple accounts of this incident, while all accounts came after the death of Caesar, the writing on the incident portray Julius Caesar to have been a selfish dictator.

    Read More

  • Suetonius In Julius Caesar

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    He believed that not only does a man need to have authority over his people, but he also has to confidently be able to lead no matter what circumstances are thrown his way. Caesar was faced with bribery, being overwhelmed by power, and so many other things. Though the hardships were apparent and caused him to lose sight of himself, he concerned with the greatness of Rome. At the end of the day, to Suetonius, that was the bigger picture. The Roman Republic definitely experienced many trials and tribulations. The man who were put in charge of it, tried their best to succeed when it came to conducting things in such a manner that would benefit the citizens of Rome, but after each one of their reigns, it seemed as if once a new leader came into power, all of the hard worked that was established quickly plunged due to the inconsistency with the rules set in

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Power In Julius Caesar

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    Honor and power is what drives the conspirators to assassinate Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Caesar is now the single leader of Rome, and members of the Senate have concerns that he will abuse his sole power. Therefore, they plot and accomplish the assassination of Caesar in an attempt to rebuild the balance of Rome. Rome falls into chaos with an unknown future with no central leader for the people to follow. In Act I, Scene 2, Cassius, a member of the Senate, explains to his friend, Brutus, that Caesar is not the god he makes himself out to be. Instead, he argues both he and Brutus are equal to Caesar and are just as deserving of the throne. Cassius’ speech to Brutus diminishes Caesar’s godly demeanor through

    Read More

  • Free Julius Caesar Essays: The Tragic Hero

    487 Words  | 1 Pages

    Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar A tragic hero is the character whose actions deeply affect the other characters and who creates a series of events that eventually lead to the character’s downfall and the downfall of his loved ones. Such a hero possesses a flaw in character that influences his actions and thinking and especially his judgments. In logically determining who the hero in Julius Caesar is, one simply must find the one character who fits the above guidelines. Marcus Brutus is the only one, and, thus, he is the tragic hero.

    Read More

  • The Civil War: Why Was The Civil War Inevitable?

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crossing the Rubicon was the first act of war against Pompey. By crossing the Rubicon, Caesar no longer had an option but to attack Rome. Caesar tried to collect a fleet quickly to cross the sea and beat Pompey before he was able to strengthen his ships (Civil Wars by Julius Caesar). Once Caesar crossed the Rubicon, the Civil War officially started, leaving Caesar with no option but to continue fighting against Pompey and attacking Rome. However, the war was not only about who would remain in power, but also how the state would be ran, and everything about its future. The soldiers and citizens were not only continuing to fight because Caesar crossed the Rubicon, but also to support the leader whose political views were similar to there’s. Thus, creating an army of troops and supporters behind each leader, forcing them to continue

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Comparsion

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many of the problems that Julius Caesar faced during his rule are still problems that the world still faces today. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar the problems are clearly evident. The main problem is the inherit distrust in people of government that is caused by unstable governments.

    Read More

  • Caesars Conquest Of Gaul

    2383 Words  | 5 Pages

    In previous years, Caesar had relied upon the wealth and prestige of others in order to further his own political and military ambitions. Before his governorship of Cisalpine Gaul, he relied heavily upon the financial support of Crassus (whom was his main creditor) to gain favour with the Roman public. However, with his appointment as proconsul of Cisalpine Gaul and Illyricum in 58 B.C.E, Caesar saw an opportunity to increase his own wealth and prestige without relying upon the support of others. To his command of Cisalpine Gaul, he was also later given the command of Transalpine Gaul. His command of the Gallic region had several advantages. Firstly, the Po Valley was an excellent recruiting ground for troops. Secondly through Gaul, Caesar had an opportunity to acquire great wealth, which would be needed to fur...

    Read More

  • Free Julius Caesar Essays: Honorable Men in Julius Caesar

    430 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Cassius are both considered honorable men by the public.  But, like all traits, honor is in the eye of the beholder.  Honor is defined as evidence or symbols of distinction.  Those who are placed in power are often chosen because of their traits, which include being honorable.  If those in power have any faults, it could diminish their position in the eyes of the public.

    Read More

  • Assassination of Julius Caesar

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Caesar was a brilliant general, a clever engineer, and administrator of genius, and a leader who demanded and commanded loyalty. He also was a corrupt politician” (Dando-Collins 4). Caesar would go on to be a dictator and his gain in power would corrupt him. He often bypassed the Senate, taking their power away. With Caesar’s growing power the Senate feared that they would soon lose their political relevance.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar - A Tragic Hero

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout many of Shakespeare's plays, a tragic hero is identified; a heroic figure that possesses a character flaw that leads to his defeat. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there has been controversies over who is actually the tragic hero. Many people agree that Marcus Brutus is the tragic hero. However, others argue and identify Julius Caesar as the tragic hero. After examining these two characters, a conclusion is easily drawn. Brutus is the tragic hero of this play because when a person who possesses such heroic qualities dies, it is a true tragedy.

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar: The Justice Of The Republic

Open Document