Julius Caesar: The Fall Of The Roman Republic

629 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Julius Caesar Shakespeare

There was a man called called Julius Caesar . He was the dictator of the roman people . But he was murdered by many of the senators, many who were his friends. What led to julius Ceasar death was the result of a conspiracy by many of the senators. Led by Gaius Cassius Longinus, Decimus Junius, and Marcus Junius, they planned and successfully stabbed Julius Caesar to death in the location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march. At that time he was the dictator of the roman republic, having been recently declared dictator perpetuo by the senate. This declaration made several senators fear that Julius had wanted to overthrow the senate in favor of tyranny. Which led to the assassination of the emperor. The conspirators were unable to restore the roman republic. The ramification led to the liberators civil war and, ultimately, to the principate the period of the roman empire. After julius was killed Octavius was named in Caesar will as his adopted son and heir, their known as Octavianus. He, Mark Antony, and Marcus lepidus formed the second triumvirate to defeat the assassins of Caesar. Follow their victory at the battle of philippi, the triumvirate divided the roman republic among themselves and ruled as military dictators. The triumvirate was …show more content…

In reality however, he retained his autocratic power over the republic as military dictator. By law, Augustus held a collection of powers granted to him for life by the senate, including supreme military command, and those of tribute and censor. It took several years for Augustus to develop the framework within which a formally republican state could be led under his sole role. He rejected monarchical titles, and instead called himself princeps, the first phase of the roman

Show More
Related

  • How Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the Roman republic

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar and the Fall of the Roman Republic

    2913 Words  | 6 Pages

    The triumvirate gained power that was intended to be in the hands of the Senate and Roman Assembly. This paved way to a situation in which a single man could sweep up the political power that previously belonged to the entire Senate. Julius Caesar would use this tactic, following his campaigns of Gaul and Britton, to take sole dictatorship over Rome. While there were previous cases in which individuals had been appointed as dictators, usually by the Senate, to serve for six months in a time of war, Caesar was appointed dictator three separate times.. After declining his first dictatorship, Caesar was awarded two more reigns as dictator for one and ten years, respectively.

    Read More

  • The Political Decay of the Roman Republic

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ion this all showed that style of governing and ruling an empire started a century long pattern of events that eventually lead to the fall and destruction of the old oligarchy led by the Senate. The combination of desire for personal gain and glory of a politician or general was what weakened the Roman customs and the Senate. This was a cycle among the Senate, to find themselves stuck in a problem and to find others to fix with of course military means but in turn make everything more corrupt with their disruptive practices such as Pompey and Julius Caesar. But they were not the only ones there were others who were to blame for causing such decay and corruption such as Marius, Sulla, Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus. They were the ones who kept this corruption cycle going and it was Augustus Caesar who finally broke the cycle and brought stability and order back to Rome.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Dbq

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite to many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decisions, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar. Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar, on March 15.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar, The Selfish Dictator

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a Roman general, statesman, Consul, and author of Latin prose. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. On March 15 44 B.C.E, the Roman dictator Julius Caesar was murdered. There are multiple accounts of this incident, while all accounts came after the death of Caesar, the writing on the incident portray Julius Caesar to have been a selfish dictator.

    Read More

  • The Fall of the Roman Republic

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Much ink from the historians’ pens has been spilled seeking to explain the reasons behind the fall of the Roman Republic. As Gruen notes, “from Montesquieu to Mommsen, from Thomas Arnold to Eduard Meyer…the Republic’s calamity has summoned forth speculation on a grand scale. How had it come about?” (1) Certainly, from one perspective, it can be said that the attraction of this event is to a degree overstated: it is based on the belief of the stability of political systems, of the deterrence of the possibility of radical changes in political worldviews and general social arrangements and structures. Furthermore, it marks a decisive shift, in the political arrangements of a grand civilization of Ancient Rome: in other words, it marks an instance where even within the continuity of a singular civilization, such as that of Rome, there can be the presence of political turbulence and abrupt changes of directions regarding the form which political power and hegemony ultimately assumes. Yet, what is perhaps more important from the perspective of the historian is the precise sense in which the events of the collapse of the Roman Republic still remain ambiguous, arguably because of the multi-faceted manner in which this fall occurred. Hence, Gruen writes: “the closing years of the Roman Republic are frequently described as an era of decay and disintegration; the crumbling of institutions and traditions; the displacement of constitutional procedures by anarchy and forces; the shattering of ordered structures, status and privilege; the stage prepared for inevitable autocracy.” (1) In other words, the collapse of the Roman Republic is complicated because of the multiple dimensions in which such degeneration ultimately happened: it was not mere...

    Read More

  • The Rise Of The Roman Republic

    830 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the problems starting with the dissolution of the first triumvirate and the actions of Julius Caesar, it seemed almost inevitable that the Republic would become an Empire. With the death of the true republican, Cicero, and many not remembering what the republic was like, giving power to the capable and honorable man seemed as if the best answer. Furthermore, if the Rome continue to remain a Republic the Senate could not have maintained the success or power that the Empire held. The ambition of one man made it easy to continue the growth whereas, many of the policies and disputes the country faced had face might have taken to long or complicated had the republic

    Read More

  • Augustus's Influence On Roman Architecture

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    Augustus changed the image of Roman leadership through art and architecture. Prior to Augustus gaining power, his great-uncle and adopted father, Julius Caesar was killed. Caesar’s death marked great change for the history of the Roman Republic. Augustus, then named Octavian went to Rome to avenge Caesar’s death and soon became a great warrior involved in the Second Triumvirate. Not long after forming alliances with Mark Antony and Lepidus, Augustus gained full control of all Roman territories. When he gained power of Rome, the influence of art was used differently. Art was used as a tool to show his political image across the population. Additionally, one of the most important aspects of Augustus’ rule is showing his relationship to Julius

    Read More

  • Octavian, the Greatest Roman Leader

    1668 Words  | 4 Pages

    Octavian enabled the long, nonviolent time of the Pax Romana, (Latin for Roman peace) by changing Rome from a frail, collapsing republican government to a powerful empire. He is known as the first, and one of the greatest, Roman Emperors ever. Octavian was born on September 23, 63 BC, and died in 14 AD. Born with the name Gaius Octavius Thurinus, he was adopted posthumously by his great-uncle Gaius Julius Caesar via his will, and then was named Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. This happened in 44 BC when his great uncle, Julius Caesar, was assassinated by a group of conspirators. Additionally, he received the name “Augustus” a term meaning “the revered one” from the Roman Senate in 27 BC. Because of the various names he had, it is common to call him Octavius while referring to the events that between 63 and 44 BC, Octavian when referring to events between 44 and 27 BC, and Augustus when referring to events after 27 BC. Octavian is arguably the single most important figure in Roman history. Ever since he was a young boy, he was destined to become the next great leader. For example, Octavian along with his friend Marcus Agrippa went to visit the Sibyl of Cumae (oracle). When the Sibyl saw him, she bowed at his feet and said that he would be the next great leader. He did not believe her at the time, but just a few years later Julius Caesar would be dead and he would have power. Over the course of his long and spectacular career as “Principate,” he put an end to the collapse of the Republic, and established a system that would stand in the Roman government for three centuries.

    Read More

  • History of the Roman Empire

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 44 bc Gaius Julius Caesar, the Roman leader who ruled the Roman Republic as a dictator, was assassinated

    Read More

  • Rise of the Roman Republic

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rome became a powerful empire engulfing much of Europe, North Africa, and parts of Asia and what seemed like this great entity called the Romans were always in the search of more territory and land to conquer and assimilate into their ever growing vast empire. However, this was not always the case, before Rome became one of the greatest empires in all of history, Rome was a republic. They were government consisted of a Senate who much like our country today represented certain classes of the citizens of the Republic. During the growth and rise of the Roman republic conquering neighboring territories and competing for land grabs was not Romans primary objectives. Romans believed in the well being and wealth of Rome, and if that meant the total destruction of a potential adversary, then as history will show that is unfortunately to the detriment of the adversary what happened.

    Read More

  • The Rome Republic: The Success Of The Roman Republic

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Republic had an upstanding infrastructure, a stable social system, and a balanced constitution that solidified Rome’s greatness. Regardless of its achievements, however, the Roman Republic owes much of its success to classical Greek cultures. These cultures, in conjunction with the fundamental values of Roman society, certified Rome as one of the most significant powers the world has ever seen.

    Read More

  • The Fall of The Roman Republic

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC after the ruling Tarquins abused their extensive power as monarchs and were overthrown. The goal of the Roman Republic was to have a strong government, governed equally by the patricians and the plebians, and to avoid another Roman Monarchy. For years Rome was guided by great men, such as Cincinnatus and Scipio Africanus, who led the Republic through hard times, conquering such enemies as the Etruscans and the Carthaginians. Large-scale war united Roman society in its common goals. However, after Scipio’s victory at Zama in 202 BC, a new Roman world began to take shape. Roman soldiers returned home from their victory to find that they could not pay for their farms, becoming “squatters” on their own lands after having to sell them to richer men. The Senate became corrupted, and despite the Gracchi brothers’ best efforts, the rich patricians soon monopolized nearly all aspects of the Republic, from trading and “farming” to governing the people. After marching on Rome, Sulla became dictator in 82 BC. After Sulla, the First Triumvirate: Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar, owned virtually all power in Rome, yet each had his own desire to defeat the other two and become Emperor. When Crassus died in battle, Caesar had his chance. He defeated Pompey and marched on Rome, victorious. After declaring himself Dictator for Life, Caesar was assassinated, and another Civ...

    Read More

  • Assassination of Julius Caesar

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    Caesar’s power in Rome was growing, and people were afraid he was going to turn Rome into a monarchy. However, Caesar did not want to be known as a king, but he was appointed dictator for life.

    Read More

  • Biography of Julius Caesar

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...on, Octavian, took the name of Augustas Caesar and assumed complete control of the Roman Empire. After Caesar was assassinated, Octavian defeated the forces that murdered his uncle. Returning in 27 B.C., Octavian stated that he was restoring the republic. The Senate appointed him as the first emperor. Although the Republic died along with Caesar, a new era in Roman History began.

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar: The Fall Of The Roman Republic

Open Document