Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

639 Words2 Pages

In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony and Brutus make a speech at Caesar’s funeral, Caesar has been assassinated, Mark Antony and Brutus are currently trying to gain power through manipulation during Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses parallelism, logos and pathos for his speech. Brutus uses either/thinking and ethos in his speech at Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses logos and pathos while Brutus uses ethos and parallelism in their speeches to persuade and manipulate their audiences. The form of persuasion Antony used managed to gain back the people’s loyalty. Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s.

In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    384 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare employs various rhetorical strategies such as direct address, repetition, and apostrophe in Antony’s eulogy to convince the crowd into believing that Caesar was a good ruler. His excellent use of rhetoric begins before he starts his speech through the establishment of familiarity. Before Antony begins his speech, he refers to the crowd as “friends, romans, [and] countrymen” to establish a personal connection, indicating the use of direct address (3.2.82). By referring to the crowd as “friends,” Antony removes any separation between him and the audience, establishing a close bond by choice. As it came first on his list, it emphasizes the importance of his friendship with the audience as friendship implies

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis: A Persuasive Balance

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this day and age, persuasion can be seen on almost any screen. The average American views thousands of advertisements every week. Most ads are simply pushed out of a person’s mind, but the successful advertisements are the ones that resonate with people. Some forms of ads are very annoying to those who put up with them constantly. Online pop-up ads, for example, are proven to do worse for products and business than no advertising at all! This is because this form of advertising does nothing to convince or persuade the person viewing the ad, and no effort is put into actually put into proving what it’s worth to make a point. Pop-ads make zero use of something known as “rhetorical devices”. In Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both try to convey their point of view to a large audience of Roman citizens. One had a better speech than the other since he used “rhetorical devices” more effectively. Logos (logical; what makes sense), Ethos (ethics and morals; portraying similar beliefs and values), and Pathos (emotions; natural feelings that can be counterintuitive to logos) are the rhetorical devices that Aristotle

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Flaws

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    Universal Imperfections Human beings often choose to characterize others as either bad or good. Those who are deemed bad are said to be villains, and those who are deemed good are said to be heroes. In reality, there are no definite heroes and villains. The world is full of universally imperfect people.

    Read More

  • Marcus Tullius Cicero: Rhetorical Analysis

    1565 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Do you not feel that your plans are detected? Do you not see that your conspiracy is already arrested and rendered powerless by the knowledge which everyone here possesses of it?” (Cicero). Marcus Tullius Cicero was born on January 3, 106 BCE in modern-day Arpino, Lazio, Italy, where he served as Consul of the Roman Republic for a year in 63 BCE (Rawson, 303). While in office, Cicero was conspired against by Lucius Cataline in an attempt to kill a number of senators to overtake the Roman Republic in the Second Catilinarian Conspiracy (Clayton). Upon learning of Cataline’s intentions, Cicero gave an oration to the Senate in the Temple of Jupiter Stator against Cataline, to which he was surprisingly in attendance, in order to address him and his conspirators proclaiming his knowledge of their plans. Cicero was able to stop the conspiracy and avoid the Republic from falling into the hands of his opposition. Through the execution of five conspirators and the fleeing of Cataline, Cicero was able to put down the rebellion efficiently (Clayton). Cicero’s elaborate use of rhetorical questions, analogies, and mood precipitates an effective message that saves the course of the

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    1042 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar was a remarkable Roman Consul who constantly strove to increase the power of his empire. During the Gallic Wars, Caesar fought against several Gallic tribes in attempt to become the sole ruler of the Roman Empire. Caesar expresses his thoughts on this war in his book De Bello Gallico. In this work, Caesar uses many different writing techniques to convince the audience that the war happened in the way he described and therefore make his view on the war credible. Caesar's techniques of writing in mostly indirect statement as well as using powerful adjectives to describe himself comes off very confusing to the audience. Because Caesar is very confident in his writing, as shown through the excessive amounts of detail he includes,

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Without knowing it, we are very accustomed to the old saying "Save the best for last." In social events and sporting competitions, those in charge use their best to leave a greater impact on their opponents and their audience. We can also see this being used while watching a firework display and the most grand fireworks appear only at the end of the show. William Shakespeare's most famous tragedy, Julius Caesar, is a great example of the saying. In Act III, Scene II of the play, the city of Rome is in mourning after their leader was murdered by conspirators consisting of the city's own Senators. Romans gather near the Roman Senate House to hear Brutus and Marc Anthony's words. By the end of Brutus' speech, the crowd is supporting his actions and justifying him, but by the end of the scene, they are supporting Anthony. What exactly did Anthony say and do to convince the Romans to support his claims and oppose Brutus so much

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare which appears to be a classic. In this poem there are many important events that occur. One of many, the speeches given at Julius Caesar's funeral. Both Mark Antony and Brutus speak to the audience in hope of comfort for all. The speeches also serve to persuade and convince the people of the truth. Each say their own story and convince the audience, but only one truly succeeds. Although they both use ethos, pathos and logos, classical appeals, only one is able to use them to his advantage and accomplish his goal. The one speaker who achieves his goal is Mark Anthony because he uses the classical appeals to connect to the audience, make facts useful and is able to make the audience and himself all feel equal and united.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    George Orwell once said, “Confession is not betrayal. What you say or do doesn't matter; only feelings matter. If they could make me stop loving you-that would be the real betrayal”. Brutus cherishes Rome with his heart, for he was an honorable man who murdered his closest friend, Caesar, after reading false letters by Cassius that further encouraged him to act against Caesar’s thrill of power. Surprisingly, Brutus has stabbed Caesar with his blade, showing rebellion against what Caesar and his people have stood for. Consequently, portraying Brutus as a sellout and a murder in the hearts of many, to forever be known as a betrayer to his former comrade and his nation. With that being said, however, there’s nothing to clarify that Brutus had

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Antony asks rhetorical questions and lets the audience answer for themselves. Brutus uses ethos by stating that he a noble man and that is why the people should believe him but infact Antony questions his nobility by saying what Brutus said,” Brutus is an honourable man”(III.ii.79). In a way, Antony states what Brutus states to convince the audience by using examples that Brutus is wrong. Antony himself knows what kind of man Brutus is but lets the people figure it out on their own. In addition, Brutus uses logos by expressing that fact that Caesar died because of his ambition. This argument is severely under supported because his reasons are invalid and simply observations. Antony uses “did this in Caesar seem ambitious” to question Brutus’ argument (III.ii.82). Antony gives examples backing his argument like when Caesar refused the crown thrice to prove his humbleness. The way Antony convinces the people to rebel is by using pathos. He brings the audience in by stepping down to their level and showing them the body of Caesar. While Antony talks at Caesar's funeral, he pauses because” heart us in the coffin there with Caesar “(III.ii.98). When Antony becomes emotional, he reminds the audience about what injust event happened to the much loved

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Allusion Analysis

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Act 3, scene 2, Polonius states an allusion to Julius Caesar, a Roman dictator of around 44 B.C. Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” was likely written at around the same time as “Hamlet,” and thus it is most likely the subject matter in his mind when writing the other. This allusion refers to Caesar's assassination by his comrade Brutus. It is especially important because it reminds us of King Hamlet’s murder by Claudius as well as young Hamlet's quest to avenge his father's death. In this one allusion, Shakespeare is able to tie in several themes in the play: revenge, betrayal, and death. In this Act, there are undeniably allusions related to mythology, which was an interest at that time. Mythological characters were familiar to the Elizabethans.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Essay

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rome is thought of as one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen. And the greatest ruler of the greatest empire, possibly the entire world, is Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar is known today to be a trustworthy, fair and brave leader, but you don’t become the greatest leader to ever live by not succeeding. He understood this and he was successful beyond measure.

    Read More

  • The Power of Rhetoric in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... been a totally different story. Cassius tries to turn brutus against Caesar and does turn out to be successful. Later, Brutus and Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus appeals to logic and the crowd is initially on his side. Antony appeals more to emotion, and the crowd consents with him much more than Brutus. This leads to havoc and a mutiny against the conspirators. It is conspicuous that Antony is the most convincing character in the play because of his use of appealing to the mental state of others. He is also humble, yet deceptive. To conclude, persuasion and rhetoric are essential factors in the death of Julius Caesar and the events that trail the tragedy.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Essay

    552 Words  | 2 Pages

    A lot is learned about Julius Caesar in the first two acts of Shakespeare’s play. One of his qualities includes being superstitious. In act one scene two, Caesar tells Mark Antony to touch Calpurnia’s stomach while he passes by in the race “for our elders say the barren touchèd in this holy chase, shake off their sterile curse.” Caesar believes that by having an athletic man touch her stomach, Calpurnia, a barren woman, will be able to bear children. However, Caesar sees this superstitious behavior as a weakness, and Julius Caesar does not show weakness. When the Soothsayer warned Caesar to “beware the Ides of March” in the same scene, he passed it off as silly and ignored the warning. Caesar thought that if he showed fear, then others would think he is not fit for the throne. At that time in the play, all the people of Rome seemed thrilled to offer Caesar the crown. They were almost desperate, and Caesar used that advantage to quench his need to be fawned over. When Casca is telling Cassius and Brutus what happened with Caesar, he tells them that Caesar was offered the crown twice ...

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Critical Analysis Essay

    1007 Words  | 3 Pages

    Suggestive comedies along with historical and romantic tragedies have been Shakespeare’s trademark genres among his various world-renowned writings. One such piece, Julius Caesar, concentrates upon the fall of the Roman emperor Caesar and the events following his demise at the hands of his trusted politicians and friends. The play itself does not simply explore the downfall of Caesar, but also of his comrades in light of their actions. As the Ides of March hang above Caesar’s head in a perfect foreshadow, so too do other actions allude to the inevitable death of those who seek Caesar’s fall. The foreshadowing that Shakespeare includes in his work resemble melancholy poetry as it illustrates not only the action to arise, but the character who will face the unfortunate outcome. Along with its’ elements of foreshadowing, the story, in accordance with its’ historical context of the ancient Roman government, depicts the consequences of the envious and the benevolent individuals whose stars were fated to serve as an example.

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document