Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar life story
Julius Caesar’s context & rise to prominence
Aristotle views on rhetoric
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Julius Caesar’s Funeral Julius Caesar is one of the best known historical figures to come out of ancient Rome; he is also the basis of William Shakespeare’s tragedy called Julius Caesar, although this heavily contrasts the actual events. Taking place in ancient Rome; the main character of Brutus begins to fear for the future of Rome when he learns that his arrogant, and presumptuous friend, Julius Caesar, could possibly become king. In response to this he goes along with a conspiracy to kill Caesar. After Caesar has died Brutus, and Caesar's dear friend Antony speak at his funeral. At the funeral Brutus gives a speech about why Caesar needed to die, conversely Antony gives a speech about why the killing of Caesar was appalling, pertinent and unnecessary. He presents a much more intensive and persuasive speech, using plentiful rhetorical devices. One illustration of how Antony’s speech is superior to Brutus’ speech, is Antony’s application of …show more content…
Ordinarily Brutus tries to appeal to the ethics of the people, by expressing his personal opinion. Antony also uses an ethical appeal, but he supports it with factual events. Throughout his speech he doesn’t once mention his opinion, instead he just gives examples of facts that would cause people support his side, without making them realize that's his intent. By specifically telling them just his opinion without supporting it with facts Brutus basically told the people what to believe, while Antony told them that these are the facts, but they can believe what they wish. The facts Antony tells are all, instances the plebeians know to be true, consequently his logos has an even greater effect. A couple examples of this are Caesar’s refusal of the crown, and the fact that the people addressed were once in support of him. Near the end of the speech, Antony brings up Caesar’s
Brutus used logos and rhetorical questions as a rhetorical technique in his speech at Caesar’s funeral to persuade and inform the audience about why his death was necessary. However, Antony used more pathos and repetition in his speech. This allowed him to connect with the audience on an emotional level, which was more persuading than Brutus’s method.
Antony explains that he’s not gifted with the art of speech like Brutus is, and hence all he can do is speak plainly, as a man who loved Caesar, furthermore demonstrating his appeal to ethos. The phrase uses irony, as Antony tries to place himself as a commoner, in an attempt to incite the crowd to fight against Brutus and the conspirators. Through the use of ad hominem, Antony lowers Brutus’ ethos, causing the crowd to perceive Antony as a more reliable and trustworthy person. Antony targets the questionable character of Brutus as evident in the phrase “Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony describes Brutus as “honourable” throughout the oration, at first seeming to praise him, but each time, changing his tone to a more mocking and sarcastic one. The use of sarcasm and irony, undermines Brutus’s character and attacks his ethos, thus allowing Antony to persuade the crowd and this causes them to lose their faith in Brutus. Antony then sums up his speech stating “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke.” outlining the irony used by Antony, allowing him to persuade the crowd against the conspirators without directly saying that the conspirators did anything
Before Antony gave his speech, Brutus had labeled Caesar as ambitious and used this reason to justify the murder. To rebut, Antony points out that Caesar “hath brought many captives home to Rome,/ whose ransoms did, the general coffers hill” (III, ii, 90-92). Antony gives an example of logos by saying that Caesar gained wealth and land for Rome and not himself, demonstrating that Caesar acts for the good of his country and not for his own ambitions. Antony supports his rebuttal to Brutus’ claim once again later in his speech by reminding the plebeians how he “thrice presented [Caesar] with a kingly crown,/ which he did thrice refuse” (III, ii, 97-98). Again, Antony proves that Caesar was not ambitious because he refused the crown, a symbol of wealth and power. These facts that the plebeians are all aware of speak to their logic and help sway them to Antony’s
Shakespeare's Julius Caesar recounts the murder of Rome’s idol, Julius Caesar, to the suicide of Brutus, Caesar’s closest friend. Members of the senate conspire to murder Caesar in attempt to avoid his reign while Brutus’ righteous cause is to protect Rome. After Caesar’s death, Brutus speaks among the Romans in attempt to appease their anger for the death of their beloved icon. He delivers a speech expressing his cause for Caesar’s murder and his love for Rome using emotion, reason, and credibility to convince the Romans that his cause intended to Rome.
Brutus questions the audience with this question, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free man?” Logically, one would want to be free than enslaved. This line justifies why he kills Caesar to the audience. Brutus says he did it to save Rome. However, Antony’s use of logo is more directly used to make the audience feel bad for killing Caesar. It is found in the reading of the will. He says “To every Roman citizen he gives, to every several man, seventy-five drachmas.” The line would make the audience feel shameful for killing Caesar. While this shows pathos, the logos in this is when Antony shows that Caesar cared so much about his people he left them money. This help influence the mind change of the
Julius Caeser is a play written by William Shakespeare. It is about the life and death of the Roman leader, Caeser. One of the most important scenes in the story is when Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches at Caeser's funeral. While there are some similarities in their speeches at the funeral, there are also many differences.
He questions whether Caesar is actually ambitious like what Brutus described with a few examples of what Caesar has done. For example, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept. Ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious” (3.2.89-92) makes the crowd to rethink about whether Caesar was actually ambitious. Furthermore, after the line above, then Antony says, “And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.93). Antony keeps mentioning that Brutus is an honorable man after questioning what Brutus said about Caesar being ambitious is right or wrong. By doing this so, it makes the crowd to rethink and doubt about Brutus’ speech. This tactic makes the public to lose their credibility towards Brutus and gain towards Antony. Antony making his perspective neutral shows how honest and credible he
The difference between the speeches that Brutus and Antony gave is that Brutus appeals to reason and logic, while Antony appeals to emotions. Brutus explains his reasons for killing Caesar. Brutus was very honorable in the way that he always told people the truth. This is particularly obvious in the balanced sentences he uses in his opening remarks. "Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent that you may hear. Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge. If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his. If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. "(The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act 3, scene 2, page 2)
However, Antony’s small amount of logos is just as strong, if not stronger than Brutus’s excessive amount. While in the first of calming the crowd, Brutus inquires, “Would you rather Caesar live and die all slaves, / than that Caesar were dead and die all free men?” (JC 3.2.23-24). This is a botched logic; he does not ever present actual evidence of this tyrannical behavior in Caesar or his actions. However, in the minds of the king-fearing Romans, the words, flimsy though they are, are enough. In disproving Brutus’s claims that Caesar was ambitious, Antony uses many examples to prove the opposite. The following brings the welfare of the people into it, showing that with Caesar alive they were given much: “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / whose ransoms did the general coffers fill; / did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (JC 3.2.89-91). Antony provides solid evidence and a sound argument to explain that Caesar’s seemingly ambitious actions were rather to help the people of Rome, which is not ambitious in the
Both men come from different backgrounds, and they both have different ambitions-different motivations. Only two important things tie them together with the thread of similarity. One is Julius Caesar while the other is the people of Rome. The people look up to both Brutus and Antony, and they trust them, as people can see in two different quotes from Act III, Scene two. “The noble Brutus is ascended: silence! (Act III, Scene 2- line 1544)” A third citizen shouts from the crowd, and in the same scene a same third citizen states, “there’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony.(Act III, Scene 2- line 1661)” These quotes show that both Brutus and Antony were trusted by the public, seen as noble, and because of that, they both have two different speeches that led to two different
Antony asks rhetorical questions and lets the audience answer for themselves. Brutus uses ethos by stating that he a noble man and that is why the people should believe him but infact Antony questions his nobility by saying what Brutus said,” Brutus is an honourable man”(III.ii.79). In a way, Antony states what Brutus states to convince the audience by using examples that Brutus is wrong. Antony himself knows what kind of man Brutus is but lets the people figure it out on their own. In addition, Brutus uses logos by expressing that fact that Caesar died because of his ambition. This argument is severely under supported because his reasons are invalid and simply observations. Antony uses “did this in Caesar seem ambitious” to question Brutus’ argument (III.ii.82). Antony gives examples backing his argument like when Caesar refused the crown thrice to prove his humbleness. The way Antony convinces the people to rebel is by using pathos. He brings the audience in by stepping down to their level and showing them the body of Caesar. While Antony talks at Caesar's funeral, he pauses because” heart us in the coffin there with Caesar “(III.ii.98). When Antony becomes emotional, he reminds the audience about what injust event happened to the much loved
Brutus appeals to the audience's rationality, whereas Antony shows feelings toward their emotions. Brutus' rhetorical devices are sound but easy. He uses parallel structure to show you his point - "as he was valiant, I honor him; as he was ambitious, I slew him." He models himself as Caesar's best friend, believing that will help them see that the honor of the murder is divorced from emotional feelings. Antony, on the other hand, lays the irony on thick. He stipulates Brutus's honor, but then repeats the phrase "Brutus is an honorable man" rhythmically to stress that the opposite is in fact true. Lastly, Antony takes a dramatic pause to supposedly collect himself, though all is does is enflame the crowd. Lastly, Antony uses a document to
In the play “Julius Caesar”, both Mark Antony and Brutus give compelling and effective arguments after the murder of Julius Caesar. They include similar points in their speeches, but the way they present is very different. Although both give strong performances, Mark Antony’s delivery and content of his speech is more effective than the speech Brutus presents.
Brutus thinks that he can become ruler of Rome but Antony doesn’t think he is wise enough to become the ruler. Brutus says in his speech, "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe." Brutus is trying to win the people of Rome over by saying he is honorable. In Antony's speech, he said, "Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears." Antony is making himself seem really smart and getting their attention so that all they will do is truly believe him and pay very close attention. Antony also says, "And sure he is an honorable man. I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke." By saying that, it proves right there that he was talking bad about Brutus.
Both, Brutus and Antony, used ethos, logos, and pathos in their speeches in an effort to get the people of Rome to side with them in the war that was just beginning. They both were able to use theses three modes of persuasion in different ways that benefited them. Brutus pulled more towards logic and reason and Antony pulled more towards