Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between British and American English
Differences between England and America
Literary analysis girl
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between British and American English
Salvation. Pg. 352
Hughes is showing an example for treating a serious subject with sensitivity and resentment. You basically know that they were going to just get up. In paragraph 6, sentence 5, 6 and 7, he says I’m tired of sitting here. Let’s get up and be saved. So he got up and was saved. Basically he’s being bitter to the belief of Jesus coming to you and being saved.
Hughes makes it slightly obvious that this is mostly a common, working class, black Christian church. Paragraph 4 he described old women with jet black faces and braided hair; old men with work gnarled hands. As Langston was waiting to see Jesus these church people were getting sad and nervous. Because everyone should be saved and see the light. To me Hughes is saying it’s sad that most people claim the light for purposes that it’s just supposed to happen. He’s also saying adults pressure children to believe or think a certain way, when there not ready.
38 who saw murder didn’t call the police. Pg. 679
Gansberg to me was showing how distant people were from one another. He’s saying we should do more for each other; protect each other better. He gives deed back to show his opinion clearly. In paragraph 24 a police stressed how simple it would have been to get in touch with them. “a phone call” said one of the detectives “would have don’t it.” He shows how many of them just didn’t want to get “involved.”
This essay kind of shocked me, but then half of me sees how accurate it is. It shocked me! You would think since its really easy, people would call the police. The other part of me sees how your mind can make it seem scary. Most people may think something may happen to them. It seems shellfish but what if there was a strong change of getting hurt, then what woul...
... middle of paper ...
...tside without running into a swarm of kids. Basically, you need to know that it's getting crowded. England doesn't want to deal with the mess in Ireland, but the situation is getting dire. Priority number one is saving as much money as possible. No one knows what to do with the gaggle of kids. They're draining resources and becoming a major annoyance. In Paragraph 10, the author finally gets around to proposing a solution. It's simple: kids are tasty and cost a lot when they hit the terrible twos. If you fatten them up and sell them for shillings, the famine and overpopulation crisis will be averted. He’s dehumanizing people. He makes infants seem insignificant, he even says some baby meat is the best. They basically are fed up! Trying to tax them when they have nothing, take the kids. It’s weird to me I didn’t really enjoy this very much, but found it interesting.
Then we can find the solution. He then suggests a solution and then lists a whole list of advantages. The. His proposal to eat the Irish babies is followed by advantages such as "by the sale of their children, [the parents would] be rid of the charge of maintaining them after the first year." To a poverty stricken person this would take a huge load off of their shoulders by not having to raise a child, while at the same time.
1) Jonathan Edwards delivered this sermon during the first Great Awakening, a time of religious revival in Europe and America. During the Great Awakening, Christianity shifted its focus from ceremonies and rituals, and began to realign itself with introspection to foster a deep sense of morality and redemption. Edwards was a key preacher and minister that delivered many sermons preaching about revival and reformed theology. 2) Edwards sermon was directed towards non believers and those who have turned away from the light of God, and in his words “sinners.”
If an individual is familiar with their surrounding “they are more likely to help” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print). In the essay, the authors state “the scene of the crime, the streets, in middle class society “represents all the vulgar and perilous in life” (Milgram, Stanley, and Paul Hollander. Paralyzed Witnesses: The Murder They Heard. Print.). In society, the streets, especially at night, represents the dangerous and negative sides of society due to the crimes and chaos that occur on the streets (gangs, drive-by shootings, robberies, murders, large crowds walking, etc.). The crimes and dangers of the streets cause many people to fear being on the streets alone which leads to external conflicts. When the murder was occurring, the witnesses’ attitudes of the streets prevented them from calling the police due to the fear of the streets and since the witnesses were middle-class, they believed that Genovese was poor, a criminal, or someone who has nothing else to do and was expecting for the=is to eventually
For a moment, imagine being in young Hughes’ place, and hearing, “Langston, why don’t you come? Why don’t you come and be saved? Oh, lamb of God! Why don’t you come?” (Hughes, 112), being whispered into your ear by your aunt as tears rush down her face. Would you not take the easy way out? How could someone at the age of twelve understand the torment that follows such an event? Hughes learned that night just what he had done, and what it meant, as he mentions in his essay when he says, “That night, for the last time but one- for I was a big boy twelve years old- I cried. I cried, in bed alone, and couldn’t stop. I buried my head under the quilts, but my aunt heard me….I was really crying because I couldn’t bear to tell her that I had lied, that I had deceived everybody in the church, and that I hadn’t seen Jesus, and that now I didn’t believe there was a Jesus anymore, since he didn’t come to help me” (Hughes, 112). At the first moment he was alone in silence, he understood what he had learned, and what it meant. That not only did he lie to his aunt, and to the church, but in his time of need, no one was there to help. There was no God by his side as he knelt on the church
Langston Hughes was twelve when he was “saved.” He was at a revival at his Aunts church when he soon felted pressured to accept Jesus into his heart. He wanted to experience what everyone else was feeling but could not experience what others were. Soon he began thinking of what the other guy was feeling and began to become ashamed of himself, holding everything in for so long. Then Westley was sitting high on the thrown with Christ and Langston wanted that. Soon after Langston’s stood up to be saved, everyone started cheering and celebrating his salvation with him. Whenever he got home from the revival he cried alone in his room. His aunt thought he was crying because the Holy Spirit came into his life. Little did she know he was crying because he lied and said that he seen Jesus when he really didn’t (McMahan, Day, Funk, and Coleman 280).
The people at the church believed in Jesus because that was how they were raised, and that is how it was. This is why Langston Hughes wanted to see Jesus because he wanted to have a better understanding of his faith and be saved. Being told to worship and honor Jesus blindly, raised many questions in his mind and before his relationship could grow with Jesus he needed them answered. So he figured that if Jesus came like the church promised Jesus would, he would be enlightened and would honor and worship him. So Langston waited and waited, but Jesus never came.
In a Modest Proposal, the main issue is the proposal and why it was proposed; why not eat and sell babies since you're all so hungry and poor? In a poor, cold, dirty, desperate Ireland in 1729, any hope the Irish can get will be of assistance. Jonathan Swift is presenting the idea to the highest class and the king of Ireland that if they don't step into assist, it's almost like the poor are going to get so needy, and they’ll have to sell their own children to stay alive. Swift takes it step-by-step, how the poor will cook the babies, sell them, how old they should be, how many should be sold, and other exotic details. The author absolutely assumes that there is a huge problem in Ireland: the Irish need help. The problem is overpopulati...
It was the night of the big revival, and Langston, a young boy going on the age of thirteen, was brought to his Aunt Reed’s church to see Jesus and be saved from sin. His aunt told him, “when you were saved from sin you saw a light, and something happened to you inside” (219). He believed her. When he was brought to church, his aunt directed him to the front row, where he sat calmly and patiently in the heat, waiting for the preacher to begin the service. The Preacher welcomed the “young lambs” (219) and started his sermon. Towards the end of his speech he invited the young children to the altar to be saved. At this point, Langston was confused because he was not seeing Jesus before him. All the young boys and girls sprang to their feet except Langston and another boy named Westley. They were the only two left on, what the parishioners of the church called, the “mourners’ bench” (218). Finally, Westley became very restless and decided that he was not going to sit on this bench anymore. Langston was left there all alone until
Jonathan Smith goes to extreme measures to explain his new plan to raise the economic wellbeing of his country. He explains what age is too young and what age is too old, in order to eat the tenants children when they are at their prime juiciness. He also gives a list of suggestions on how to cook them, ?A young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled, and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout.? All of this talk about eating children comes as a surprise because previous to this disturbing suggestion, Swift is ironically discussing the plight of starving beggars in Ireland. The reader is unprepared for the solution that he suggests.
Salvation is commonly used as another word for redemption, and saved from your sin in many religions. The theme of this story is that the author, Langston Hughes, lost his faith in Christianity. He chose narration to explain the theme of the story because it will make more sense to be in his shoes to tell an experience than to speak on someone else’s behalf. This story was also written to show the pressure adult put on children that is not aware of exactly what’s going on in a church or a way to show that not everyone beliefs are the
The essay, A Modest Proposal, is a proposal to end the economic dilemma in Ireland by selling the poor’s children, at the age of one, for food. The narrator states, “I think it is agreed by all parties that this prodigious number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels of their mothers, and frequently of their father, is in the present deplorable state of the kingdom a very great additional grievance” (Swift). According to this proposal, by selling the children for food to the wealthy in Ireland many problems will be resolved. The poor mothers will earn money to live on and will not have to raise children, the wealthy will have a new meat source and “an increase in his own popularity among his tenants” (Sparknotes), and the economy will improve because of all of the market action. In the narrator’s eyes, this proposal equals an all around win for the people of Ireland and he cannot see any objection to his plan.
In “A Modest Proposal,” Jonathan Swift writes of the poor men, women, and children of Dublin, Ireland crowding the streets due to the years of drought and crop failure. He estimates that 120,000 children are born each year and asks the question of how these people are to be provided for. Then he tells of his proposal. He states that 20,000 of the 120,000 may be reserved for breeding purposes, while the other 100,000 be sold to dine on. Swift offers several advantages to his proposal some being: the poor tenants will have something of value in their home, the wealth of the nation will greatly increase as well as the cost of caring for the child will be eliminated after a year, and eliminating the food shortages the nation is undergoing. The only counter argument he offers is that killing and eating those infants will decrease the population so much that it will make it easier for England to concur them. He finishes his proposal with a statement that he himself is not interested in making a profit since his own children are past the right age and his wife not being able to have any more children.
Swift explains how selling a marketable child will be profitable and why the people of Dublin are willing butcher children to survive. He does this by saying, “I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs” (585). Swift uses verbal irony in a powerful way to state that Irish people should not be treated like animals killed as food. Swift points out the famine and the terrible living conditions that are threatening the Irish population by stating that children are a good source of food just like real animals do.... ... middle of paper ...
1) but was mislead to believe he would be. He enticed the audience's attention to provoke an inquiry into the nature of his preservation. It is vital to comprehend that at the certain age of twelve and thirteen the adolescents are finding their place in their congregation; it becomes difficult for some to surrender to the pressure of the congregation. The “lambs” ( Hughes para. 3 ) were to be strengthen into the inclusion of the elder’s society, thus they would be accepting of their church and faith. Despite the fact Hughes needed physical credibility to believe in Jesus, he wanted to believe his aunt regarding his newcome salvation. He realized that in reality he was not saved, rather he was corrupted by the pressure from the congregation leading to the loss of
...ion. Saying even though Irish people are the enemy, it's best to have a few of them to help advance the economy and the countryside. This is also ironic because the writer doesn’t even accept that the concept of eating one-year olds is morally wrong.