Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freedom of speech constitution important
The 7 principles of constitution
The american political system checks and balances
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freedom of speech constitution important
The foundational American ideas that Zinn discuss in the article are the limits of the government, the checks and balances in the three branches of the government, it also talks about how the Supreme Courts is the branch of the government that interprets the law. Probably one of the main ideas that the founding fathers had when they wrote The Constitution was to limit the power of the government. The colonies were being being oppresses by a king so when they wrote the Constitution it was important to limit the power of the government. Zinn also mention how the judges of the Supreme Court are the ones in charge of interpreting the Constitution. However, he does believe that The Constitution alone is not going to protect the rights of the American …show more content…
He mentions that racial equality did not happened only because the Thirteenth, Fourteen, and Fifteenth Amendments; he believed that without the Civil Rights Movements nothings would had happened even when the Constitution said so. In addition, he thinks that one-way people can protect their freedom of speech is by being courageous and saying what they think and then defending their right of freedom of speech. He mentions about the lack of rights when it comes to economic justice in the Constitution. Like he mentions, people would not have rights like minimum wage, and other economics-related right without asking for them. His conclusion is that if people do not voice their request the constitution by itself is not going to give people their …show more content…
I believe we can use the Constitution as a guide-line of our government. I agree with Zinn that without people wanting changes, we would not have the rights and liberties that we have right now; however, I think the Constitution made those changes to be much easier to achieved. The Constitution is such an “open” document that even if it was written centuries ago, we can still go back to it today seek for answer for question the rights we have about same sex married, gun control, the right to privacy that we have with our electronics devices and social media, healthcare and many other areas that back then were unthinkable. I think he is right because as society changes and new generations are born their ideas and belief also change. If we were to depend on the beliefs they had when they wrote the Constitution, woman would not be able to vote, abortion would be illegal, we would probably still have slavery, and many other things that in today society are unacceptable because we wanted those
He mention the reason why people would claim why it is not a good to mange racist speech. The argument is that the freedom of speech is a stimulus in our democratic setup. Also another claim is that people suffer hate speech but it is necessary for the convenience of the society as a whole. To add it is essential to minorities because it's their only source of getting people to feel bad for them. Regulating racist speech would be impossible it would surge an imbalance between the continued free ideas and the parliamentary process dependent and on the other the need for the further cause of
For example, she talks about how blacks aren't allowed to go to certain places. The reason being is the white's discriminate the black people for the fact that the color is different. The white people use this as an excuse to limit the black people's freedom. In the article it states, “certain provisions of the Declaration are stated in such broad terms as to be acceptable only because the provisions and article 30 providing for limitation on the exercise of the rights for the purpose of meeting the requirement of morality, public order, and the general welfare.” This means that everyone has the right to equal access to the public service in this country. On the other hand, it clearly states that everyone has their rights, but in reality the white community is limiting the black people's rights. Which I believe isn't fair because either everyone gets their rights or no one gets their
In this paper we will discuss the different point of views on the revolutionary war period that lead up the creation of the constitution between Howard Zinn and Larry Schweikart. It is true that the constitution as created by the rich, however the rich were more educated than the poor at the time, making them the reliable leaders of the society. This said, the rich might have tweaked the Laws to their slight advantage. Schweikart explains the creation of the constitution in order to fulfil the needs of the population. However Zinn emphasizes the fact that the government is controlled by the elites who benefit the most form the foundation of the constitution.
After the American Revolution, America had earned it’s freedom from Britain. In order to govern this new country the Articles of Confederation was created. This document was flawed by the colonists fear of putting too much power into a central government. Knowing the document needed to be fixed a constitutional convention was called. The document created at this convention has been our constitution ever since. But even the Constitution was meet with criticism. One major concern when writing the constitution was how to protect the citizens rights. The Constitution did this through the preamble, the legislative process, the limit of presidential terms, the judicial branch, and the bill of rights.
by saying what it has become today in the way of its development. It is not
He talks about how the emancipation is very important to us African Americans, but to other white people it was just a speech because it did not really involve them, so they really just did not care because it was not their history. As Americans, I feel we share the same history because it was just not the blacks that got everything passed for them, but it was also the whites because we all played a separate part with it. When issues like this come up I just look back on the elections of my president Obama. Every one said that us as African Americans we got him into office both times, but if the whole black population would of voted just for Obama he would not have won.... ...
...servation. His most important points were as follows: education taught the Negro to feel inferior, it has not prepared Negroes to make an adequate living in his community and mis-educated the Negroes are hindering racial development rather than aiding it.
Through the years many changes have taken place, and technologies have been discovered, yet our Constitution remains. Some say that the Constitution was written for people hundreds of years ago, and in turn is out of step with the times. Yet its principals and guidelines have held thus far. The framers would be pleases that their great planning and thought have been implemented up until this point. However this does not compensate for the fact, that the we the people have empowered the government more so than our fore fathers had intended. Citizens were entrusted with the duty to oversee the government, yet so many times they are disinterested and only seem to have an opinion when the government’s implications affect them. As time has changed so has the American people, we often interpret our freedoms in a self serving manner, disregarding the good of the whole and also the good for the future. Thus there are no true flaws in the Constitution, it appears that the conflict emerges in the individual and their self, and poses question when we must decide when to compromise the morals that our Constitution was founded on, or when to stick to what we know is right and honest.
He states that “Old truths have been relearned; untruths have been unlearned.” What he means is that the old ways that were correct must come back into the law and the lies that are in the law must be removed. He constantly uses the phrase “I see” to make statements. One of his statements is about the poverty in the United States. He
Despite this argument and many arguments are subject to speculation in the end, due to the inability to actually get the perspective of the founding fathers we can still see through the evidence that Zinn’s Quote does hold some truths to it. Though he does get some things rights, his statement holds fallacy in it's inability to quantify the magnitude to which the founding fathers chose to benefit themselves through a new government. “Before the throne of the Almighty, man will be judged not by his acts but by his intentions. For God alone reads our hearts.”()
The idea of freedom, that America, founded its principles on, has not always successfully held up. Undoubtedly when our country first started, we had the idea in mind, that our constitution would protect the needs of its people, even as those needs alter; therefore it’s wording needed to be, ductile and interpretive. In recent years, this plasticity has become functional and fair, yet in the past, politicians used it to give and revoke, power, to and from people. Prior to the civil war, though it helped spark many of the social/civil revolution we know today, liberty and freedom were a luxury enjoyed by a few people. Woman, non-whites, and low-income people had their liberties denied, questioned or altogether abolished. However these same groups
In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.
“The Constitution leaves in its wake a long legacy, forever shaping the fate of many other countries. Whether those countries are currently in a state favorable to liberty or not, it is undeniable that the U.S. Constitution’s principles have caused people to rethink how to organize their political systems” (Hang). Time has only added value to the Constitution, for every time we reference it in our lives it is a testament of our trust and loyalty in what it states about our rights as individuals and the role the government plays in our lives. When it was written, the Constitution was the law of the land that gave people rights they had previously lived without. Similarly, we live lives of choice and independence because of the same document while other countries limit all the rights we are guaranteed in the Constitution. Simply put, “The Constitution is important because it protects individual freedom, and its fundamental principles govern the United States. The Constitution places the government 's power in the hands of the citizens. It limits the power of the government and establishes a system of checks and balances”
The beginning of the Constitution provides a basis for one to question the righteousness of the Framers intentions. The Constitution starts by saying, “ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This was not a true statement. That phrase excluded black people, women, and men who lacked wealth. Government under the British did the same thing; all the power was made accessible to only the rich. The American Revolution was aimed at acquiring equal and fair representation in government for everyone. Next, the Constitution established a Supreme Court. The Supreme Court was a group of selected people who would make major legal decisions for the country. These people were not elected or chosen by the people, they were chosen by the government. This placed a form of power over the people of the United States that had been held by King George. The Supreme Court had the power to ma...
The men who wrote the American constitution agreed with Thomas Hobbes that humans were naturally evil. Therefore, they agreed that in order to prevent a dictatorship or monarchy, the citizens should have influence in the government. The writers wanted a more ideal constitution, but they realized evil human motives would never change. One of the main goals of the constitution was to create a balanced government that would allow the citizens to prevent each other from being corrupt. The writers wanted to give citizens liberty, but they did not want to give people so much liberty that they would have an uncontrollable amount of power. The writers agreed that a citizen’s influence in government would be proportionate to that individual’s property.