John Updike A & P Literary Analysis

1171 Words3 Pages

A&P by John Updike is a short story from the account of a 19-year-old checkout boy at the local supermarket. Through their different perspectives, M. Porter, Lawrence Dessner, and Corey Thompson provide seperate interpretations of John Updike’s short story, with three different articles reveal contrasting understandings of literature and interpretation. Porter understands the short story as a narration of Emersonian freedom from the Establishment, and nonconformity to the loss of individuality, Dessner as an ironic underrating of adult life and Thompson as a release from the grips of inevitable future adult oppression. Porter analyzes the short story to be a narration of nonconformist ideals which cause the main character Sammy to take an …show more content…

In Porter’s eyes, setting himself against the majority is to break away from the bondage of a society that is destined to repeat the same old monotonous activities day after day. The nonconformist stance that Porter arrives at is also due in part to Sammy’s “rigid standards for quality” (Porter 1156). In the short story, Sammy mercilessly attacks the shoppers of the A&P and the townies of his New England community because he is “repulsed by their insensitivity, their loss of individuality, and by the joyless, wooden nature of their existence” (Porter 1156). In the short story, readers examine multiple occasions of Sammy as he disdainfully describes the store itself as well as its shoppers who he calls “sheep pushing their carts” or as “scared pigs in chutes”, these references lead one to the conclusion that the patrons flock in groups and do not seperate. “I bet you could set off dynamite in an …show more content…

Thompson does not believe that the objectification of the girls is what made Sammy quit his job, he thinks that Sammy has wanted to quit his job because he has been working at the store for too long and because he can no longer handle the customers. Thompson believes that Sammy has been thinking of quitting his job for a while because everything is so well planned right down to the time of year that would be best to leave. Sammy narrates “One advantage to this scene taking place in summer, I can follow this up with a clean exit, there's no fumbling around getting your coat and galoshes” which Thompson says leads readers to the conclusion that this is not a spur of the moment thought. Because Sammy has been thinking of quitting for so long, the girls simply are pawns in completing his mission, Thompson says “through masking his actions as chivalry Sammy uses the girls; for they act as catalysts that precipitate his well-considered decision to resign”. Instead of thinking that Sammy is a man of courage or defending his girls, “Sammy should not be regarded as a hero, but rather as a young man who takes full advantage of an opportunity to free himself from the responsibility – filled life that he desperately wants to avoid (Thompson

Open Document