John Locke's Theory Of Personal Identity

815 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Locke’s theory of personal identity

This paper will argue that the philosopher John Locke would have agreed that the human being Karla Faye Tucker should have been executed. I will start by examining the fundamental difference between a human being and a person as forwarded by Locke. In addition, this paper will address what identity over time or what it means to be the same person over a period of time is. I will then show that through Locke's personal opinions, he would have believed that the human being Karla Faye Tucker was the same person who committed the crime 14 years ago and is thus culpable for punishment. A strong objection to my argument however is of Hume's opinion or lack of opinion (account or lack of account) on personal identity. Hume argues that the concept of personal identity is a falsification and that our personal identity is nothing more than a collection of memories which we bundle together as memories. I will counter-argue however that " ". From Locke's point of view, a person is a "thinking intelligent being that has reason and reflection and can consider itself as itself...in different times and places...{through} only consciousness which is inseparable from thinking" and can only be considered the same person over time if he or she retains their memories. For Locke, it is the capacity to reason, understand, and browse through our memories and thoughts that makes a individual a full fledged person rather than being just a human being or dog or dolphin or any other non-human animal. This presents major implications on the concept of what identity over time is. Locke believed that when it came to this topic, our corporeal self was insignificant as living things cannot just depend on the sameness of particles to be considered to have th... ... middle of paper ... ... would not match the impression of Karla Faye Tucker in 1985 having condemned her previous life and being reborn as a born again Christian. Although Hume makes many points, there are a lot of flaws I find in his argument. To begin, if we accept that the mind is nothing but a bundle of sensations and memories, then it is possible that each strand of the bundle could have the capacity to function on their own and therefore act and exist independently. In addition, we designate certain sensations to the respective bundles they belong to and such shows a dependency of sensations on our minds that is in contrast to the prerequisites of the bundle theory. Ayer states that "if perceptions can exist only as members of the minds to which they belong, then it would seem that any account of the mind in terms of relations between perceptions would be viciously circular". This

Show More
Related

  • The Memory Theory Of John Locke And Locke's Personal Identity

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke believes that A is identical with B, if and only if, A remembers the thoughts, feelings, and actions had or done by B from a first-person point of view. This shows that the important feature, memory, is linking a person from the beginning of their life to the end of their life. Locke’s memory theory would look something like this: The self changes over time, so it may seem like personal identity changes too. However, even if you are changing, you are still retaining past memories. Therefore, if you can retain memories, memories are the link between you and an earlier you, so personal identity persists over time. So, memory is the necessary and sufficient condition of personal

    Read More

  • What Does John Locke's Theory Of Being Born As A Blank Slate?

    1594 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Shelley explores John Locke's theory of being born as a blank slate by introducing a character who is born with a blank slate. When the creature is brought to life, the creature is immediately called a “wretch” (Shelley 68) and is left alone to fend for himself. The creature is like a child with no parents without any idea what to do. In John Locke’s blank slate theory or, tabulae rasa, knowledge and moral sense arise solely from experience. He therefore placed enormous importance on the development of education. John Locke promoted the role of sensory awareness and experiences in the formation of human notion. This theory shows that the simple things, such as colors and shapes, are gathered passively, while more complex thoughts, such as the relationship between cause and effect and individual identities, are actively assembled. (World History in Context) “Most critics agree that Locke strongly influenced Shelley's characterization of the creature. She wanted her readers to understand how important the creature's social conditioning is to his development as a conscious being.” (Gale Reference Library) Jean Jacque Rousseau created the social contact theory, which is quite similar to John Locke’s theory. In the social contract theory, people’s moral or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. He is enormously influenced by John Locke, which has made the theory of being born with a “blank slate” (Gale Reference Library) one of the most well-known theories. Like John Locke, Jean Jacque Rousseau also believed in the fact that humans are born with a blank slate and learn from their experiences. Mary Shelley was inspired by Rouss...

    Read More

  • Locke And Machiavelli Research Paper

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke’s viewpoint towards human nature is more optimistic and positive as it highlights the individual as he views humans as being rational and with reason. He believes that humans are bound by natural laws that keep each other from harming one another. Thus, no human is better or higher in status than another and are equal thus attaining perfect freedom as all men are created equally. Humans are by nature born free as Locke states that “man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom” and also with “an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature, equally with any other man” has the power to preserve his “property, life, liberty and estate” (Locke, Section 87). Locke believes in the state of nature that “has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions” (Lock...

    Read More

  • Plato And Lucretius: Life After Death

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    He argued that personal identity goes hand in hand with the consciousness of someone. So if you switched bodies, you would still view your new body as “yourself” because your mind and consciousness is with it. Thomas Reid attempted to falsify Locke’s proposition by creating the “Brave Young Officer” situation. This objection is a story about a military officer. When the 40-year old officer goes to steal food, he remembers himself stealing an apple from his neighbors as a 10-year old child. Then, at 80-years old, the now general remembers stealing food as a 40-year old officer, but not as a 10-year old child. Locke would say that the general is both the same and not the same as the child. This is because the officer shares continuity of consciousness with the child and the general, so both the general and the child must be related. But also according to Locke, if something doesn’t share a continuous stream of memory, then they are not related. So the general and the child can’t be the same person if they don’t share continuity of consciousness. Reid argues: how could you be the same but not the same? How can continuity of memory or consciousness dictate personal identity if we forget our memories? Joseph Butler declared that John Locke’s theory was circular because the notion of memory it employs presupposes the notion of personal identity. Both critics favor a substance-view of personal

    Read More

  • Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    For individual property to exist, there must be a means for individuals to appropriate the things around them. Locke starts out with the idea of the property of person; each person owns his or her own body, and all the labor that they perform with the body. When an individual adds their own labor, their own property, to a foreign object or good, that object becomes their own because they have added their labor. This appropriation of goods does not demand the consent of humankind in general, each person has license to appropriate things in this way by individual initiative.

    Read More

  • The Memory Theory: The Problem Of Personal Identity

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophers have been pondering over the problem of personal identity for centuries and today we still have not completely figured it out. The body and soul theories clearly failed to answer that, so philosopher John Locke attempted to answer the question with his new theory, the memory theory. The memory theory states that an identical persons are equal to one another if they share at least one memory experience. This means that a present person that his past self are only identical person’s if they can both recall one memory. For example, Johnny at age 30 and Johnny at age 12 both remember their big birthday party when they were seven, so they are considered to be the same person. As stated in the claim, it only applies to memory experiences,

    Read More

  • John Locke on Personal Identity

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order to form an opinion on what Locke would do in the case of the 80 year old man who has been charged with war crimes that he genuinely does not remember one has to analyse the complex definitions surrounding identities. This essay will look into Locke’s thoughts and theories and by process of elimination speculate on how Locke would have evaluated the claim. Why the necessity to fully analyse the definition of identity? Locke believed that the identity of things was not always as readily discernable as what first meets the eye and as a consequence set about defining the identity of all things from physical objects, the identity of living entities and ultimately the identity of man and the identity of person.

    Read More

  • John Perry's Dialogue On Personal Identity And Imorality?

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    In John Perry’s “dialogue on personal identity and immorality”, Dave Cohen and Sam Miller visit Gretchen Weirob in the hospital because of Weirob’s injury in a motorcycle accident, they raise a discussion on personal identity. Cohen later takes up issues raised in the case where Julia’s brain is taken from her deteriorated body and placed on the healthy body of Mary whose brain has been destroyed. Therefore Mary has her own body with Julia’s memory and personality. The case proposes an argument

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Jeremy Bentham's 'Anarchical Fallacies'

    2138 Words  | 5 Pages

    Locke believes that everyone is born as a blank slate. According to Locke there is no innate human nature but human nature is something we create. And because we are born as an equal blank slate all men have the opportunity to create human nature therefore Locke believed all men are created equal. Unlike Bentham Locke believed that government needed to take a step back and allow for each individual to have the right to three things: life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The Governments role should not be in dictating people what to do but to allow individuals to their three

    Read More

  • Derek Parfit's Bundle Theory

    601 Words  | 2 Pages

    David Hume was a philosopher who was interest in person identities and created the Bundle Theory. The Bundle Theory is an ontological theory about objects in which it consists of a bundle of properties, relations, or expressions. The object consists of its properties and nothing more than that, which means that there cannot be an object without its properties and no one can even think or imagine such an object. Every person is just a series of different events, states, sensations, and thoughts. We often question ourselves without identity with questions such as who are we? What makes who we are over time? Or what makes us the same person that we were since birth? Derek Parfit was another philosopher who was very interest in personal identity,

    Read More

  • John Locke on Personal Identity

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    Locke believed that the identity of a person has the sameness of the consciousness: “What makes a man be himself to himself is sameness of consciousness, so personal identity depends entirely on that—whether the consciousness is tied to one substance throughout or rather is continued in a series of different su...

    Read More

  • David Hume’s Treatment of Mind

    3820 Words  | 8 Pages

    It is well known that David Hume rejected any idea of a 'substance of the mind' that would account for, among other things, personal identity. I will attempt to show that Hume's argument against the existence of substantival mind presupposes that such an entity actually ...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume uses senses, like Descartes, to find the truth in life. By using the senses he states that all contents of the mind come from experience. This leads to the mind having an unbound potential since all the contents are lead by experiences. The mind is made up two parts impressions and ideas. Impressions are the immediate data of the experience. For example, when someone drops a book on the desk and you hear a loud sound. The sight of the book dropping and hitting the desk is registered by an individual’s senses- sight, sound, feeling. Hume believes there are two types of impressions, original and secondary impressions. Original impressions are based on the senses,

    Read More

  • John Locke's Theory Of Ethical Egoism

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Based on the "Right Theory" of John Locke, the 17th century British philosopher, He argued that "laws of nature mandate that we should not harm anyone's life, health , liberty or possessions." Food is considered as a possession by other person so if you steal, you can be a violator to "the laws of nature." Therefore, based on Locke's theory stealing can viewed as immoral or unethical. In addition, he said that every person has "the rights and duties" to each other. Meaning, you have the right to acquire possessions including the your basic needs such as food. And other people, on other hand have also a moral duty not to rob you.

    Read More

  • John Locke Reflection Paper

    1399 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke stated that the identity of persons was the identity of conscious. What Locke meant by this is even if our body changes our mind doesn’t such as our memory’s. So for example, many people have horror accidents where they lose their arms, fingers or even legs, but either way the memory stays the same therefore they are the same person. Locke focused a lot on memory, he thought that our memory’s made us who we are and if we were to switch brains with someone and our memory were now in their body of another person 's. That the person who held the memory is now the same person they were before they switched bodies. So for example, if I was to break my mother’s favorite vase, then decide I wanted to switch bodies with my brother, but I

    Read More

More about John Locke's Theory Of Personal Identity

Open Document