John Grim And Mary Evelyn Tucker's Ecology And Environment

717 Words2 Pages

In Ecology and Religion, John Grim and Mary Evelyn Tucker present a thorough overview of their studies on religious ecology and environment. They devoted themselves in field of religion and ecology, and committed to advocate the importance of including religious worldviews as a component of solving environment crisis that human beings are facing now.
With their rich experiences in academic research and corporation with multiple professionals, they are showing the development of various traditions over time in different geographic contexts, and how it will affect the relationship between human and the nature. Despite the rapid change due to modernization and industrialization, religious traditions still rooted into human’s daily life in various forms, such as Taichi in Daoism and Confucianism. Through …show more content…

Religious symbols have no definite definition as they are interpreted and reinterpreted over time and place. Not knowing and understanding religious symbols could be the cause the worse exploitation of nature, “Devaluation of nature has been driven in large measure by an economism that reduce symbolic knowing to the marketplaces of materialism. Thus, nature is seen as primarily for human use and exploitation”(34). A better understanding of how the nature and ecology work allowing human to recognize the symbolic and biological interdependence between the two. For example, each bioculture symbol (air, earth, water, and fire) has unique meaning, such as orienting, grounding, nurturing and transforming respectively. The combination of these four symbols is the foundation of religious ecology, “Ways of orienting and grounding whereby humans, acknowledging the limitations of phenomenal reality and the suffering inherent in life, undertake specific practices of nurturing and transforming self and community in a particular cosmological context that regards nature as inherently valuable”

Open Document