The Importance Of World Peace

1126 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Warfare before and after industrialization

At the American University in 1963, John F. Kennedy summed up world peace as being: based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institutions - on a series of concrete actions and effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There is no single, simple key to this peace, no grand or magic formula to be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static, changing to meet the challenge of each new generation (Kennedy 1963). Our world holds nations that are constantly at war each other or that participate in global conflicts. There seems to be no end to the chaos. So with the present state of things, it is hard to see a future that contains world peace. However, I would …show more content…

War, crime, international and state conflicts are nonstop on the news every day. Through my life, and most of history, there has been constant war or conflict. With this, it is hard to see a time when perpetual peace will be obtained. It is easy to feel hopeless or defeated when looking at the world from only the view of skepticism. However, when you look at peace as being in the terms of Kant’s ideals, it easier to perceive as a logical reality. I think that Kant has provided some adequate guidelines which are working towards world peace. What he has demonstrated, is pretty much being enacted in our current times. Modern governments are being based less on authority and more on its citizens’ rights. And where this is not true, nations and people are working towards making it a reality. Also, a league of nations is in place. The United Nations may still be in a state of growth, and has not reached full potential, but it is working towards a common good. Through these actions and objectives, I believe that perpetual peace may be an objective end, which will be eventually

Show More
Related

  • A critical analysis of the Counterculture Movement through film

    1759 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ychedelics no longer shed light on the possibility of peace but instead the insanity of a social world.

    Read More

  • The United States Illogical Practice of Democratic Peace Theory in the Middle East

    2255 Words  | 5 Pages

    The idea of a lasting, ideally global, peace has been present in the minds of people for centuries. The most notable formulation of this is Kant’s vision of perpetual peace. “He saw it as a condition that needed to be maintained by politics between states with governments which represented society and separation of power. From this basic framework stems the idea called “democratic peace theory” (pg. 82). Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) asserts that democracies do not generally fight other democracies because they share common norms and domestic institutions that constrain international, state actors from going to war. Sebastian Rosato states, “In practical terms democratic peace theory provides the intellectual justification for the belief that spreading democracy abroad will perform the dual task of enhancing American national security promoting world peace” (pg. 585).

    Read More

  • The Role Of The Monsters In Beowulf

    3014 Words  | 7 Pages

    ...ities to come together, and causes people to re-evaluate their relationships with one another, all toward ensuring that, on the whole, peace continues into the future.

    Read More

  • No Peace For Odysseus

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e was a strange beggar. After man has broken so many laws given by the gods, is there any possible chance that peace can ever be an option, or is peace just another figment of man’s imagination?

    Read More

  • Why Do Nations Go To War Essay

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    We need more peace-loving-people to help with the selfish needs of war. There are many different reasons as to why nations may go to war. In its simplest form, nations go to war because of self greed. They have an selfish desire for something. Not all reasons of why we go to war are selfish. Sometimes its for protection. There are two sides when reasoning about objectives of war; its a desire to better the way of life and to protect the way of life. For example, in the Revolutionary War, American people fought against Great Britain because they wanted to keep their independence. This is fighting for the protection of their life. And as many say, war is the absence of peace.

    Read More

  • Conflict In A Separate Peace

    2728 Words  | 6 Pages

    From past, present, to future, conflict has defined history. In a world full of battles, revolutions, and seemingly random acts of evil, it is impossible to escape the reality of it all. Many of today’s great classics have been inspired by generations of conflict. Using World War II as the background for John Knowles’ novel A Separate Peace brings up the question if it is ever possible to live in a world without fear, hate and ultimately inevitable conflict. Knowles uses contrasting characters, the innate nature of humans, and contradictory symbols in order to reflect that conflict is inevitable.

    Read More

  • Cuban Missile Crisis

    583 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ut both peace and freedom, here in this Hemisphere and, we hope, around the world.” (John F. Kennedy)

    Read More

  • Pacifist Vs. Pacifism

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...s toward peace”. Proving that being pacifist does not necessarily mean that war is unacceptable, it can also stand for bringing peace by a different point of view.

    Read More

  • The United States of Greece and Rome

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    On this planet there is only the one sure way to ensure peace, government. Luckily throughout history there have been big societies that helped countries establish governments of their own. One of the biggest and well shaped government is the democracy of the United States of America. The U.S. had two societies in particular to look to for guidance, and those two were ancient Greece and ancient Rome.

    Read More

  • The Cold War

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    “What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war, not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace -- the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living -- and the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and build a better life for their children -- not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women -- not merely peace in our time but peace in all time” (Kennedy)

    Read More

  • World War 1 Inevitable Essay

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea of peace is something everyone in the world likes to think is real, though in reality humanity is too arrogant and greedy to be able to settle their differences whether it be color of skin, whose got a bigger navy/gun. World War I was proof of this fact that war is inevitable. Even through diplomatic strategies and peace treaties there will always be someone whether it be a country in whole or one individual that will be there to tip the balance when the “bubble” get too big.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Kant´s Essay on Perpetual Peace

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Perhaps perpetual peace is hard to achieve, but one thing for sure is that nation-states would be consistently playing important roles in the global system. No doubt there is still increasing interconnectedness and interdependence between states, and hopefully one day we shall reach the perpetual peace.

    Read More

  • Peace and Security

    1910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Collective security is one type of coalition building strategy whether global or regional in which a group of nations agree not to attack each other and to defend each other against an attack from one of the others, if such an attack is made. The principal is that "an attack against one is an attack against all." It differs from "collective defense" which is a coalition of nations which agree to defend its own group against outside attacks. It can also be described as a system where states attempt with its use to prevent or stop wars. Examples of Collective defense are NATO and the Warsaw Pact .The United Nations (UN) is the best example at an attempt at collective security. Many nations enter into such an agreement in an effort to maintain the status quo and to secure their best interests. Collective security is achieved when states come to an agreement on the need for same. As a result an international organization is formed under the rules of international law. The collective security organization then becomes an arena for diplomacy, balance of power and exercise of soft power. The use of hard power by states, unless legitimized by the Collective Security organization, is considered illegitimate, reprehensible and needing remediation of some kind. This idea of collective security was posited by people such as Immanuel Kant and Woodrow Wilson. There are a few basic assumptions as it relates to collective security, including , In an armed conflict, member nation-states will be able to agree on which nation is the aggressor another basic assumption is that each member state has freedom of action and ability to join in proceedings against the aggressor. Also of great importance is the fact that all member nation-states are e...

    Read More

  • The concept of the Democratic Peace Theory

    1755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Russett, B., Oneal, John. (2001). "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations." New York: Norton.

    Read More

  • Peace is More than the Absence of War

    2217 Words  | 5 Pages

    The lives and prosperity of millions of people depend on peace and, in turn, peace depends on treaties - fragile documents that must do more than end wars. Negotiations and peace treaties may lead to decades of cooperation during which disputes between nations are resolved without military action and economic cost, or may prolong or even intensify the grievances which provoked conflict in the first place. In 1996, as Canada and the United States celebrated their mutual boundary as the longest undefended border in the world, Greece and Turkey nearly came to blows over a rocky island so small it scarcely had space for a flagpole.1 Both territorial questions had been raised as issues in peace treaties. The Treaty of Ghent in 1815 set the framework for the resolution of Canadian-American territorial questions. The Treaty of Sevres in 1920, between the Sultan and the victorious Allies of World War I, dismantled the remnants of the Ottoman Empire and distributed its territories. Examination of the terms and consequences of the two treaties clearly establishes that a successful treaty must provide more than the absence of war.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of World Peace

Open Document