John D. Rockefeller's Dominance Theory: Standard Oil Company

495 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: How was john d rockefeller an influence on the oil industry

The dominance theory is one where an organization controls the wealth, and this creates strength for the company. Issues arise when because of the power the organization that the superiority becomes excessive (Steiner & Steiner, p.64). John D. Rockefeller's supremacy allowed Standard Oil to become the dominant oil company with all the control over the industry. Standard Oil abused their clout because of their size and influenced policies surrounding the sector. They were part of the power elite and respected by his contemporary business leaders such as William Vanderbilt. Vanderbilt, a railroad trailblazer, remarked that he was one of the smartest and most able men in business. Rockefeller negotiated a discounted railroad rate for Standard Oil and his competitor. The reduction in fares went back to Standard Oil (Priest, 2011). This bargaining is an …show more content…

Seven levels of power are addressed in our text and Stanard Oil most prevalently possessed the economic, political, and legal power to control the oil industry (Steiner & Steiner, p.60-61). Standard Oil could acquire the competition and force those who resisted into bankruptcy. This consolidation was a detriment to the economy, but at the same time, Standard Oil built facilities and employed individuals that benefited the economy. They were known for their political power as well and accused of political corruption. Many leaders at the time believed Standard Oil controlled the Pennsylvania legislature (Pratt, 2012). On the national political scene, they became a target for reform and even with the company broken up continued their market dominance. The legal aspects of Rockefeller’s actions forcing competitors out of business raised concern for the government and citizens. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act addressed these issues and attempted to level the playing

Show More
Related

  • Negative Impact Of Robber Barons

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rockefeller was America’s first billionaire, and he was the true epitome of capitalism. Rockefeller was your typical rags-to-riches businessman, and at the turn of the twentieth century, while everyone else in the working class was earning ten dollars max every week, Rockefeller was earning millions. There has been much discussion as to whether Rockefeller’s success was due to being a “robber baron”, or as a “captain of industry”. By definition, a robber baron was an industrialist who exploited others in order to achieve personal wealth, however, Rockefeller’s effect on the economy and the lives of American citizens has been one of much impact, and deserves recognition. He introduced un-seen techniques that greatly modified the oil industry. During the mid-nineteenth century, there was a high demand for kerosene. In the refining process from transforming crude oil to kerosene, many wastes were produced. While others deemed the waste useless, Rockefeller turned it into income by selling them. He turned those wastes into objects that would be useful elsewhere, and in return, he amassed a large amount of wealth. He sold so much “waste” that railroad companies were desperate to be a part of his company. However, Rockefeller demanded rebates, or discounted rates, from the railroad companies, when they asked to be involved with his business. By doing so, Rockefeller was able to lower the price of oil to his customers, and pay low wages to his workers. Using these methods,

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Ida Tarbell The Muckraker

    1872 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the late 1800's and early 1900's, change in American society was very evident in the economy. An extraordinary expansion of the industrial economy was taking place, presenting new forms of business organization and bringing trusts and holding companies into the national picture. The turn of the century is known as the "Great Merger Movement:" over two thousand corporations were "swallowed up" by one hundred and fifty giant holding companies.1 This powerful change in industry brought about controversy and was a source of social anxiety. How were people to deal with this great movement and understand the reasons behind the new advancements? Through the use of propaganda, the public was enlightened and the trusts were attacked. Muckraking, a term categorizing this type of journalism, began in 1903 and lasted until 1912. It uncovered the dirt of trusts and accurately voiced the public's alarm of this new form of industrial control. Ida Tarbell, a known muckraker, spearheaded this popular investigative movement.2 As a journalist, she produced one of the most detailed examinations of a monopolistic trust, The Standard Oil Company.3 Taking on a difficult responsibility and using her unique journalistic skills, Ida Tarbell was able to get to the bottom of a scheme that allowed the oil industry to be manipulated by a single man, John D. Rockefeller.

    Read More

  • Laissez-Faire Policy During The Gilded Age

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Gilded Age refers to a period in which things were fraudulent and deceitful; the surface was clinquant while underneath that lustrous coat laid corruption. During the Gilded Age companies recruited to corrupt methods to further increase profits, leading to an increase in power, rapid economic prosperity, and domination of industries, leading to monopolistic corporations. As a result, antitrust laws to regulate business began to emerge in the late 19th and early 20th century known as the Progressive Era. Among these companies was Standard Oil, which was founded in 1870 by John D. Rockefeller; in 1880, Standard Oil was responsible for refining 90 percent of America’s oil and between 1880-1910, dominating the oil industry (Marshall). The lack of intervention from the government and regulations impeding monopolistic practices allowed Standard Oil to

    Read More

  • John D. Rockefeller as a Robber Baron

    3611 Words  | 8 Pages

    Matthew Josephson agreed that Rockefeller was indeed a "robber baron". In the book Taking Sides, he claims that Rockefeller was a deceptive and conspiratorial businessman, whose fortune was built by secret agreements and wrung concessions from America's leading railroad companies (Taking Sides 25). When John D. Rockefeller merged with the railroad companies, he had gained control of a strategic transportation route that no other companies would be able to use. Rockefeller would then be able to force the hand on the railroads and was granted a rebate on his shipments of oil. This was a kind of secret agreement between the two industries.

    Read More

  • Monopolies In The Gilded Age

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful

    Read More

  • Robber Barons

    570 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people consider Rockefeller a robber of industry because of his forcible ways of gaining his monopolies. Rockefeller was fond of buying out small and large competitors. If the competitors refused to sell they often found Rockefeller cutting the prices of his Standard Oil or in the worst cases, their factories mysteriously blowing up. Rockefeller was obsessed with controlling the oil market and used many of undesirable tactics to flush his competitors out of the market. Rockefeller was also a master of the rebate game. He was one of the most dominant controllers of the railroads. He was so good at the rebate that at some times he skillfully commanded the rail road to pay rebates to his standard oil company on the traffic of other competitors. He was able to do this because his oil traffic was so high that he could make or break a section of a railroad a railroad company by simply not running...

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller

    629 Words  | 2 Pages

    Let us first look at Mr. Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie was a mogul in the steel industry. Carnegie developed a system known as the vertical integration. This method basically cut out the ‘middle man’. Carnegie bought his own iron and coal mines (which were necessities in producing steel) because purchasing these materials from independent companies cost too much and was insufficient for Carnegie’s empire. This hurt his competitors because they still had to pay for raw materials at much higher prices. Unlike Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller integrated his oil business from top to bottom. Rockefeller’s system was considered a ‘horizontal’ integration. This meant that he followed one product through all phases of the production process, i.e. Rockefeller had control over the oil from the moment it was drilled to the moment it was sold to the consu...

    Read More

  • Oil Dbq Oil

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...nd eventually morph it into what it has become modernly. The industry is transformed over time into a cut-throat game of international relations. The United States specifically becomes overwhelmed with the amount of public relations that are involved. In many cases, the country has much more pull in the affairs than that of the United States’ interests. As a result, President Eisenhower imposes mandatory quotas which protect domestic oil and stabilize the price of U.S. oil.

    Read More

  • Laws for Fair, Balanced and Competitive Business Practice

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States has several laws that ensure that competition among businesses flow rely and new competitors get free access to the market. These laws intend to ensure fair and balanced competitive business practices. However, there are times when some businesses will do anything to gain competitive edge. USA has strong antitrust laws that prohibit fixing market price, price discrimination, conspiring boycott, monopolizing, and adopting unfair business practices. The history of Antitrust laws goes back to 1890 when Congress passed Sherman Act. In 1914, Congress passed two more acts: Federal Trade Commission Act, and Clayton Act. With some revisions, these three acts are still core antitrust acts.

    Read More

  • Cornelius Vanderbilt

    2191 Words  | 5 Pages

    Vanderbilt sought to limit competition by creating business trusts and lowering prices in order to monopolize other railroad and steamboat businesses. In the steamboat industry, while Vanderbilt was working for Gibbons, he was able to lower ticket prices to an obscenely low amount by making the cost of food on the boat higher. Other steamboat companies viewed this as illegal because the government regulated the cost of the tickets and Vanderbilt was going below to regulatory cost. Finally after much dis...

    Read More

  • Essay On John D Rockefeller

    2193 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...mpanies, it eventually came to the point where they couldn’t keep up and eventually became a part of Standard Oil. By the time Rockefeller had reached the age of 40, his company had controlled all national oil refining by 90% and about 70% of international export of said oil.

    Read More

  • John D. Rockefeller

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ichest men in the world, monopolizing the oil industry, which played an important role in shaping the economy. In today’s oil business Rockefeller’s effect can still be seem in business strategies, values, and competitive logic. The oil business is now structured and very competitive. It also plays many important roles in the economy.

    Read More

  • The Transcontinental Railroad

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ich developed new corporations. (Gillon p.652) Many in the railroad industry and these newly developed corporations were accused of price fixing, providing illegal kick- backs and challenging government regulations. (Gillon p.652-657) Thus, one could argue that the railroad industry and the titans it produced had a monopolistic approach to business that actually challenged the free market system.

    Read More

  • John D. Rockefeller

    1566 Words  | 4 Pages

    During John D. Rockefeller’s financial career in The Gilded Age, he used many cutthroat practices to ensure that local competitors would not challenge and he would have control over the market of oil with his Standard Oil Company. In order to make sure he controlled the oil market, he used what was known as horizontal integration. This name became the label for the process of eliminating any potential competition from the market that one wishes to succeed in. In order to establish a virtual monopoly over the oil market, Rockefeller used clever strategies to do so. John Rockefeller used “his firm's superi...

    Read More

  • John D. Rockefeller

    1673 Words  | 4 Pages

    John D. Rockefeller, born on July 8, 1839, has had a huge impact on the course of American history, his reputation spanning from being a ruthless businessperson to a thoughtful philanthropist (Tarbell 41). He came from a family with not much and lived the American dream, rising to success through his own wit and cunning, riding on the backs of none. His legacy is huge, amassing the greatest private wealth of any American in history. Rockefeller’s influence on our country has been both a positive and a negative one, he donated huge sums of money to various public institutions and revolutionized the petroleum industry. Along with all the positives to the country, Rockefeller also had many negative affects as well, including, by gaining his riches by means of a monopoly, often using illegal methods, by giving others a reason to frown upon capitalism, and by hurting smaller businesses.

    Read More

More about John D. Rockefeller's Dominance Theory: Standard Oil Company

Open Document