Imagine you and your wife are peacefully sleeping, and then there’s a bang on the door. You get dragged out of your house, a man you don’t even know starts hacking at you. Later. shoot you a shot. John Brown didn’t do many good things, he fought for a good cause, but did some brutal things to accomplish his goals. He was a famous abolitionist known for freeing slaves but also committing several crimes. It’s important to brand John Brown as a villain because history is doomed to repeat itself and if people in the future learn that John Brown is a hero, then they might use his tactics to solve some other world problem. Not only that, John Brown was a villain because he killed people even if they didn’t have slaves. He said he didn’t mean to make …show more content…
A letter from Mahala Doyle states that he murdered her husband and son. She also says that they did not own slaves and “never expected to own one”(Mahala Doyle Document E). In some documents, there is also evidence that Brown killed so many people, most of whom didn’t even own slaves, that his own followers started to get scared of him. As a rule, when someone's family dies and they want to write a letter to the murderer, they usually pour their heart into that letter. Mahala Doyle was obviously stating how she didn’t like John Brown for killing his family for no reason. John Brown and another group liberated slaves, took men captive, and even killed a man. He even admits that he “took some property”. Killed one white man”(John Brown Document A). He also forcefully liberated slaves, which means he was willing to use violence (which he did) to free slaves. As a rule, if you kill someone you are committing treason whether people know you killed that person or not. Brown is just openly admitting that someone working under his influence killed someone, he published this in a newspaper, as if he wanted people to know what he could …show more content…
But isn’t it true that he not only tried to raid the arsenal, he also murdered people, injured people, and destroyed/took property from other people, and the only good thing he did was free slaves. Even though he liberated a lot of slaves, he still committed a decent amount of crimes to do so. Not only that, he also influenced other people to murder people with him. John Brown was a villain because he killed people, started a rebellion among slaves, and took people captive. Just think of the poor husband and kids that John Brown killed, even though they didn’t have slaves and didn’t plan on ever owning them. And yes, he did free a lot of slaves, but he still committed way too many crimes to even count. So, after reading about John Brown, do you really think he’s a good
people argue whether John Brown fits that description, or is the opposite. John Brown was an abolitionist Missouri settler, former businessman, and had arguably gone mad, dedicating his life to the abolishment of slavery. This essay sheds light on whether he was a hero or a terrorist, and does justice to John Brown’s story. A story that many misunderstand, and take advantage of to call him a villain. However, John Brown was certainly a civil war hero. To start off, John Brown played a major role
Many people believe that John Brown is a villain for murdering people, making slaves revolt against the government, and for committing treasonous acts. John Brown was a brutal abolitionist born in the 1800s. As a kid, he really hated slavery and would kill anyone to end it. Because of this, he went on a rampage to free slaves and forced the masters to liberate their slaves, or they would kill them. My first evidence of why John Brown was a villain is that he killed people supposedly in the name of
Abolitionists Strategies of Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, and John Brown Abolitionist Movement was a reform movement during the 18th and 19th centuries. Often called the antislavery movement, it sought to end the enslavement of Africans and people of African descent in Europe, the Americas, and Africa itself. It also aimed to end the Atlantic slave trade carried out in the Atlantic Ocean between Africa, Europe, and the Americas. Many people participated in trying to end slavery. These
John Brown was a man who lived in the mid eighteen-hundreds and who fought against the evil of slavery. He had a very strong belief that slavery was unjust, and this is true, but he thought that in order to abolish slavery, violence would be the best method. That’s where he went wrong. John Brown led two attacks on slave owners and those who supported slavery, the first at Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas on May 24th, 1856, and the second at Harper Ferry, Virginia on October 16th, 1859. At Pottawatomie
slavery and make the fear of slave insurrection strengthen? His name is John brown and one might say that this former slave and black abolitionist just wanted to end slavery by causing violence between the north and the south. But to his men, his only intention was to start a general slave insurrection. For example he went to Harper 's Ferry and raided an armory with the intention of starting an armed slave army. Soon Brown became doubtful of this plan a couple of months into it and as he warned
John Brown, who was an abolitionist, led a group on a raid against a federal armory in Harpers Ferry which at time was in Western Virginia. This was an attempt to start an armed slave revolt and abolish slavery. John Brown was born in Connecticut in 1800 and was raised in Ohio. He came from an antislavery family which added to his want to free the slaves. He never succeeded at any business projects and resulted into his increased debt. In 1837 His life changed when he attended an abolition meeting
There is a period of time in American history where slavery was not only allowed, but part of the original Constitution. However, for as many who were for slavery there was always a number against it. Slaves themselves, like Frederick Douglass in his autobiography Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, have criticized slavery as well as American writers, like Henry David Thoreau in his speech "Slavery in Massachusetts". Despite these two abolitionists being separated by class and education
with her. Nacha dies from sorrow of loss of her love and throughout the story appears as a kindly ghost. Pedro and Rosaura move away from the ranch leaving Tita alone. She then discovers her love for a local doctor, John Brown, who cares for her deeply. Tita realizes her love for John could never compare to her suppressed feelings for Pedro. As the story progresses, many tragedies occur, but Tita and Pedro still have undying love for each other. Each of us is born with a box of matches inside
In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting three inspirational people and their experiences on reading and writing. Frederick Douglass, Malcolm X, and Sandra Cisneros all had different opinions about it. All of them overcame struggles that were different but similar in some way. What really intrigued me was that they followed their hearts in what they wanted to do even though people told them they couldn't. Frederick Douglass was born into slavery; that's what he thought he was
Harriet Tubman (1820-1913) Harriet Tubman is probably the most famous “conductor” of all the Underground Railroads. Throughout a 10-year span, Tubman made more than 20 trips down to the South and lead over 300 slaves from bondage to freedom. Perhaps the most shocking fact about Tubman’s journeys back and forth from the South was that she “never lost a single passenger.” Harriet Tubman was born into slavery in Maryland around 1820. By the time Tubman had reached the age of 5 or 6, she started
U-20 on May 7, 1915. 1198 people died of a total of 1959 people on the boat. The ship sunk in 18 minutes. Second most famous passenger liner after the Titanic. It was destroyed 8 miles from the coast of Old head of Kinsale, Ireland. Built by John Brown and company of Clydebank, Scotland. First Launched Thursday, June 7, 1906. After the Sinking of Lusitania the U.S threatened war. The Lusitania was destroyed in the same was as the Titanic as they could not pull the boats into the sea and water
Cardinal Newman’s definition of a university can be used to describe the acquisition of knowledge by Frederick Douglass, Eudora Welty and Malcolm X. John Henry Newman believed a university is a place of universal learning; a place where different people of different backgrounds come together under one roof. This type of definition has more of the appeal of Eudora Welty; where she was taught in a classroom lesson after lesson. However, this held true neither for Frederick Douglass nor for Malcolm
servant at ages five through six and became a field worker at age seven. She received an injury while protecting another slave from an angry overseer and was hit on the head. She would fall into deep sleeps randomly for the rest of her life. She married John Tubman in 1844 who was also a free black man. In 1849, Tubman thought that she would be sold so she decided to run away. She left at night on foot. Tubman got help from a white woman along the way. She followed the North Star at night. She finally
lives could only prevail if slavery survived and expanded westward, what they knew was morally right (3, 92). John Brown is one abolitionist who stands out amongst the rest and has been noted as one of the most important men in the process of abolishing slavery. It was Brown’s work that sparked the revolts and fighting that would occur between the North and the South after his time. Brown can be considered a hero on account of his actions in Kentucky and Virginia. After the Turner revolt, the topic
This is following the family tradition that the youngest daughter takes care of the mother until she dies. With her frivolous wants, Mama Elena denies her marriage and happiness to any man especially Pedro. She eventually breaks down and meets John Brown, the family doctor, who recovers her until she finds happiness again after Mama Elena's death with Pedro. Overall, Tita goes through a very dynamic change in the story which obviously entitles her to be a main character. 2. Mama Elena Quote: