This is a stuff case as two individuals are involve and both needs to be correct, but after carefully reviewing each alternative to solve the issue the best alternative is application of the policy in place by the company. Although at first it seems more reasonable to reprimand the boss, the employee’s action is greater than the boss. The boos is acting in good faith although incorrectly, where as the employees is acting consciously knowing that what he’s doing is wrong. The fact that the employee is lying and taking advantage of his boss, is unethical and amoral. Is not fair to the boss or coworker his action, as he meddle with the health of the company’s environment by creating discomfort and frustrations among employees.
If held accountable for unacceptable behaviors, it will often turn this performance around. If not, after a certain amount of warnings, it becomes obvious that this person does not take his job very seriously, and therefore may be dismissed. Accountability in the workforce holds each employee responsible for his or her actions. This can include getting to work on time, maintaining a work schedule, and being able to fulfill the requirements of the job.
Another time some form of resistance should be shown would be in the case of a supervisor or manager on a "power-trip". A person should not just let a manager create work or assign jobs that do nothing more than waste valuable manpower because it makes them feel important. My last example of resistance in the workplace is competition between departments that hinders the progress of the other department. Ideally none of this would happen but in today's society ware everyone is out for himself or herself sometimes someone has to shake things up a bit. One of the main causes for resistance in the workplace would be an employee getting passed up for a promotion that they are the most qualified to receive.
[[Image:Tell Your Boss You 've Made a Major Mistake Step 4 Version 2.jpg|center]] #*While taking the lead on fixing things would be the best case scenario, keep in mind that your boss may not allow this. Be flexible and agreeable if the boss wants you to work with others or is skeptical about you handling it alone. #*Stay positive even if you are getting negative feedback from around you. There was a mistake made and co-workers may comment about it, but your focus should be on making things right, not the drama around the office.http://quickbase.intuit.com/blog/reader-question-taking-responsibility-for-mistakes-at-work #Formulate a plan with your boss’s help. Ask your boss for direction and do as you are told.
The change in management that cased the reduction in staff and rigid rules was perceived as a threat by the remaining staff. A more seasoned manager most likely would have recognized that people are different. While some people come to work to earn money this fulfilling existence needs, some desire to related to others, or earn promotion, which is growth need. The expectancy theory states that an individual will decide to behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behavior over other behaviors due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be. However, the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements also comes into play.
The manager felt inequity in the work he put in and the rising percentage problem. Therefore, according to the Equity Theory the manger acted to eliminate the inequity he viewed as problematic. The Expectancy Theory is disregarded by the manager as relationships within the company determine work motivation. Forcing employees to take a lie detector test with strain the managerial-employee relationship. The Goal-Setting Theory was also negated by the manager with the decision to make employees take the lie detector test.
The third concern is that because the preceding evaluation went bad with the engineer that the manager might back out in giving the engineer his evaluation. This is very important for the engineer to receive this feedback to help him improve. Since the performance evaluatio... ... middle of paper ... ... in our scenario; the manager is reluctant to give the evaluation because the engineer became very angry with the results on the preceding review. The best solution to this in our scenario is not to ignore it, but to train the manager to be competent to conduct constructive feedback. Performance evaluations are very important and with the proper training, and the best method, giving an evaluation does not have to be painful.
A large portion of training programs or affiliate training programs will be listed on your employers website. Take a look and note any particular ones of interest, or any that you feel can help you improve your work performance. You should also take a look at your contract of employment to see if any job training courses are actually mandatory to your employment with the company. It really should go without saying, but you should never be afraid to ask for training while in employment. If you feel that you aren’t adequately trained to do your job properly you really must stand up and say something, not just for your own well being but also for the good of the company.
If we do not work we won’t have the money to buy our necessities. If you want to improve your value as an employee, then know your duties inside and out and pay attention to detail. The more you know what to do and when to do it, the more it allows your supervisor to devote his attention to other areas in the company. A good worker needs values to succeed: to be well dressed, a self motivated a good attitude. First at all, a good applicant should be well dress because job applicants should arrive at job interviews are being critically observed from the time they enter in the building and sometimes in the parking lot beforehand.
2) The repercussion of moving into new international markets without the appropriate organizational design could be a disaster. With no formulated plan the merge in to foreign countries will result in failure. 3) I recommend that the company seek optional plans that will benefit the strategic plan and mission of the organization. Ethic Case 1) If I were in Tom’s position I too wold feel very uneasy. Although with serious though Tom was chosen as the laison of production this mean his peers and boss trust his work.