Japanese Imperialism

1910 Words4 Pages

During the beginning of the Meiji Period, Japan was originally a weak military nation controlled by feudal lords. The Tokugawa shogun had lost power and was overthrown by the emperor as the head of Japan. As a nation, Japan could not compete against Western powers; it had been forced into treaties that restricted its control in foreign trade. By 1872, reforms were established in the tax system that allowed for a stabilized budget, and gradually, Japan was able to build its strength. In the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895), Japan gained victory against China over claim of Korea. This victory brought concern to European powers and would continue to grow as Japan embarked on an imperialistic campaign dominated by militaristic leaders. Militarism …show more content…

At the Potsdam Conference, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, the Republic of China, and the United States gathered together and created the Potsdam Declaration, which set the terms of surrender for Japan. Germany had already surrendered in May 7, 1945 and this defeat of German resistance as expressed in the document, was to set an example to the people of Japan. Japan must choose between its continued control by militaristic advisers and complete defeat or surrender and turn to democracy. This comparison to the defeat of Germany illustrated the extent to which devastation would continue to be inflicted upon Japan until they agreed to surrender. The Allies intended with this term to push Japan into the direction of democracy in contrast to its militaristic nature. With the casualties of WWII and the threat of communist influence looming near, the Allies could not afford to have Japan remain as a threat with its military power. Specifically expressed in the Potsdam Declaration, it called for military disarmament and militaristic influence eliminated to destroy war making power. The Allies believed that by stripping Japan of its military power, there would be peace and security. With Japan’s current involvement in the war and its previous invasion of Manchuria, the Allies wanted to eliminate the threat Japan could impose to the world. …show more content…

were all in accordance to the aims of the Allies to bring about democratic principles into Japan without the presence of militarism influence. Although these aims felt rather forced upon the people of Japan, they were in fact not so much so. With the new constitution, although written by American writers, they were done so in consideration to the ideas of the people. The people of Japan had responded to the opportunity through proposals for constitutional revisions of the Meiji Constitution from various parties. This was representative of the Taisho period that was just about to end, where citizens were beginning to want more say in the government and more freedoms. They were disillusioned by their militaristic leaders who had brought misfortune to Japan, and so were willing to follow the U.S reforms pressed onto them. This is similar to that of the Progressive Era in the U.S. where Americans were suffering harsh conditions under the control of corruption. There was a denial to Social Darwinism that expressed survival of the fittest, in which only the strong and rich businesses survived and the poor were to remain poor because they deserved it. In response, Progressives called for the government to be an agency of human welfare, to push reforms for more rights and better conditions for the people.

Open Document