More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of values on society
The importance of teaching moral values at school
Societal role of moral education of a child
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of values on society
Without proper and strict moral values, humans are no different than savages. People tried to teach moral values to the younger generation. In the search for an appropriate way to get moral values across, a variety of approaches are being tried. In 1970, Jane Elliott, a teacher at Community Elementary school in Riceville, Iowa taught her third-grade students moral values by letting them experience social discrimination themselves directly. After Elliott’s approach gained a huge attention, a new approach called “moral dilemma” appeared in a Pittsburgh junior high school. “Moral dilemma” basically tells the children what the moral issue is and lets them express their opinions freely. Jane Elliott’s approach and the “moral dilemma” approach both are great methods of instilling children’s moral values, but the real experiences which was offered by Jane Elliott’s approach of racial discrimination tops the “moral dilemma” approach, which let children to discuss moral issues freely on their own. Jane Elliott’s approach is still needed nowadays for teaching children to know what’s morally right and wrong. Although President Johnson sighed the civil rights act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on skin color, race, and etc., social discrimination against African Americans still lingered in the society for decades. Jane Elliott, an elementary …show more content…
First, it was given to junior high school students. Junior high students usually are about 12 years old. They already developed a basic idea of what is right and wrong. So they should be able to judge an issue’s morality on their own. The students were given a moral dilemma situation, and they would discuss their individual feelings about whether it is right or wrong. And “this helps children move toward a point where they wish to be ethical because they themselves think it’s right” (Etzioni,
Morals are set standards of right and wrong for society as a whole. One ’s self image of morals are what the individual thinks is right and wrong according to what he or she learns; however, this “Internal compass” can be influenced because society controls most of what they learn. One’s self image of morals allows an individual to provide compelling arguments, provides emotional stability and allows for an individual to have predetermined views of right and wrong; on account of the fact that said individuals choose to follow the revolutionary figures who provide a strong base for the creation of one’s self image of morals. In most cases, religion plays a major role in the creation of this aspect of identity; made evident in Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in which, through use of historical and religious examples, Dr. King justifies his participation in a non-violent protest to expedite the process of integration. Also, “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne shows how an individual’s self image of morals provide a strong emotional base and an unwavering sense of right and wrong. Even my own experiences have led me to believe that having a strong self image of morals allows an individual to be emotionally stable, and have a strong sense of right and wrong.
For 75 years following reconstruction the United States made little advancement towards racial equality. Many parts of the nation enacted Jim Crowe laws making separation of the races not just a matter of practice but a matter of law. The laws were implemented with the explicit purpose of keeping black American’s from being able to enjoy the rights and freedoms their white counterparts took for granted. Despite the efforts of so many nameless forgotten heroes, the fate of African Americans seemed to be in the hands of a racist society bent on keeping them down; however that all began to change following World War II. Thousands of African American men returned from Europe with a renewed purpose and determined to break the proverbial chains segregation had keep them in since the end of the American Civil War. With a piece of Civil Rights legislation in 1957, the federal government took its first step towards breaking the bonds that had held too many citizens down for far too long. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was a watered down version of the law initially proposed but what has been perceived as a small step towards correcting the mistakes of the past was actually a giant leap forward for a nation still stuck in the muck of racial division. What some historians have dismissed as an insignificant and weak act was perhaps the most important law passed during the nation’s civil rights movement, because it was the first and that cannot be underestimated.
Although many laws were passed that recognized African Americans as equals, the liberties they had been promised were not being upheld. Hoffman, Blum, and Gjerde state that “Union League members in a North Carolina county, upon learning of three or four black men who ‘didn’t mean to vote,’ threatened to ‘whip them’ and ‘made them go.’ In another country, ‘some few colored men who declined voting’ were, in the words of a white conservative, ‘bitterly persecute[ed]” (22). Black codes were also made to control African Americans. Norton et al. states that “the new black codes compelled former slaves to carry passes, observe a curfew, live in housing provided by a landowner, and give up hope of entering many desirable occupations” (476). The discrimination and violence towards African Americans during this era and the laws passed that were not being enforced were very disgraceful. However, Reconstruction was a huge stepping stone for the way our nation is shaped today. It wasn’t pretty but it was the step our nation needed to take. We now live in a country where no matter the race, everyone is considered equal. Reconstruction was a success. Without it, who knows where our nation would be today. African American may have never gained the freedoms they have today without the
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., & Bebeau, M. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644-659.
The societies and aids that contributed to the dawning of the Civil Rights movement in 1955 fought for racial equality and led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, or gender and eventually established the Voting Act of 1965 that banned discrimination against voters (Zoeller 2.) African Americans transitioned into the twentieth century with hopes of overcoming obstacles against prejudice to obtain equality for all Americans.
...of religion, the freedom to assemble and civil rights such as the right to be free from discrimination such as gender, race, religion, and sexual orientation. Throughout history, African Americans have endured discrimination, segregation, and racism and have progressively gained rights and freedoms by pushing civil rights movement across America. This paper addressed several African American racial events that took place in our nation’s history. These events were pivotal and ultimately led to the establishment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Civil Rights Act paved the way for future legislation that was not limited to African American civil rights and is considered a landmark piece of legislation that ending racism, segregation and discrimination throughout the United States.
After the emancipation of slaves in 1862, the status of African-Americans in post civil war America up until the beginning of the twentieth century did not go through a great deal of change. Much legislation was passed to help blacks in this period. The Civil Rights act of 1875 prohibited segregation in public facilities and various government amendments gave African-Americans even more guaranteed rights. Even with this government legislation, the newly dubbed 'freedmen' were still discriminated against by most people and, ironically, they were soon to be restricted and segregated once again under government rulings in important court cases of the era.
In order to become a well rounded individual you must be aware of the moral problems in society and be able to evaluate them. Respectively, this class has allowed me to do so, through readings and videos, providing my own insight on many moral issues. This class has shown me there are many different interpretations to right and wrong, and hard evidence must be agued to be persuasive. Throughout the course of this class we looked into multiple philosophers such as Kant, Aristotle, and Sandel, a professor at Harvard.
We have seen in 1957, and 1960, and again in 1964, the first civil rights legislation in this Nation in almost an entire century”. From the very beginning, Johnson was determined to become an influential individual and make a difference in the world. He said, “No act of my entire administration will give me greater satisfaction than the day when my signature makes this bill, too, the law of this land” and he meant it. Through the Civil Rights Act, Johnson was able to do just that.
President Andrew Johnson did not support it, but his veto was overridden. After the bill passed he refused to enforce the law in the South, causing little effect. On top of President Johnson’s lack of approval, it was undermined by anti-black organizations, and it helped women and Native Americans even less than it did for African Americans. Native Americans were excluded from being considered citizens even if they were born in the United States. Women gained the right to make and enforce contracts, purchase land, and more, but they were not given the right to vote for another fifty years. In theory this act should have resulted in better treatment of African American because it was making them separate but equal to white people, but in reality when it was put in action it did not follow through with its original intentions. Much like the in 1866, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was followed by incidents of resistance and violence, but despite the proceedings this act declared that all citizens despite race, sex, religion, or national origin were not to be discriminated against. Within the first few weeks, segregated establishments were open to black patrons, and Jim Crow laws were starting to end. The laws giving minorities their civil rights were being enforced. This bill not only encompassed African Americans, but it gave women more opportunities. By 1924 Native Americans
Before World War II, although Abraham Lincoln had spoken the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the U.S. had gone through the Civil War around 1861, not much had significantly changed for African-Americans. Really nothing changed for African-Americans until much later, around the 1960s, when schools legally had to integrate African-Americans and whites. In relation to other events, World War II began in 1939, Jackie Robinson started on first base in 1947, and Rosa Parks was arrested in 1961. Therefore, at the time leading up to and shortly before World War II, there was not much effective action in terms of equal rights for all races. However, as seen here, after World War II, equality between races became a very prominent, pressing issue. This can partially be traced back to the effect of African-Americans in World War II.
(2012). Vygotsky from ZPD to ZCD in moral education: reshaping Western theory and practices in local context. Journal Of Moral Education, 41(2), 225-243. doi:10
As Philosophy Basics describes, “Ethics is concerned with questions of how people ought to act, and the search for a definition of right conduct”. Ethics is very important in life. A child’s early stages of learning is essential for their future. Knowing what is right vs wrong is a way to be able to interact with others. A way to make smart decisions for themselves. My first grade teacher had a poster on the wall with little fish. The top had a good amount of fish as the bottom only had one. It stated, “Only because the majority does it, doesn’t mean it’s right, and just because one person does it doesn’t mean it’s wrong.” The image always stuck with me. Ethics is not something that is just learned in a classroom but something that is implied in daily usage with one another or just
The role of education in Moral development is very significant. In the present schooling scenario, moral education is confined to teaching values and morals. But the aim of education is not just to teach these values and morals. It must aim at the moral development of the child. Therefore, one must have a clear understanding of what must be included in moral education and how should it be implemented. In this essay, I will argue the importance of education in the moral development of a learner through three ideas. Ideas of care, ideas of self-understanding and ideas of rational practice.
Moral development focuses on “the emergence, change, and understanding of morality from infancy through adulthood” (Wikipedia, 2013). Morality is defined as “principles for how individuals ought to treat one another, with respect to justice, other’s welfare, and rights” (Banks, 2013). To better understand how individuals understand morality, “it is essential to measure their beliefs, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors that contribute to moral understanding” (Wikipedia, 2013). The moral development of a person’s character will have a major impact on society as whole. Most importantly the moral responsibilities need to be taught to children at a young age because early years remain crucial to later development (Wikipedia, 2013). There are two theories that provided several stages of moral development. The first theorist is Kohlberg, who came up with “three levels of moral reasoning: Premoral, Convention, and Principled” (Banks, 2013). The second theorist is Gilligan, who “believed that females went through three stages of moral development, morality as individual, morality as self-sacrifice, and morality as equality” (Banks, 2013).