James King Guilty Of Alguinaldo Nesbit's Murder

In the Lexington, Kentucky a drug operation occurred at an apartment complex. Police officers of Lexington, Kentucky followed a suspected drug dealer into an apartment complex. The officers smelled marijuana outside the door of one of the apartments, as they knocked loudly the officers announced their presence. There were noises coming from the inside of the apartment; the officers believed that the noises were as the sound of destroying evidence. The officers stated that they were about to enter the apartment and kicked the apartment door in in order to save the save any evidence from being destroyed. Once the officer enters the apartment; there the respondent and others were found. The officers took the respondent and the other individuals that were in the apartment into custody. The King and the

The jurors took a vote and saw the ratio at eleven for guilty and only one for not guilty. When they repeatedly attacked his point of view, his starting defense was that the boy was innocent until proven guilty, not the opposite as the others had seen it. After Henry Fonda instilled doubt in the mind of another juror, the two worked together to weaken the barriers of hatred and prejudice that prevented them from seeing the truth. The jurors changed their minds one at a time until the ratio stood again at eleven to one, this time in favor of acquittal. At this point, the jurors who believed the defendant was not guilty worked together to prove to the one opposing man that justice would only be found if they returned a verdict of not guilty. They proved this man wrong by using his personal experiences in life to draw him into a series of deadly contradictions.

In order to reasonably deduce who the murderer is we first need to use economic reasoning to understand who it is not. Spearman manages to use the economic concept of game theory to explain why two of the most incentivized characters in the novel and the confessors of the crimes, Ricky LeMans and Vernon Harbley, indeed admit to a crime they never actually commit. Game theory as explained by Eric P. Chiang in CoreMicreconomics is, “the study of strategy and strategic behavior and is used in any situation in which one must predict the actions of others and respond by choosing among more than one strategy, each resulting in a potentially

Facts: Rex Marshall testified that the deceased came into his store intoxicated, and started whispering things to his wife. The defendant stated that he ordered the deceased out of the store immediately, however the deceased refused to leave and started acting in an aggressive manner; by slamming his hate down on the counter. He then reached for the hammer, the defendant states he had reason to believe the deceased was going to hit him with the hammer attempting to kill him. Once the deceased reached for the hammer the defendant shot him almost immediately.

There was other evidence than the forensics that matched Sacco’s gun to the bullets found in the two victims. Upon their arrest protests broke out worldwide based on their innocence. The two men were executed due to an unfair trial.

In the beginning Alvin Hooks brings his very first witness to the stand sheriff Art Moran which was a minor character throughout the story but had to still testify. The sheriff explained that last night it was foggy on the lake and the boat lights where still on. Therefore he and his deputy came out to Carl’s boat later on the next day to see if everything was alright. Once they made their way to the boat they found that everything was clean except for a coffee cup on the floor. Later on, the sheriff found Carl’s net which contained him. They brought up the net from the water which had his dead body in it. They witness that they have seen a wound on the side of Carl’s head. Alvin hooks replies with disgust knowingly convincing the jurors already that Mr. Miyamoto is the one that killed Carl.

The suspect had a chip tooth and Antonio had A gap that was really the only reason he got convicted. There three other suspects didn’t even get close to how Antonio Beaver had allot of similarity’s like the victim that did that crime. The best way to know if the suspect did the crime is doing allot of deep research instead of just going off a shecht artist.

Everybody had an opinion on what happened at the Ramsey household on December 25, 1996. Most people believed that the family is responsible for killing JonBenet. Ever since that day, the public has held the Ramsey family under a cloud of suspicion. The family did everything they could do to defend themselves. They believe that an intruder must have done it, but most of the public believes that the family should be held responsible for the killing. The main suspect that police keyed in on was the mother of JonBenet. The reason for the suspicion of the mother was the 911 call made by Patsy Ramsey the day of the murder. In this 911 call, the mother seemed very suspicious. Patsy said “We have a kidnapping” ( McClish). “It seemed like she knew something she was not telling” (McClish 2001).

James took me to a room near the mall office where Jones was located. Jones was seated at a table. The stolen merchandise was on the table beside her. Also on the table was her purse, and other personal items that she had in her possession at the time of the incident.

Miller remembered the night of the murder after spending 2 weeks with the internal fairs department in the court room, and the testimony of 3 sworn witnesses, one of which was Ms. Miller who claimed that she saw Officer Woods and his partner pull over the Adams and Harris. She is the real reason that Adams was convicted because of her claim of saying that Adams was the man that had shot Officer Woods because she saw him in the driver's seat. Her and her husband make claims that they heard some sort of fire crackers but realized it was gun shots as they were from a distance. Morris uses more reenactments of the shooting and you can see as the camera rolls you see a driver in the driver seat but you can't really make out who it is besides that he has a mustache and the driver window rolling down but the screen goes black as soon as you hear gun shots. We later find out that Miller made claims that she was leaving the gas station where she worked early but was released that she was fired 2 weeks prior from the gas station. But the real reason they were speaking to the police was because there was a knife fight at her apartment and was booked for being drunk and disorderly. Morris shows a newspaper that offers a $21,000 reward for the conviction of the murder. Morris interviews a lady that made claims of talking to Millers husband saying that he hadn't seen a damn thing and that he was pondering the