James K. Polk Dbq

571 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Politics of the Mexican American War

James K. Polk was elected President in 1844, taking office in March of 1845 as the youngest president in history at the time. His presidency was filled with much controversy, as he proved himself a vehement supporter of the manifest destiny ideology and constantly sought to increase the land controlled by the United States. His expansionist exploits were regarded in both positive and negative lights by Americans and foreigners alike, and many of these opinions were solidified in the minds of thousands when war was declared on Mexico in 1845 based on a claim President Polk could not prove. We may have entrusted President Polk with the highest position of leadership in our country, as well as the power to declare war which comes with the office, but does his ends justify his means, and was war truly the most favorable course of action for the United …show more content…

Polk took office in 1845. His youth and strong views proved difficult, and conflict filled his tenure as president. Seen both as a brilliant supporter of the manifest destiny ideology and as a incompetent president, the controversy of his presidency revolved around his expansionist dreams of conquering all land between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. These issues came to a head in 1845 after President Polk was able to use a false claim to convince Congress to declare war on Mexico. Polk could not prove his claim was completely true, but he was determined to expand America’s land and thus sought to forcibly take the land through war with Mexico after the country refused his offers to purchase the land. These extreme actions were within Polk’s power as president, which were entrusted to him by the people of the United States, but do his ends justify his unethical means? President Polk may have had the best interest of Americans in mind, but his warping of the truth has led me to view his actions, and consequently the entire Mexican-American War, as a pointless

Show More
Related

  • How Was The Mexican War An Expansion Of American Imperialism

    1818 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rodolfo Acuña and Norman A. Graebner take opposing standpoints on this topic. Acuña takes the standpoint that the Americans took advantage of the Mexican government, which was young and unstable at the time. He argued that the United States waged an unjust war solely for the acquisition of new lands. His excerpt from Occupied America: A History of Chicanos, 3rd Edition provided the basis for his argument. On the other hand, Graebner took the standpoint that President James Polk pushed a policy, enforced by a stronger nation, to force Mexico to sell New Mexico and California and recognize the annexation of Texas to the United States without starting a war. His argument was taken from his article “The Mexican War: A Study in Causation”. Both sides of the American Imperialism argument contain their own strengths. However, after the examination of the articles, Graebner proposes a more convincing

    Read More

  • Examples Of Mexican American Imperialism

    369 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the early and middle 1800s expansionism was a popular view in the United States. The Louisiana Purchase, the claim to Oregon, and the purchase of Florida, were all made to expand the borders and power of the United States. From the Rio Grande to the United States southern border was gained during the Mexican American war. This raises the question if the Mexican American war was an exercise in american imperialism, a war purely for land and power. Rodolfo Acuña believed that The Mexican American war was an exercise in american imperialism. When americans were invited to settle in Northern mexico they had to follow the laws set by the mexican government, no slaves were allowed and all settlers must convert to Catholicism. The american settlers openly rejected these laws and continued to settle in what is now present day Texas.

    Read More

  • James K. Polk Thesis

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    Polk supported the acquisition of Texas into the United States. It was a major part of his campaign.President Polk banned hard liquor and dancing in the White House.

    Read More

  • Grover Cleveland

    553 Words  | 2 Pages

    support the family of nine on his wages as a clerk. He earned only $4.00 a

    Read More

  • Summary: The Influence Of Polk

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    Depending on whom one reads, Polk comes across as either a nearly great President or as a man who missed great opportunities. Clearly, his impact was significant. Polk accomplished nearly everything that he said he wanted to accomplish as President and everything he had promised in his party's platform: acquisition of the Oregon Territory, California, and the Territory of New Mexico; the positive settlement of the Texas border dispute; lower tariff rates; the establishment of a new federal depository system; and the strengthening of the executive office. He masterfully kept open lines of communication with Congress, established the Department of the Interior, built up an administrative press, and conducted himself as a representative of the

    Read More

  • James Buchanan

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    On April 23, 1791, a great man was born; fifteenth president of the United States, James Buchanan.He was born near Mercersburg, Pennsylvania. His father, James Buchanan, and his mother Elizabeth Speer Buchanan, raised their son a Presbyterian. He grew up in a well to do home, being the eldest of eleven other siblings. His parents cared for them all in their mansion in Pennsylvania. They sent him to Dickinson College.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of President Polk

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although President Polk had made great leaps and bounds for the U.S, he also caused some problems that the people had different views on. He acquired all of the oregon territory from terminating a joint occupancy and treaty of Oregon with Great Britain. Had originally decided to share, but in the end, went for all of the land. Posed threat of war against Great Britain. This showed the people that he was greedy and unreliable since he went back on his word and didn’t follow through with the initial deal made. Polk also created more tension between the U.S and Mexico had been rising because of land disputes like where borders of texas were and land power. The United States also wanted to buy California from Mexico which added to the tension.

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion Of Manifest Destiny

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny was the starting point of the development of America in many different ways. Although the process was long and tortuous, Manifest Destiny was achieved. Polk’s determination to make it happen has benefitted the US in many ways. Whether it is economically, industrially, or socially, it is successful.

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny Dbq Analysis

    506 Words  | 2 Pages

    With every American war, there is always controversy. In 1846, the United States went to war with Mexico, a war known as the Mexican War. This seemingly insignificant war resulted in thousands of lives lost, both Mexican and American, and new lands for the United States. After Texas separated from Mexico, President James K. Polk—also known as Mr. Manifest Destiny— was quick to annex Texas and, soon, California. War erupted between Mexico and the United States after a battle on disputed territory in southern Texas. Between the idea of manifest destiny and the moral dilemma that the United States faced, controversy emerged and America was, once again, divided. However, despite the controversy, the United States was not justified in going

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Mexican War

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    America’s war with Mexico had its supporters and its critics. In 1821 Mexico was declared free from the mother country, Spain. Mexico was stretched from Guatemala to Oregon. It was equal to the size of the United States. It had emptiness near their northern lands. In order to have a bigger population was to welcome settlers from America. America declared war with Mexico because Texas applied to the United States of America for annexation, they were turned down because Congressmen thought it would anger Mexico. Then things changed and James K. Polk was the president and he annexed Texas for land and Mexico didn’t like that they took Texas. In 1846-1848, at Texas the U.S. and Mexico had a war. Critics ask does the U.S. have a right to go to war with Mexico. Manifest Destiny was annexation, Alamo, and envoy. The Mexican War

    Read More

  • Mexican American War Summary

    679 Words  | 2 Pages

    First and foremost, Lincoln is skeptical about Mexicans shedding American blood on American soil. He examined the president’s war message and states that he repeats multiple times throughout the message that the soil on which hostilities were commenced by Mexico was on American territory and claims that Polk is lying to people, so the war can initiate. Furthermore, he argues that the Rio Grande had nothing to do with the present boundary between Mexico and the United States. Moreover, he discusses that the Republic of Texas has not always claimed the Rio Grande as their western boundary and the wrongdoing of Polk’s claim about Santa Anna’s treaty with Texas recognizing Rio Grande as their western boundary. Lincoln argues that it is not a treaty

    Read More

  • Mexican War Justified

    464 Words  | 1 Pages

    Is manifest destiny enough to rightfully go to war? Mexico wanted to keep Texas as there own, but Texas was annexed by the United States. Mexico and the U.S. fought over disputed territory. Did the U.S. have good reasons to go to war with Mexico? The United States were not justified in going to war with Mexico because they didn't need a war, Polk provoked it, and America was seen as robbing Mexico's land.

    Read More

  • The Mexican-American War: Was Manifest Destiny Justified?

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Mexican-American war took place from 1846 to 1848. The war was fought between the United States and Mexico over the issue of disputed land, as well as past conflict. Even though heavily supported by the American people at the time, the reasoning behind the war as well as its justification is often questioned. Many people believe that Manifest Destiny was not an adequate excuse for the taking of over 500,000 square miles of land from the Mexican people. Additionally, the taking of Mexico’s lands was by no means justified by the self-proclaimed, entitled ideology of the American people

    Read More

  • James A. Garfield

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    father died in 1833, when Garfield was only two years old and so his mother

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny Thesis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    Polk further than his belief in Manifest Destiny to such a point that he had a dispute with Mexico that causes the US to gain Texas, California, New Mexico, Arizona and parts of Nevada. Keep in mind that he felt this was just because of the manifest destiny and that this land was rightfully owned by the United States of America. Furthermore, Andrew Jackson's land policy said that the expansion of the US power into Latin America is logical and necessary according to Manifest Destiny. His land policies even went as far as saying that that Latin America should be a part of the US anyway. This caused many disagreements between the US and Mexico, and even grounds for a war. They didn't like the idea of losing their land because of a privilege the US that they had and it was worth fighting

    Read More

More about James K. Polk Dbq

Open Document