Issues with Gun Control

The fight to ban gun control is going to be a difficult one. Gun control laws just take guns away from law-abiding citizens. There are many reasons why people want to own a gun. Don’t keep letting the government keep making it harder for us to won a gun, everyone is a lot safer when they own a gun and follow the laws. The second amendment clearly states “the right to bear arms”, don’t let the government try to change that.

They should do background checks for any mental illnesses, past criminal activity including petty crime, and whether or not they contribute to the community. Government should not be able to dictate that a normal law abiding citizen who owns a gun for personal protection of home and property is responsible for all of the crime. What the law makers do not understand is that criminals are going to get guns no matter what. It does not matter how strict the laws are. They could ban gun sales all together and it would not stop criminals from obtaining guns.

If we had no guns what's to stop people with a knife or a pipe trying to rob or even kill us? america has a right to own guns and as loyal americans we s... ... middle of paper ... ...nseless people of america defend themselves against a robbery or something else. the answer is that they wouldn't. concealed handguns at least let you have the power to stop and assault directed toward you. If we had no guns we as americans wouldn't be able to protect ourselves against robbers of other things.There are elected officials that are actively engaging in the development of measures to destroy our Constitutional right to bear arms as per the 2nd amendment.

The belief that enforcing stricter gun laws on those who use guns for good(gun owners who protect themselves, their families, and potentially prevent crimes) will keep guns off the streets(from those who buy guns off the black market rather than a gun store – obviously requiring no permit, no background check, etc) is very foolish. If this method were actually effective, then illegal drugs would not be an issue. Vilifying gun owners by imposing gun restrictions make it tougher for registered, law abiding gun owners from purchasing firearms and does nearly nothing to prevent real criminals from acquiring them. Is gun control the solution to deterring heinous acts and creating less crime? Gun control is legislation that is specifically aimed at imposing measures to make it harder for an individual to acquire a firearm.

Law won 't work either because we will have to keep coming up with more solutions that won 't solve the problem the world has with guns.One reason, gun control will not work because it will not stop people mainly criminals from obtaining guns. Guns are not the leading cause of death and it not the only thing that kills. Under the constitution, a citizen has the "Right to bear arms", which was set forth as means for one to protect themselves and their

True, gun control can lessen the amount of guns on the streets, but it also takes the guns out of the hands of responsible owners, not the criminals. Illegally purchased firearms can hardly be regulated and these are the guns that are used by the people doing most of the killing. By inserting a block on legal purchases, the government is refusing the common citizen the ability to protect themselves. It seems such a disgrace that one would have to die because the government wouldn 't let them have a gun. The emphasis of gun control should be placed on educating gun safety to those who haven 't had any experience and licensing those wanting to use their firearms.

Others include limitation on what types of armaments can be purchased, types of ammo, ET cetra. A problem with universal background checks could deny a law-abiding citizen from acquiring a firearm based on other information not relating to criminal activity (religion/political views/ etc.) This seems like something that wouldn’t happen but nonetheless is still a threat and must be treated as such. Having a public registry of gun owners is not wise either because it makes it easier for weapon confiscation and weapon thefts. (Fields, 2011) we have seen this occur twice in the state of New

Furthermore, people wouldn’t have to worry about the risk of being attacked if they were given the absolute right to protect themselves, as supported by recent evidence. Therefore, abolishing laws that restrict that right makes perfect sense. On top of this, laws that restrict our right to bear arms creates the potential risk of a despotic governments all over the nation, and when this occurs, a peoples’ rebellion will not be able to be carried out. In the end, taking the firearms away from the public has been putting this nation into a downwards spiral.

Mental health is huge problem in the United States, especially when it allows certain individuals to have access to firearms. Politicians should aim to work more on keeping guns out of the hands of those who seek to harm others, not the law abiding citizens. But this is no easy task. In the CNN article, The real gun problem is mental health, not the NRA, the author, Mel Robbins, points how the mental health problem is to blame , not the gun. Robbins states "Next time there 's a mass shooting, don 't jump to blame the National Rifle Association and lax gun laws.

Banning more and more guns may reduce gun violence, but it will not eliminate guns from society and will only lead to more and bigger problems. While continuing to take more freedom away from the Ame... ... middle of paper ... ...Banning guns will not solve the crime problem it will only change the method. If guns are not available then another weapon will be used or an older gun. Simple laws will not stop a person who is determined to cause someone harm. This is why people should be allowed to own and carry guns.