Issues of Gay Marriage

991 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should gay marriage be legal

In the United States, the denial of the right to permit gay marriage has become a social turbulence regarding the federal government. As the gay community expands, the issue expands. There is an effort by many states to enact laws on this issue. Some cities around the country are also writing their own laws. This is a decision that should be made by the person who has to live with his or her spouse, not the person’s nation. This nation declares equality, liberty and justice for all. A government should not be able to prohibit any one person from declaring his or her love for someone else. Allowing the government to intervene in gay marriage represents class discrimination, denies marriage benefits, and rejects civil rights.
One of the most widely known acts of discrimination would be the Loving vs. Virginia case. This case involves an interracial marriage, which was against the law in 1967. The case relates to discrimination in gay marriage because the case struck a nerve with people who believe that discrimination should not be a factor in having a legal marriage. The people involved in the case, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving, were discriminated against because of their race and were denied the right to marry in certain states. While being denied to marry in Virginia, they married in the District of Columbia. A couple weeks after returning to Virginia and purchasing a home the couple were charged for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage. The couple did not marry in Virginia, but because they were living in Virginia and they were married and not of the same race, it was a problem. They were threatened to be thrown in jail for a year or forced to leave the state immediately. If they wanted to be married they had to ...

... middle of paper ...

...on may choose to marry. The bottom line is, all people deserve their legal rights no matter what their sexual preference is and no one person should take that away from them.
The right to choose whom to marry should not be denied by the government. Gays being denied rights to marry is similar to the Loving vs. Virginia case. The Loving vs. Virginia case was one popular discriminating case which denied rights because of the person’s preference of whom they wanted to marry. Without being married many are also denied marriage benefits that may include buying a home. Gays should have the ability to have all the civil rights as any other person. They should not be judged and discriminated against because of the person they choose to marry. It is not the choice of the government, but the right and choice of the people. Gay marriage should be legal in the United States.

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Gay Rights

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the economic support, the adoption rates rising, and the equality same-sex couples deserve, gay marriage deserves to be legalized throughout the nation and the world. Rejecting the right of marriage to these couples hurts them and the way they are able to live their lives. Everyone deserves marriage and life equality despite the person they love because we have equality rights based on us as an individual, not on who we decide to love.

    Read More

  • Miscegenation Case Analysis

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Loving v. Virginia, 388 US 1 (1967) is the landmark ruling that nullified anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. In June 1958, Mildred Loving, a black female, married Richard Loving, a white male, in Washington, DC. The couple traveled to Central Point, Virginia and their home was raided by the local police. The police charged the Loving’s of interracial marriage, a felony charge under Section 20-58 of the Virginia Code which prohibited interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the couple pled guilty and received a suspended sentence with the agreement that they would Virginia and not return for 25 years. In November 6, 1963, the couple filed a motion in the state court to vacate the original judgment on the grounds it violated the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Stanford Case Summary

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dred Scott v. Sanford is notoriously famous for its pro-slavery verdict which demonstrates the white superiority and racial attitude the Supreme Court had while making the decision. This case was only the first in setting the precedence of the social hardships African Americans had to go through in order to gain civil and human

    Read More

  • Colson's Article: The Constitutional Right Of Gay Marriage

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitutional right of gay marriage is a hot topic for debate in the United States. Currently, 37 states have legal gay marriage, while 13 states have banned gay marriage. The two essays, "What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Katha Pollitt and "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson provide a compare and contrast view of why gay marriage should be legal or not. Pollitt argues that gay marriage is a constitutional human right and that it should be legal, while Colson believes that gay marriage is sacrilegious act that should not be legal in the United States and that “it provides a backdrop for broken families and increases crime rates” (Colson, pg535). Both authors provide examples to support their thesis. Katha Pollitt provides more relevant data to support that gay marriage is a constitutional right and should be enacted as law in our entire country, she has a true libertarian mindset.

    Read More

  • Racial Challenges African Americans Faced Throughout History

    1752 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...of religion, the freedom to assemble and civil rights such as the right to be free from discrimination such as gender, race, religion, and sexual orientation. Throughout history, African Americans have endured discrimination, segregation, and racism and have progressively gained rights and freedoms by pushing civil rights movement across America. This paper addressed several African American racial events that took place in our nation’s history. These events were pivotal and ultimately led to the establishment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Civil Rights Act paved the way for future legislation that was not limited to African American civil rights and is considered a landmark piece of legislation that ending racism, segregation and discrimination throughout the United States.

    Read More

  • Loving V Virginia Essay

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court and Civil Rights

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court was known for some of the most notorious decisions made in history, many in which included the cases, Marbury v. Madison, Scott v. Sandford, and United States v. Cruikshank. Despite these cases, the court did turn around and change their perspective and helped minorities achieve their civil rights. In 1915, the case of Guinn and Beal v. United States helped African Americans reassure their right to vote. In this case the Supreme Court considered the grandfather clause to be unconstitutional. The grandfather clause was a mechanism t...

    Read More

  • How Does Gay Marriage Weaken The Concept Of Marriage?

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Homosexuals can marry just like any other person, with the same rights and obligations as heterosexuals. If a homosexual complains of discrimination because he or she can't marry someone of the same sex is as if a polygamous complains of discrimination because you can't marry several women, or a pedophile with a child. There is no discrimination with none of these ones. Everyone is equal to the la...

    Read More

  • Loving v. Virginia

    1477 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea of slavery gave some, not all, Caucasian Americans the idea that they were better than the blacks who worked for them. Mind sets like these set the ball in motion for anti-miscegenation laws. 41out of our 50 states had these laws at one time, leaving only 9 states without ever having an anti-miscegenation law. These states being: Alaska, Hawaii, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and New Jersey. 15 of these states abolished these laws only after the Loving V. Virginia case which was ruled on the 12th of June, 1967. That day, this couple got what they had wanted more than anything. They’re home back and their love to be a...

    Read More

  • Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Mr. and Mrs. Loving were residents of the small town of Central point, Virginia. They were family friends who had dated each other since he was seventeen and she a teenager. When they learned that marriage was illegal for them in Virginia, they simply drove over the Washington, D.C. for the ceremony. They returned to Virginia and were arrested the following month for violating the anti-miscegenation statute, which was declared in the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. Commonwealth’s Attorney Bernard Mahon obtained the warrant for Richard Loving and “Mildred Jeter”. Mildred’s maiden name was on the warrant because in Virginia a marriage between a white and black was considered void. In October 1958, the indictments of Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter were bought before the court and on January 6, 1959, Richard and Mildred pled not guilty to the charges. Changing their pleas to guilty and waiving their right to a jury trial due to fear and optimism for a favorable punishment, the Lovings took the plea bargain. The Circuit Court judge that was presiding over the case, Judge Leon M. Bazile, did not see favor on them and sentenced them to one year in jail. Yet, at the same time in agreement with the plea bargain, Judge Bazile suspended the sentence for 25 years provided that the Lovings would leave the state of Virginia immediately and not return together for the whole period. There was a catch, for when the 25 year period ends they would still face the prosecution of the court if they ever returned. He concluded his decision with this quote:

    Read More

  • Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay

    1374 Words  | 3 Pages

    As an American citizen, a person should be entitled to marry whoever they choose, regardless of gender or sexual preference. Gay marriage is something that some people consider to be taboo while other people are very supportive of it; I am one of the latter. The ability to marry someone is a basic human right and it should not be taken away from someone because they love a person of the same gender. One of the main reasons that gay marriage is illegal in the United States is because of what the Bible says about it, regardless of the fact that the first Amendment of the US Constitution says that there is to be a separation between church and state. Approximately three point eight percent of the United States population is made up of people

    Read More

  • Morality of Same Sex Marriage

    330 Words  | 1 Pages

    Furthermore, the word "equal" in section 1 of the 14th amendment implies that everyone should have the right to get married no matter what his or her sexual preference. Marriage is the legal and public documentation of the love and trust two people share for each other. This means that anyone should be able to marry whomever he or she wishes.

    Read More

  • Gay Marriage Should be Legal

    2010 Words  | 5 Pages

    On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Should gay marriages be legal? Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. Thirty-six states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet a few states have passed laws that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Several other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States' homosexual community in an awkward position. There are some people who think that gay people have no rights and should never be allowed to marry, and others believe that gay people should enjoy the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals. I think that the United States should allow same-sex couples to marry just like heterosexual couples.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage

    681 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are several reasons why homosexuals feel strongly about wanting to be legally married, why wouldn't there be? One reason that is probably the most commonly heard is, they want to legally show their love for each other by having a marriage license. Gay people want the right to marry like anybody else, and for the same reasons too. They are in love and want to be with this person for the rest of their lives. Even though it is possible to do this without being married, they want to be able to honor their relationship with their partner publicly. There should be absolutely no reason for two people not to be able to marry despite their sexuality. If a man and woman get to get married because they love each other, why can't a man and a man marry each other? What about a woman and a woman? They love each other too, isn't that a valid reason to get married? Isn't it also a valid reason to let them?

    Read More

More about Issues of Gay Marriage

Open Document