Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essay on religious violence 1000 words
religious hate crimes essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essay on religious violence 1000 words
In June 2016, an LGBT night club in Orlando, Florida was brutally attacked by armed gunman. On that night, forty nine club-goers were devastatingly shot and murdered. According to CNN, authorities claimed it was the nation’s worst terror attack since 9/11. Not only was this a deeply devastating act of hate, but also possibly an act of religious conflict. It has been reported that the shooter was of Islamic faith, and has formerly pledged his allegiance to ISIS. In his religion, being gay is a punishable sin. There is extreme prejudice in muslim culture against the LGBT community. However, regardless of prejudice, Islam is a religion of peace.
This man’s horribly skewed view of his peaceful religion showed the very first of Kimball’s five warning
…show more content…
I was surprised to find it pretty unbiased and informative for both sides of his argument. His first argument is yes, religion can definitely be the root of evil intentions. A prime example is the Orlando shooting mentioned above, Al-Qaida, countless violent attacks on abortion clinics, etc. I feel I hardly need to go into detail because these instances shouldn’t come as a shock. These are acts of terror stemming from religious conflict, and they happen frequently. These instances are all the proof Kimball needs to argue that religion can become evil.
The first of his five warning signs, as mentioned earlier, is absolute truth claims. This sign was extremely obvious in the first article mentioned. It’s easy to lose sight of remembering that the language of God and his teachings are symbolic. They are not to be taken literally. According to Kimball, when people don’t interpret the word of God by taking each
teaching as an absolute truth, that is the first warning sign of a religion becoming evil. Kimball’s second sign is blind obedience. His argument for this is when a religion
…show more content…
I found this refreshing. He reiterates that all religions advocate peace, and I think we should apply that to our world and use religion as a tool to unite us. Religion has definitely had a horrible reputation, but it should be used as a tool for open dialogue and empowerment. As Kimball states, it can be radical by causing holy wars, forming cults based off absolute truth claims followed by blind obedience by its followers, etc. Religion causes conflict based on entirely different perspectives. But Kimball’s chapter on inclusiveness was also refreshing to me. He points out that religion may at times
Religion, by far, is one of the most dominant forces the human race has ever seen. It has influenced and continues to influence billions of people all over the world. It has driven some of the most beneficial cooperative humanitarian efforts and some of the most heinous acts of violence anybody can perpetuate on another human being. In his book, When Religion Becomes Evil, Dr. Charles Kimball explores the causes and slippery slopes that lead to these kinds of atrocious behaviors. Many of his points were incredibly well thought out and valid, but one repetitive phrase that Dr. Kimball used caught my attention: “authentic religion.” This one phrase contains so many troublesome presuppositions that it is impossible not to question.
In today’s culture, the idea of there is perfect and divine designer that made the earth and everything that entails with it, really pushes people away. Not only has this idea been conflicted about in today’s culture. It has been especially trivial in past decades, an example of this is seen by H.J. McCloskey. McCloskey wrote an article about it called “On Being an Atheist”, which attempts to defeat the notion that there is a God. McCloskey first addresses the reader of the article and says these arguments he is about to address are only “proofs”, which should not be trusted by any theist. He then goes and unpacks the two arguments that he believes can actually be addressed, the cosmological and teleological argument. McCloskey also addresses the problem of evil, free will, and why atheism is more comforting than theism.
Critical Analysis: Evil as evidence for Christianity? Evil as Evidence for Christianity is Gregory E. Ganssle’s attempt to logically explain and disprove the claim that evil points toward there being no God. Ganssle claims exactly the opposite, that evil by definition points toward the existence of God with much more substantial evidence than the latter. Ganssle states that there are “three ways in which our thoughts about evil represent facts that point to God”.
Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.
One of the things he writes is that the person doesn’t know that they are going into a cult. “The first rule of recruitment, […] is that...
Many religious followers today would classify themselves of “Christian” theology and adherence. If there was a phenomenon that diminished Christian teachings to inaccuracy and abolished its presence from civilization there would be several alternative religions to consider. Of the other four major religions that we have covered this semester it would be a close race to decide which belief system would be the best substitute to prior knowledge taught about Christianity. It would be difficult to forget years of information that Jesus is the Son of God and choosing another religion would have to have some representation of Christianity. The decision has to compare the pros and cons of each alternative between Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and Islam. Doing so provides a template that proves there would be no definitive winner between the four. If another religion had to be chosen besides Christianity it would be a close decision but Islam would edge out the others slightly.
However, it is widely known that one of the major practices in Buddhism is peace. This shows how astray extremists can go from the ideals that are usually followed as the norm. This is also evident with all of the Islamic terrorists attacks. Similar to the Right Action of Buddhism, Islam also teaches that killing is forbidden, but there are extremists that are using religion as a justification for killing others. This small percentage of extremists are sometimes seen as a representation of Islam, but obviously that is not the case. In both religions, a majority of people practice the idea of peace. After reading the Eightfold Path, I realized that these extremists are going against what their religion teaches. I remember talking to a friend about the events that were occurring in Myanmar and he explained how Buddhism is not a religion, and so all Buddhists will go to hell because of what they are doing to Muslims. I was so confused as to why he assumed Buddhism was to be blamed for the outrageous acts that were being committed. The Eightfold Path reading helped me understand Buddhism better. I explained to my friend that the religion is in fact peaceful and that these acts were caused by a group of people who are completely straying from the ideas of Buddhism. He soon realized what he was saying was wrong and
A functioning society seeks to work together in harmony to maintain a state of balance and social equilibrium for the whole. There are thousands of different types of religions in the world. So how do they maintain this ability to function and to keep a society functioning. Not all religions are as harmonious. Berger states there is a crisis of credibility a loss of religious legitimacy and plausibility. Pluralism threatens to rip apart a
Christianity is a religion, but the “Moonies" is a cult in regards to such criteria. Based off the technicalities represented by Eliyahu Federman, a religion can become a cult, but a cult is not a religion. Furthermore, David Adler describes how mistreatment of people through physical, verbal, and mental abuse can turn a set of beliefs into an out of control cult quickly. Adler continues to show how Christianity is different from cults, most specifically Sun Myung Moon, in how Christian beliefs do not go against the free will of all people. The blurred line between the two can be seen to all in a crispy and clear light. Now, many may see their mistakes in confusing the two and see how the term cult can offend a numerous amount of
The first step toward Liberalism consists of the respect of human rights. Although the declaration of human rights does not explicitly express gay’s rights, its core objective is to protect individuals rights to live free and away from physical harm regardless from their sex, origin, race or gender. Therefore, violence against any individual is a disrespect of human rights that cannot be warranted by any religious or cultural assertion. Unfortunately, physical abuses against LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) are still practiced in Lebanon leaving the victims with long lasting physical and psychological damages. Kotecha (2013), in her article “Lebanon’s gay-friendly reputation challenged by abuses”, stated that in 2012, the police broke into a Beirut cinema and detained more than 30 individuals supposed to be homosexuals. These individuals were exposed to physical abuses in terms of anal inspection in order to reveal whether they have been exposed to any unnatural sexual intercourse. The reporter continues in an interview with one t...
Myers mentioned in his article that this generation of young discouraged, angry men feels abandoned with the today’s norms. Male movie stars and athletes have further influenced the masculine norms. In males perspective, liking a feminine color, doing feminine actions, listening to specified girl music is considered to be less manly. These have greatly affected the likes and dislikes of many men. The entertainment industry has created a big gap between what is masculine or feminine. This has caused a big separation and it's getting worse. Male are taught to be man of the house, strong, and powerful, but sometimes they’re belittled by society that they can’t do certain things and all the power is
J.D. Salinger’s most famous novel The Catcher in the Rye features a sixteen-year-old boy named Holden who is being kicked out of yet another prep school. Throughout the novel, Holden expresses his masculinity in several different ways. One of the most striking and what I believe makes the book so popular is his perpetuation of toxic masculinity. Toxic masculinity in a nutshell definition is types of masculinity that are harmful to both men and women. Toxic masculinity is a direct result of the social constructs upheld by a patriarchal society. Holden’s expression of toxic masculinity happens consistently throughout the novel but I am only going to focus on two specific instances of his behavior. The first is before he is supposed to meet with the prostitute, and the second is when he meets with Phoebe and reflects about his friend committing suicide being his favorite thing. The aforementioned instances exemplify Holden’s obsession and perpetuation of toxic masculinity.
The controversy surrounding new religious movements seems to be foremost concerned with whether or not the members of these religions come of their own freewill or if they convert as a necessary and inevitable response to advanced coercion, or “brainwashing” techniques employed by the cult leaders.
In the essay, “Is Religion Bad or Good?” John Stahl reveals his thoughts on how religion is not necessarily good even though it is supposed to be. He points out five different religions including Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, and Quaker as he gathers his opinion on each. Stahl lets it be known that no religion is really bad, yet they all have their own errors. He stops to say that in his opinion, “both Jews and Moslems should evolve their religious beliefs,” and that his reasons for this is that it is a solution to the warfare in the Middle East. He observes that the “perfect” religion consists of a single God for all, but that it leads to peace, joy, and love at the middle. Stahl, in the end, observes, “It really doesn’t matter whether it is your shoes or your hat that you take off (or put on) when you go to commune with God,” which I find extremely powerful. Basically what he is stating here is that God does not look for flaws on that outside, does not judge, and that all a God needs is you to know it is there and for you to believe it.
Smith describes the concept of religion as “recent, Western-and-Islamic, and unstable” (Ward, 2008:10) and his definition of the term religion is “faith in a transcendent reality” (Ward, 2008:11). It is important to understand