In their article, they draw arguments from data retrieved from the FBI, which clearly illustrates the correlation between executions and resultant murder trends from 1979 to 2004. Their scientific analysis unmistakably reveals that each capital punishment is equivalent to a reduction of 71 murders in the same year. This analysis suggests that capital punishment is of great value to the society since it significantly reduces homicide cases. Different scholars have written various articles that support this perspective. For instance, Mocan and Gittings (2003) take time to investigate this theory by including the effects of commutation, prison deaths, and acquittals on the rate of crime.
Does anyone have a right to take someone’s life? Does the death penalty work as a deterrent for violent crimes? If the death penalty becomes illegal, what punishment would be appropriate for criminals who committed a crime against humanity? Death penalty has always been a controversial topic. There have always been many questions surrounding this issue and since it clearly has both positive and negative effects, the gap between supporters and oppositions has been difficult to narrow.
Capital Punishment is Necessary in Society For years capital punishment has been a source of heated debate in the United States. The tension surrounding this issue is most certainly understandable. Most of all, there is the question of morality. The cold factor of cost is another issue that has continued to fuel the fire of this debate. In order to effectively evaluate whether or not the death penalty is applicable, we must first determine a few of the more important aspects of the issue.
These costs are not the result of careless appeals but instead the result of constitutionally mandated safeguards (www.deathpenalty.org). Even with the careless appeals and mandated safeguards were having to take a closer look into convicted felons’ cases and by doing so we have saved a large number of wrongfully convicted people. Capital punishment, the death penalty, is a highly controversial method used in punishing people who kill another human being. It has raised difficult moral, practical, and legal issues. The debate over capital punishment continues to be pursed in both courts and the political arena (Capital Punishment, pg.3).
Furthermore, Muhlhausen uses strong logos to prove the death penalty can actually deter homicides. He uses studies by Drexel University economist Bijou Yang and Richard Stockton College psychologist David Lester which found a “deterrent effect” on the number of murders when the death penalty is used (2). The length of this study, from 1978 to 2005 helps to
Supporters also argue that the death penalty is a necessary deterrent to saving innocent lives (Pro-Death Penalty, 2014). Based on my research of this issue I tend to agree with the death penalty advocates and believe that execution is the appropriate sentence and punishment for capital offenses. There are six main rationales for abolishing the practice of capital punishment that are commonly heard. One reason is that capital punishment does not deter crime. Anti-death penalty advocates contend that scientific studies consistently fail to demonstrate that executions discourage people from committing crime (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
By putting the criminals to death, the people all around us are protected from future crimes. Although it is a logical reason, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty decreases crimes (ACLU, 2007). States that practice the death penalty do not lower crime rates compared to states which have only lifetime imprisonment as the highest form of punishment. Both punishments show the same results as thoroughly researched by the social science research in America. (ACLU, 2007) Crimes interfere with the peace and order of society (Budziszewski, 2004).
There are enough places still apply it so that it is very controversial topic all over the world. There is long history and many issues about the subject which make it difficult to decide what is the correct one. This essay will discuss the historical, social and moral sides of the issue capital punishment. From history, it will show the trends and process to how things are today. Then the current social arguments and problems with the death penalty.
The essay states some of the research that has been conducted with the intention of proving that capital punishment can deter crimes. This paper points out the effects and imposition of capital punishments on criminal activities. The paper finally makes a conclusion on the issue of capital punishment as deterrence. Introduction Many people assume that punishment by death will prevent crime, but if that was true then crimes would not have been committed in the dread that the offenders will be prosecuted and put to death. History and behavior of man has revealed that normal human instinct does not prevent people from committing crimes because if it did capital punishment would never have to be used.
The death penalty has been an ongoing debate for many years. Each side of the issue presents valid arguments to explain why someone should be either for or against the subject. One side of the argument says deterrence, the other side says there’s a likelihood of putting to death an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder itself. Crime is an unmistakable part of our society, and it is safe to say that everyone would concur that something must be done about it. The majority of people know the risk of crime to their lives, but the subject lies in the techniques and actions in which it should be dealt with.