Gender roles and stereotypes actively alter the ways in which humans both interact in society as well as perceive oneself as an individual. These stereotypes created among genders has been a focal point in understanding societal behavior and achievement. In particular, the mathematical skill level between male and females has become a widening spectrum for researchers to interpret and predict; while there is an apparent difference in skill level, the causes for this gap between male and female mathematical performance is debated by researchers in the scientific psychology field.
Current data shows that girls have reached parity with boys in mathematics grades 2 through 11. Research also shows that males and females are similar in most but not all psychological areas (Hyde, 2014). It begs the question as to why after all this proof women are still portrayed as inferior to men in many areas in life, including math. Society fuels this bogus stereotype and its negative effects. Steele (2003) writes that if the cure for cancer is forming in the mind of one of our daughters, it is less likely to become a reality than if it is forming in the mind of one of our sons. Until this changes, everybody loses (Sadker & Sadker, 1994, p. 14).
Especially, women are very serious hiring discrimination in mathematic fields. They are very less selected for the new position. Employers are tendency unfair to hire women for several reasons: first, they might think women have fewer job skills than men and women are less qualified to perform nontraditional jobs and can’t handle higher-paid positions. The employers usually favored men, even if women have the same background, education, and job experience. The three nation’s top business schools examined why women make a small portion of studying or working in math and science field. The research found the discrimination even though the same credential (Alan par. 2). Male applicants are twice likely to be by hire the company over the female applicant within the math field and persist the discrimination after the applicant reported how they are done on the math task. When women give a full information for past math performance, discrimination rate fell by nine percentage points, but discrimination is still remain in the workplace. Alan argues that “The gender gap in hiring decisions is due to a systematic underestimation of the performance of women compared to men (par.
There is no structural reason that there should be a difference in the number entering certain university classes, nor as mentioned earlier, is there more than a minor difference in performance of math (Hyde, Fennema & Lamon 1990) allowing both women and men to enter science and math related university studies.
Ever since the beginning of time women have been fighting to gain attention in the mathematical arena. For decades they were seen as persona non grata but hard work and perseverance has led to tremendous breakthroughs as there are instances where females are either equally performing or even out performing their male counterparts in math-related disciplines. Ceci, et al in “Women's Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations” (2009) posits that male and female college mathematics students receive similar grades and ever since 1996 there has been an increase in the percentage of females receiving bachelors and doctorates in STEM (Science, Technology and Mathematics) fields (221). As Connie McNelly and Sorina Vlaicu in “Exploring Institutional Hiring Trends of Women in the U.S. STEM Professoriate” (2010) puts it, there is proof to suggest that despite the large amount of females earning degrees and doctorates in math-related fields, they are not entering the science and math workforce at the same rate (786). Why then does a gender gap exist in math-related careers? There is a general consensus that a gender disparity exists within math-related fields, however, there are several arguments which seek to explain this phenomenon.
Cole wants her readers to understand that everyone should have the right to learn this magnificent tool. K.C. Cole believes women did not have the same opportunities as men on the subject that they want to pursue in. She didn 't realize what an odd creature a woman interested in physics was until she saw a University’s conference, out of several hundred young students of physics and engineering in the room, less than a handful were women. This is especially true in the current society, where some occupation are considered women only, and some are men only. As said in her essay, “women are simply made to feel out of place in science. Her conclusion was supported by a Ford Foundation study by Lynn H. Fox on the problems of women in mathematics. When students were asked to choose among six reasons accounting for girls ' lack of interest in math, the girls rated this statement second - Men do not want girls in the mathematical occupations.” The author K.C. Cole uses historical allusion from another person to help support her idea of the exclusion of women in the science field. As we all can imagine, this did not only happen to K.C Cole. As she described in her essay, some of her friends and people she knows about also face challenges on this field, she remembers that, “A friend of mine remembers winning a Bronx Wide mathematics competition in the second grade. Her friends both boys and girls warned her that
Men and woman are faced educational discrepancies, both author Robert B Smith and Mary Ann Baeinnger outline this in their work. Women are leading educationally, and men are slowly trailing behind, this is agreed among both authors. Smith and Baeinnger, both establish that there is a problem but it the authors differ in establishing what the focal problem is. Smith makes the point that men are the main issue, however Baeinnger’s establishes that while women have a track record of academic success in college they are not offered the success post college they deserve. This is a cause of gender role, and the idea that one sex is guaranteed access while the other had to work harder to gain it(Baeinnger 2014 p.256).
Women graduates from the 16 Wisconsin Technical College Districts in 2003 made up 12,589 (65%) of 19,358 graduates as compared to 6,745 (35%) men. The percentage of women graduates from the WTCS has increased significantly since the 1980s but has been more than 50% for at least the last 20 years. The percentage of women graduates nationally from American two and four colleges and universities is increasing significantly each year and will eventually exceed or be on a par with men graduates from higher education nationally in “most” academic and professional majors, if they do not already exceed men in 2004.
51 percent of the United States is female but only 34.4 percent of doctors are women. While 90.4 percent of nurses are female (“Women in Medicine”; “Male Nurses Becoming”), the women who do become doctors earn an astounding 25 percent less than their male counterparts (Groves). These staggering figures are only a single piece in the larger overall lack of women in STEM, or science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, which has remained prevalent since the beginning of these fields. Although women are underrepresented in these STEM fields, this is not due to ineptitude, but instead it is a result of the force of societal stereotypes coupled with their wider range of abilities. The recent increase in women’s association with STEM seems promising, however, it is not actually due to decreasing cultural stereotypes.
Girls are seen as caring, nurturing, quiet, and helpful. They place other’s needs above their own. Girls get ahead by hard work, not by being naturally gifted. Boys are seen as lazy, but girls are seen as not capable. In class, teacher will call on boys more than they call on girls. Boys are seen as better at math and science; while girls are better at reading and art. This bias is still at work even out of the classroom. There are more males employed at computer firms than women. The ratio of male to female workers in STEM fields is 3-1. In college, more women major in the humanities than in the sciences. In education, women are often seen as lesser than; even though 65% of all college degrees are earned by women. Women are still often seen as needing to be more decorative than intellectual, as represented by the Barbie who included the phrase, “Math is hard!” and the shirt that JC Penneys sold that said, “I’m too pretty to do homework, so my brother has to do it for me.” While there was a backlash on both items, it points out that there is a great deal of work to do on the educational gender bias to be