Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

755 Words2 Pages

Analysis of “Is Google Making Us Stupid’ by Nicholas Carr
In Nicholas Carr’s article ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid?’, the author speaks about one of the biggest influences on our society in the present day. Technology controls everything we do, from educational purposes to online shopping, and now even grocery shopping, technology has advanced us into a whole new world. Internet has become the primary source of information for people. Carr’s main focus in the article is of the more negative effects of technology and how it affects us. He shares his problem with his lack of focus when reading now, he believes constant online influence affects our abilities to read books and other long pieces.
The author uses an array of statement to create the …show more content…

Logos is the appeal to logic or reason, which can be developed by using appropriate language and citing facts. He also makes a strong appeal to ethos, which is the means to convince an audience of the author’s credibility. Carr is able to do this by using appropriate language for his topic as well as his audience. He uses correct grammar and keeps his opinion as unbiased as possible throughout the essay. He is able to keep it unbiased by using quotes from others with similar and different opinions in comparison to his. Although not as strong as the two former, Carr also appeals to pathos through having such a relevant topic. Pathos is the ability to invoke sympathy from an audience through ton, examples, and language. Nowadays almost everyone owns a smartphone or tablet, so by having a topic focused on the advancements of technology and leaving book learning behind, it allows for readers to connect more with the article than they may have with a less relevant topic.
The vocabulary throughout this essay is simple and easy for most to understand. The tone of the article remains consistent throughout the essay and allows for readers to stay engaged and committed to reading the article. The arguments and examples were relevant to the context and audience. By using examples such as google and medical journals, it allowed for stronger credibility. The author also uses logical fallacies such as “begging

Open Document