Is Google Making USupid Analysis

1036 Words3 Pages

“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
There’s a lot of controversy about the internet transforming and changing our brains drastically, but not in a proper way. Is Google making us stupid? Many people believe this to be true, and it has been proven time and time again. This article was written in July and August of 2008 by Nicholas Carr, and he argues the statement that over many years, reading and writing has rehabilitated a lot because everything used to be written on paper and people’s focus was improved while reading on paper, but now everyone writes articles online, and it is more difficult to focus while reading, because there are many sites to look at and read, so many people just skip from article to article without ever thoroughly evaluating …show more content…

Carr says, “The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” When the author says this, the reader can tell how he feels and he is not pleased about the issue. Carr also explains how every time he reads, it seems he is constantly having to drag his brain back to the text all the time, because he cannot stay fixated on the internet, due to so many distractions. Then, Carr moves into using logical appeals to prove that the argument is true, and there have been studies to prove that the internet can be a corrupt way of researching and reading, because people bounce around from site to site too much, and this has become a big concern over the years. At the beginning, Carr lays the foundation of the argument by explaining how some people have recently been experiencing a weird modification in their thought process and how their minds are changing and dragging down and he is wondering why this is happening. He continues by explaining that he knows the problem and goes on to explain that this has been happening since the internet has become better-quality, and it has slowly over time pulled us away from …show more content…

For example, when the author explains how reading used to be a natural ability, but now it is hard and distracting, and he also experiences always having to drag his brain back to the text. All of these are things he has experienced and gives his credit to be trusted on the issue. Also, Carr explains, “I think I know what’s going on. For more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet” (Carr). In this explanation he begins to tell the reader roughly what he has personally noticed which is a good sign because we get his point of view on the argument about google and the internet in general, distracting us and transforming our brains to not let us concentrate as well as we used to be able to, and this establishes his credibility very well. The author had a pronounced way of explaining and giving examples to the reader so we could better understand the point he was attempting to get across to us. With all of these great aspects to the article, there are some weaknesses that draw the reader away from understanding the context. Sometimes, the author goes too deep into his argument and loses all focus, leaving the reader with an absent mind on what the

Open Document