Is Animal Testing Ethical?

1288 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Is animal testing ethical

Know that somewhere out there, there is hopeless animal behind bars. He is locked up and tested on, daily. Every day, needles are injected to him. He screams and tries to escape. He fights and struggles. After a while he loses hope and becomes saddened. Why is he going through so much suffering? He is going through the pain to test whether the medicine that is being given to him is being effective or not. Although the medicine could help with the treatment of a certain disease, the animal is feeling so much pain. However, he is not the only one going through this. Throughout the duration of the trial, many other animals just like him have died due to the consequence of it being effective from the start. Within the time that it took to modify the medicine and make it effective and presentable to the public, nearly hundreds of animals probably have died. If this seems bad, imagine millions of animals dying per year due to animal experimentation. So how can animals that are being put through this be an ethical act?
Ethics plays an important role in humans because humans have the intellectual capacity to differentiate between right and wrong. The objective of this argumentative piece is to determine whether animal testing is ethical or not. Animal testing includes, but is not limited to makeup and experimental experiments. Through scholarly research and examining case studies, the objective is to get a deeper understanding of animal rights and to what extend they are being violated if they are. Expert investigation and claims on ethical reasoning on it will be further reviewed as well. Ethical reasoning can be determined by several aspects, such as: utilitarian, rights, fairness, common good, and virtue. If applicable, those will be...

... middle of paper ...

...es of human skin, the results are more accurate. In addition to these technological methods, MRI and CAT scans, DNA sequencing, advanced microscopes, and x-rays all enable the medical world to look inside the human body ("Animal Experiments: Overview"). Although these alternative methods may be more expensive, money should not be the reason why lives of innocent animals are lost.
As seen by the aspects of ethical reasoning, animal testing can go both ways. Some may argue to prohibit animal testing while other may support and defend the cause of animal testing. However, the benefits are minimal compared to the disadvantages. Animals have the same rights as humans with respect to having the right to live. Animals should not be harmed for the possible cause of it being advantageous for humans. And lastly, there can always be alternative methods to get the same results.

Show More
Related

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.

    Read More

  • The Pros of Animal Testing

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is a subject appalled by many people. It is considered to be unethical, inhumane, and downright cruel. One of these reasons for the opposition of animal experimentation is due to the belief shared by many animal activist groups, such as PETA, that animals are kept in appalling living conditions in research facilities. Reasons to believe this are caused by minor instances of laboratories not abiding the law. However, despite these instances the welfare of test animals are preserved by many laws and regulatio...

    Read More

  • Opposing Views On Animal Experimentation

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal experimentation sends a different message to everyone. The two sides are made of those who think animal testing is beneficial for life and those who think it is unethical and wrong. Those who find these tests to be beneficial are consist of researchers, scientists, and other observers. People and groups who perceive these tests to be cruel and unethical, consist of animal rights activists and organizations that fight for animals rights, such as PETA and ASPCA. Though there are many differences between the two sides, there are also a few similarities. Examples of these similarities include the 3R’s concept and other laws that are fair to both sides. An example of a difference, is the fact that some people think testing leads to medical breakthroughs, while some people think otherwise.

    Read More

  • Is the Testing of Products on Animals Humane?

    1995 Words  | 4 Pages

    The ethics of animal testing has been debated about since the late 1800s. Human beings feel that they are superior to animals because of the animals’ incapability of reasoning or eloquently expressing themselves like humans can. Animal testing dates as far back as ancient Greek and Roman colonies when people would dissect animals for pure curiosity and the acquirement of knowledge. Vivisections, the act of operating on live animals, occurred later on. Realdo Colombo was infamous for performing vivisection on pregnant dogs. He would take out a fetus from the dog’s womb and torment her young offspring in front of her. Despite the pain the mother dog experienced, she would bark furiously and attempt to reach her offspring. When Colombo gave her the puppy, she would tenderly lick it. This clearly demonstrates that the mother dog was far more concerned about her pup’s condition than her own well-being. This experiment on the pregnant dog is a blatant example of motherly love, which begs the question: Why would a human mother not instinctively act in this way, too? As Jeremy Bentham states, “The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” (Evans). Testing on animals is inhumane and callous; consequently, it should be abolished.

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.

    Read More

  • The Harm of Animal Testing

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only brutally hurts them but it also denies the animals the rights they have.

    Read More

  • Medical Beneifits Of Animal Testing

    390 Words  | 1 Pages

    Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research. Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; also many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safe.

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing is a controversial topic with two main sides of the argument. The side apposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane; that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organism have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals. The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides apposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... often more reliable then animal test. In most cases, when scientist test animals it may work on the animals but does not always work on a human. Safer alternatives make it easier to not harm an animal and to always get reliable results.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, animal testing not only violates animals’ rights but also is not the best way to research. And the genes are different between animals and humans. Humans need to improve their ways to get the scientific experience and forbid animal testing in order to improve our lives and animals’ lives.

    Read More

  • Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?

    2169 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout centuries medical research has been conducted on animals. “Animals were used in early studies to discover how blood circulates through the body, the effect of anesthesia, and the relationship between bacteria and disease” (AMA 59). Experiments such as these seem to be outdated and actually are by today’s means, scientists now study commonly for three general purposes: (1) biomedical and behavioral research, (2) education, (3) drug and product testing (AMA 60). These three types of experiments allow scientists to gain vast amounts of knowledge about human b...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Animals and Medicine

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing has a positive past, but is extremely controversial. Many people agree and disagree with it. Modern society would be suffering from rare diseases without it, including tuberculosis and polio. Many companies, from cosmetic companies to home improvement companies test their products on animals. Many animal tests often require animals to be killed, and/or experience pain, discomfort, and isolation. Many countries around the world are looking to stop animal testing, and many alternatives that are cheaper, more accurate, and humane exist and are being improved. Animal testing is no longer needed in our world, as many cheaper, humane, faster, and more reliable alternatives have been discovered and may even improve, which can eliminate animal testing once and for all.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years animal rights groups and organizations have frowned upon animal experiments. Animal testing has been thought to be inhumane and cold-hearted to animals. Because of these accusations medical researchers have to suffer threats from individuals and the media. If animal testing weren’t allowed would that be a drawback in advancement in medical research? Animal testing is beneficial to people because these trails lead to improvements in medical research. Animal experiments have led to finding new cures and vaccines to fatal illnesses. Because animal experiments are helpful in making vaccines to prevent these sicknesses, these trails are the reason so many lives are saved. Animal testing is very necessary and useful to people, but animal rights groups believe that these trails doesn’t benefit humanity. According to Ellen Paul, “Breakthroughs in treating injuries, like practically all medical advances, depend upon experimentation on animals.” Animal experiments have given way to many new instruments to fight against diseases like cancer (Paul). For example, mice and other rodents contributed to scientists developing new tools for fighting different forms of cancers (Paul). Animal testing has helped science in many ways, but animal organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) believe that these experiments are cruel to animals. Even though most animals endure some sort of pain during these experiments, the results are very beneficial to people.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.

    Read More

More about Is Animal Testing Ethical?

Open Document