Is Affirmative Action Necessary

484 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: affirmative action policies

Is It Necessary? Affirmative action is a policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. It's something that shouldn't be used though. Yes, it is something that's going to help people out but at the same time those “disadvantaged” people can get to the place where the advantaged people are with hard work and dedication. Affirmative action should not be necessary because it seems that people just want an easy way to get somewhere they probably didn't work for. For example, a university may have 45% Asians and only 5% Native Americans, well the sad truth is that those Native Americans probably didn't work as hard and they many probably did not meet the standards of the university. …show more content…

Its suppose to give everybody equal opportunities but it seems to only discriminate mostly against white people. In 2009, a group of firefighters was unfairly denied for promotions because of being white.(listland) That's crazy because now the white people are being treated as minorities, yet we’re all supposed to be “equal”. What if there was one position left in a college and you were a white female that passed the standards but you didn't get in but it was given to a minority even though they were less qualified than you, that would suck so bad. We should focus on somebodies intellectuality instead of race. Definitely somebody will disagree with me, that's how the world is. They will probably have the argument that white people are so privileged and that they shouldn't be complaining if a couple minorities are getting ahead by easy access. But that's totally counter claimable by saying that we’re all supposed to be equal and nobody should be given easy points because of their race and we should focus on people's grades. There will always be arguments for things that shouldn't be so hard to understand. Affirmative action is a negative thing to be honest. People will use their “minority” label to gain access to undeservable places in life. It pretty much a nicer way to discriminate against an “advantaged” race. This is very important because people should get what they work for at

Show More
Related

  • Affirmative Action Helps Qualified Minorities

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    Critics of affirmative action often evoke images of qualified white males being denied jobs so that lesser qualified women and minorities might have them, all in the name of racial and gender fairness. But this is one of the worst myths about affirmative action.

    Read More

  • Hopwood Vs Texas

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    Affirmative action, while a great idea in the beginning, is no longer needed to make up for the past discrimination of women and minorities. It does not get rid of discrimination, but rather creates it towards whites and men. Any form of discrimination is wrong, whether intentional or unintentional. Businesses and universities will set aside a separate pool for minorities and women so they don’t have to originally compete against the whole pool of applicants. A person’s qualifications and how they got to where they are should not be questioned because of affirmative action. The only reason some people are still questioned or considered undeserving is because affirmative action still takes place. Getting rid of affirmative action in universities and businesses will eliminate reverse discrimination and ensure that their qualifications, along with achievements, will not be questioned based on the skin color or gender of a

    Read More

  • Reverse Discrimination Lisa Newton

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the past 15 years tremendous awareness has been raised around this and programs of preferential treatment emerged. These programs ensured equal rights for people of color and females in the work place, allowing for them to apply for executive level positions and earn the same amount of money, benefits, and prestige as a white male ensuring equality for all race and sex. Lisa Newton argues that, “reverse discrimination does not advance but actually undermines equality because it violates the concept of equal justice under law for all citizens. In addition, to this theoretical objection to reverse discrimination, Newton opposes it because she believes it raises insoluble problems.” Among them are determining what groups have been sufficiently discriminated against in the past to deserve preferred treatment in the present and determining the degree of reverse discrimination that will be compensatory. Newton outlines the importance of ensuring her argument is recognized as logically distinct from the condition of justice in the political sense. She begins her argument for reverse discrimination as unjustified by addressing the “simple justice” claim requiring that we favor women and blacks in employment and education opportunities. Since women and blacks were unjustly excluded from such opportunities for so many years in the not so distant past, however when employers and schools favor women and blacks, the same injustice is done. This reverse discrimination violates the public equality which defines citizenship and destroys the rule of law for the areas in which these favors are granted. To the extent that we adopt a program of discrimination, reverse or otherwise, justice in the political sense is destroyed, and none of us, specifically affected or no is a citizen, as bearers of rights we are all petitioners

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action: Giving Preferential Admissions to Minority Students

    1316 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Anyone interested in higher education should want to contemplate, on behalf of colleges and universities, students and faculty, alumni and paying parents, the fate of affirmative action(Chace, M William 20). The Oxford Dictionary states Affirmative Action is “an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education; positive discrimination.” In 1961, John F. Kennedy signed an Executive Order calling for “affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” This is now known today as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC). Affirmative action policies would later be forced upon businesses and have also been instituted at many universities where minorities are given preferred admissions over non-minorities. An Example of this would be at the University of Michigan where applicants who represented racial or ethnic minorities were given 20 points towards admission out of a 150 point system where only 100 points were needed to gain admission. Trying to put the 20 points in perspective, applicants with perfect SAT scores only received 12 points toward admission. This system was later struck down by the Supreme Court, but another similar policy was upheld at the University of Michigan Law School. With how diverse our society is currently compared to years ago, it seems to compliment that the policies have indeed worked. But now, the policies are questioned by many as whether or not they moral, constitutional, and/or...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action Encourages Racism

    398 Words  | 1 Pages

    From its points of origin, the intended use of affirmative action is to ensure that employees and applicants of jobs are treated equally regardless of their race, religion, and national origin. There is no question about this being the right approach. But, as mentioned in the article, when a company qualifies for government subsidies just for selecting a minority over equally qualified non-minorities, it's difficult to argue that affirmative action is working the way it's supposed to be.

    Read More

  • Racial Inequality in America

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s world, the American still has barriers to overcome in the matter of racial equality. Whether it is being passed over for a promotion at the job or being underpaid, some people have to deal with unfair practice that would prevent someone of color or the opposite sex from having equal opportunity at the job. In 2004, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporation was a civil rights class-action suite that ruled in favor of the women who worked and did not received promotions, pay and certain job assignments. This proves that some corporations ignore the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination based on sex, race, religion or national origin.

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action in College Admissions

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, affirmative action is “an active effort to improve employment or educational opportunities for members of minority groups and women.” However, despite its well-intentioned policies, it has been the source of much controversy over the years. Barbara Scott and Mary Ann Schwartz mention that “proponents of affirmative action argue that given that racism and discrimination are systemic problems, their solutions require institutional remedies such as those offered by affirmative action legislation” (298). Also, even though racism is no longer direct, indirect forms still exist in society and affirmative action helps direct. On the other hand, opponents to affirm...

    Read More

  • Free Affirmative Action Essays - Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

      It promotes the hiring and acceptance of less experienced jobs of the workforce and less able students.   Sometimes the affirmative action policies forces employers and schools to choose the best workers and less privileged students of the minority, in all, regardless of their potential lack basic skills.   As remarked by Maarten de Wit, an author who's article I found on the World Wide Web, affirmative action beneficiaries are "not the best pick, but only the best pick from a limited group."   Another article I found,  "Affirmative action: A Counter- Productive Policy" by Ernest Pasour also on the W.W.W., is one example which reveals that Duke, a very famous and prestigious university, adopted a resolution requiring each of it's department to hire at least one new African-American for a faculty position the 1993 date.

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action Should Not Be Continued

    2185 Words  | 5 Pages

    Affirmative action started in the 1960’s as a way to end discrimination against African American and later all minorities - including women. By migrating people of all color into workplaces and colleges/universities seemed to be the suitable solution to diversify our nation. Although blacks had been freed for a 100 years, they continually struggled with segregation. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned the segregation of all sort in the United States, however that was not enough. Congress mandated the affirmative action program as a plan of desegregation. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy made reference to this plan, but it was not until September 1965 that it was enforced by President Lyndon Johnson. The program affected federal jobs, to include federal contracting company, and universities. In order to receive federal funding, each entity had to hire and enroll minorities. Affirmative action was a good jump start to get our nation to where it is today. However, affirmative action should not be continued because it is a form of discrimination, it is more harmful than helpful, and it supplements race or gender for one’s qualification.

    Read More

  • Disparate Treatment

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    Disparate treatment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by laws in which all employers must comply, including fire and emergency services. Disparate treatment in the workplace is applicable to many functions of the workplace, including, discipline, promotions, hiring, firing, benefits, layoffs, and testing (Varone, 2012). The claim of disparate treatment arises when a person or group “is treated differently because of a prohibited classification” (Varone, 2012, p. 439). In the 2010 case, Lewis v. City of Chicago, six plaintiffs accused the city of disparate treatment following testing for open positions within the Chicago Fire Department (Lewis v. City of Chicago, 2010). The case is based on the argument that the Chicago Fire Department firefighter candidate testing, which was conducted in 1995, followed an unfair process of grouping eligible candidates, therefore discriminating against candidates of African-American descent.

    Read More

  • Is Affirmative Action still needed?

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...o help? The same arguments currently being used to defend Affirmative Action where the same arguments used more than 50 years ago to defend segregation. The schools and the general population admit that affirmative Action is selective discrimination. When white males are no longer the majority will they be eligible to take advantage of Affirmative Action or will the discrimination continue?

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action on Social Inequality

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    Social inequality, an issue that has been debated many times throughout the years, has discrimination, racism and sexism. Since people have to deal with this every day, social inequality seems like it will never disappear. However, society believes that their answer to solving this problem has been created, which is Affirmative Action. The purpose of affirmative action is to acquire more diversity and to control the basis of racism in America. This idea is to represent equality for women and minorities who work and are attending universities. For example, when applying to universities, they always ask about your ethnicity, depending on what race you are, you have the upper hand of getting into the school. This is how Universities are trying to bring more diversity and affirmative action is a great idea. However, looking at the sociological attributes to the idea of affirmative action, it does not seem like it is the best way to handle social inequality. In order for affirmative action to truly be a success in society, there are three aspects that need to be analysis: functional analysis (functionalism), conflict theory, symbolic interactionism. Through these three aspects, the advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action will be shown.

    Read More

  • Why Affirmative Action Should Be Eliminated

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine waking up tomorrow and reading in the local paper that the government was giving tax breaks to minorities in order to prevent discrimination. Congress insists that the deductions will “help level the playing field” in American society, claiming that diversity is necessary in creating an ideal nation, but is this attempt to prevent disparities and racism not an act of inequality in itself? By putting this policy into place, the government is giving advantages to minorities without showing the same generosity to Caucasians of the same economic backgrounds. Protests would be taking place around the country as citizens argue that the plan violates their Constitutional right to equality. Yet this is exactly the type of scenario seen in universities across the country. Colleges use race as a large factor in admissions in order to create “optimal diversity” among the students. However, this attempt at variety often comes at the expense of white and Asian students. For these reasons, affirmative action policies in college admissions should be eliminated in the United States.

    Read More

  • The Pros and Cons of Affirmative Action

    3452 Words  | 7 Pages

    Affirmative action or positive discrimination can be defined as providing advantages for people of a minority group who are seen to have traditionally been discriminated against. This consists of preferential access to education, employment, health care, or social welfare. In employment, affirmative action may also be known as employment equity. Affirmative action requires that institutions increase hiring and promotion of candidates of mandated groups. (Rubenfeld, 1997, p. 429)

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action Policy

    1310 Words  | 3 Pages

    An affirmative action policy is a policy that gives preference to a minority based upon the individual’s gender, ethnicity, race, or religious preference. In addition, affirmative action policies could take the form of lowering test scores for college admittance. Michael Sandel provides an excellent example of an affirmative action policy in his article Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do. Michael Sandel talks of a woman named Cheryl Hopwood. Cheryl Hopwood was a white woman whom was not affluent and was raised by a single mother (Sandel 2). Cheryl Hopwood had applied to the University of Texas Law School with a grade point average of 3.8 and with a score in the 83rd percentile for the university’s admission test (Sandel 2). Unfortunately, Cheryl Hopwood was not admitted due to the university’s affirmative action policy (Sandel 2). The University of Texas Law School gave preference to and admitted African American and Mexican American students even though their academic qualifications were either weaker or the same as Cheryl Hopwood’s (Sandel 2). Cheryl Hopwood later takes this case to court arguing that she was discriminated against, but the university replied by stating that “the law school’s mission was to increase the ...

    Read More

More about Is Affirmative Action Necessary

Open Document