Iron Triangle Project Management

737 Words2 Pages

Project management requires the measurement of several key data points, metrics and milestones during the lifetime of the project. These data points must be easy to read and interpret. The metrics or indicators used are of different types, qualitative, quantitative, leading, lagging, process, output and more. The measures1 must be collected, interpreted and implemented to enable the management and steering of the project. An important goal of project management is to choose a mix of project metrics such that the different stakeholders each get a precise overview of the project progress in an easy way (Kerzner, 2013)⁠.

According to a study evaluating project management performance methods, today the Iron Triangle approach for developing project …show more content…

The landscape of project management has changed. Project management is today more business oriented (Kerzner, 2013)⁠. This argument is supported by Yu (Yu, Flett, & Bowers, 2005)⁠, who present a value-centered proposal for addressing project success.
Any project is always done within a specific environment or a system. Therefore, a project needs to support something which is existing and needs to be integrated with other efforts and units. To evaluate a project success or failure, Wester developed an enhanced system to integrate more indicators for more complicated projects. His approach involved selecting relevant project Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of different types in order to meet the needs of different stakeholders and parties involved in the project. (Wester, 2013)⁠.
According to Kerzner, an indicator is only a Key Performance Indicator when three requirements are fulfilled:
1. First, key means it is a major contributor to the success or failure of the project.
2. Second, performance means it can be measured, quantified, and must be controllable to improve …show more content…

Second, how can project managers use these better metrics in communication with stakeholders with varying interests and objectives?

The initial literature review does not reveal information about additional metrics used by project managers. Examples:
1. Rotter evaluated a new model for project success criteria but has not mentioned metrics to steer a project (Rotter, 2014)⁠.
2. Morris reviewed the impact on performance with a case study from one company. According to this study, the project performance was improved because of additional project indicators (Morris, 2007)⁠. This indicates there are potential improvements possible.
3. Tennant & Langford researched potential benefits by implementing a new project scorecard with the data of existing systems (Tennant & Langford, 2008)⁠.

The author’s experience centers on the management of projects involving large installations of advanced technology in complex environments with many stakeholders. That experience indicates that different metrics, including KPIs and value-based metrics, are already applied in some

Open Document