International Life

Satisfactory Essays
In today’s world, interdependence among states, organizations, and people is escalating. Facilitating the growth of both cooperation and conflict, the effects of this globalization can be evidenced clearly. Some see worldwide integration hastening the establishment of a universal authority whereas others highlight the proliferation and emerging influence of non-state actors, such as the WHO, Apple, or the EU. Quote three can be associated with the former liberal perspective, as a global government, involving intense collaboration, is seen as both essential and adequate to address surfacing universal tribulations. This recognition of the complexity and broad expanse of dynamic problems accompanying globalization is wholly accurate, as is, the compulsion for a form of transnational action; however, a global government is not in the foreseeable future. Rather, the legitimacy and functions of nongovernmental organizations are likely to increase and the roles of sovereign states and intergovernmental organizations will be forced to drastically transform.
Within the context of regime theory, it can be concluded that non-governmental organizations, intergovernmental organizations, and transnational corporations will be highly relevant in the near future, replacing the roles of states in the form of international cooperation.
The dilemmas involving the environment and economics are two of the most compelling factors in international political relations between states. Ironically, these issues also validate the soaring importance of nongovernmental organizations. The consequences of environmental harms, underscore the collective action problem, also known as the “tragedy of the commons.” While self-interest is one ...

... middle of paper ...

...g influence of intergovernmental organizations, while a myriad of multinational corporations and nongovernmental organizations vividly color the landscape of international cooperation with the opportunity to address modern issues with innovative and relevant methods, unavailable to the conventional state. Nevertheless, states’ powers may expand in areas of traditional state aptitude, yet nongovernmental organizations are likely to compensate elsewhere. With this evidence, it can be concluded that the Westphalia system will continue only with drastic changes to the concept of sovereignty, reform of the procedures and organizations utilized by governments to meet obligations, and swelling influence and accountability of nongovernmental actors. Only the future will be able to provide the details of this changing system and its effects on the world’s inhabitants.
Get Access