Conflicts “We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199). This quote discusses one of my major beliefs which is the fact that everyone has to deal with both external conflict and internal conflict. Although this quote is talking about war, it symbolizes a greater meaning of the struggles of life. Xavier is struggling with the aspect of the war that requires him to kill other men in order to survive. He is dealing with the guilt that follows murder, but he also recognizes it is necessary. In the real world, every person struggles with internal doubts, feelings of sadness, and worry. These are usually a result of external conflict and events that are occurring in a person’s life. I believe that everyone is struggling, to a certain degree, with both internal and external conflicts. These conflicts work together, if a person struggles internally, they will have more external conflicts, and vice versa. The less internal and external conflict that a person has, the more peaceful and joyful their life will be. I chose this quote because the idea of suffering internally due to external conflicts is something that I can relate to on a very personal level. When I first read …show more content…
I used summer break as a period of time for self-reflection and this was my road home. As I separated myself from all of the external conflicts in life, I felt the same joy as I had as a child. My return with Elixir was when I returned to school in the fall with a new outlook on life. I surrounded myself with new people who made me feel good about myself and who did not initiate conflict. I was able to let go of most of my internal conflicts and I was able to recognize how what happens externally affects my internal attitude. I used this knowledge to help others through their conflicts as I know feelings are a result of
middle of paper ... ... When the enemy seeks to avoid battle, we attack! When the enemy retreats, we pursue!
According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to
Similarly, Xavier and Elijah from Three Day Road go through a path of losing love and friends eventually turning to enemies. To begin, Xavier and Elijah war quickly noticed by other comrades because of their hunting skills. Xavier and Elijah grew up with a native background where Xavier doesn’t see killing as an ordinary thing to do. This is seen when Xavier is being shot at for the first time. He witnesses how close it was for him to be killed, responding, “The other side wants to kill me, and I’ve never even seen their faces” (Boyden, 33). Much like Paul, Xavier share many similarities to show guilt, shame and innocence. Xavier as well as Paul, thinking for all his comrades and there service for the war. Showing how his culture has taught and raised him to do so. War gives soldiers the main purpose to kill, while for Paul and Xavier killing a human is not morally wrong. In addition, Paul, like Xavier haves regret and shame for all the comrades and enemies that they have lost. This causes them to go into a state of anger and guilt which they cannot control. This is seen after Xavier cannot think straight after destroying a base along with enemies, Xavier proclaims, “I replay it over and over in my head so that I don’t sleep all night, pulling the pin on my mill bomb, throwing it and watching it arc until it disappears into the crater, the concussion and screams. I have killed someone now” (Boyden, 75). Images of horror replay in Xavier head after he kills a group of men. It is shown that Xavier is attached emotionally to his victims. While most soldiers are alone and cannot express their feelings, this leaves these thoughts as a burden which can lead to insanity. However, Xavier finds love during the war which gave him hope again...
"There is one front and one battle where everyone in the United States—every man, woman, and child—is in action, and will be privileged to remain in action throughout this war. That front is right here at home, in our daily lives, and in our daily tasks."
For the great lesson which history imprints on the mind…is the tragic certainty that all wars gain their ultimate ends, whether great or petty, by the violation of personality, by the destruction of homes, by the paralysis of art and industry and letters…even wars entered on from high motives must rouse greed, cupidity, and blind hatred; that even in defensive warfare a people can defend its rights only by inflicting new wrongs; and that chivalrous no less than self-seeking war entails relentless destruction.
Conflict is constant. It is everywhere. It exists within one’s own mind, different desires fighting for dominance. It exists outside in nature, different animals fighting for the limited resources available, and it exists in human society, in the courts. It can occur subtly, making small changes that do not register consciously, and it can occur directly and violently, the use of pure strength, whether physical, social, economic, or academic, to assert dominance and achieve one’s goals; this is the use of force. Yet, with the use of force, the user of force is destined to be one day felled by it. “He who lives by the sword will die by the sword.”
...ause it seemed clear that wars were not made by generations and their special stupidities, but that wars were made instead by something ignorant in the human heart” (Knowles 201). This excerpt describes the ultimate idea of creating enemies, not in war but in human heart.
All throughout time and history people have been at war with each other at one point or another. War can, truthfully, at times be inescapable and considered by some historians as a natural instinct, an instinct that every human being possess. Throughout history mighty empires and governments have collapsed due to the damages inflicted on by a war, yet in spite of this, some have managed to face the odds and make it through, staggering along as if nothing happened. War is a true test of an empire or government’s determination to move forward, adapting using the knowledge and intellect they have acquired to their own advantage. Nevertheless, not all wars lead to fighting by physical means but instead it can lead to fighting mentally by opposing sides. One such example would be the non-traditional Cold War fought between the United States and Soviet Union. The Cold War was a time that caused an immense fear in the lives of many, and inspired novels such as 1984 by George Orwell, Alas, Babylon by Pat Frank, and essays such as “You and the Atomic Bomb” by George Orwell, which are just some of the voices from this terrible time.
In the town of Flatwater, tensions run high amongst the white farmers and the local Native Americans. Racism is abundant between the two groups, both taking shots at the other. In regards to this situation Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011) theory of Endogenous Conflict, which is when conflict happens within a group or community. Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011) states “It includes conflicts over changes, values, the distribution of desired resources, and authority” (pp. 61). The Indians are fighting with the farmers and the government over getting the rights back to their tribal land. The farmers are fighting with the Indians because they do not want to lose their land, which is their livelihood
Conflict theory is a perspective derived from the work of Karl Marx, who believe that society is a dynamic entity and it is constantly undergoing changes driven by class conflict, who holds different interests, ideas and values, for competing scare resources and aiming to maximize their own-benefits. According to the founder of conflict theory, Karl Marx, society are divided into two category: the have and the do not have, the latter is dominated by the former ones who are those people with power in hands and with the greatest political, economic and social resources. Conflict theory assumes that society makes the norms to serve the interests of the powerful.
This book is written from a perspective foreign to most Americans. Historically, American students are taught from a single perspective, that being the American perspective. This approach to history (the single perspective) dehumanizes the enemy and glorifies the Americans. We tend to forget that those on the opposing side are also human.
Imagine the rate of american rifleman shooting at the enemy going from 10 to 95 percent!(Tannen 1998). This states that america is getting more and more domesticated to attack other people and engage in more conflict then ever before. When I was growing up I was told that in order to solve a problem that another student had with me the only logic way would be to fight the person. My family members as well as friends would say that if you let anyone step over you that you were a cowards and that confronting the person would be the best thing for someone to succeed. This passage also states that we are desensitized to the pain and suffering of others. This goes true in society today when we see bullying and how it goes on in the world. For example Donald Trump just won the election and the way that people are reacting to the victory are very vulgar.
“To live anyhow is better than not at all” (Chekhov 1) , the short story, The Bet commenced with the conflict when the person had no choice but to choose between the death penalty or life in prison. The Bet was originally written by Anton Chekhov, a profound Russian short-story writer who concentrated a lot on human values and the reflection of the extravagantly selfish Russian nobility. And through The Bet he was able to express all those ideas in two sides, the banker and the lawyer with the conflict along the story line.
Realistic Conflict Theory As one of the oldest social psychology theories, the Realistic Conflict Theory deals with the conflict and hostility that is projected to arise between individuals or groups competing over the same limited resources. Therefore, as a resource, opportunity, or even goal, becomes harder to obtain, the amount of aggression is projected to increase as well. This theory is not only visible in many everyday situations, but it also establishes a basis for which discrimination and prejudice can be partly explained. The initial study of this theory was conducted in a three-step experiment.
Conflict avoidance is a technique used to deal with conflict. Avoiding conflict is mainly used to disregard the direct issue at hand. Avoiding conflict can be used to temporarily get rid of an issue or it can be used to permanently remove the issue. Avoiding conflict within the workplace most often results in relationship division. Workplace conflict is inevitable, meaning wherever and whenever there is a group working to accomplish similar goals as a whole, conflict will be present. Workplace conflict exists due to various factors. (Graham 2014) The most common seen factors influencing workplace conflict include role understanding, meaning who is responsible for what task, how tasks are to be accomplished, personality difference and poor