Interdisciplinary planning of care has been integrated into nursing practice over the years. Reaching consensus for treatment and goals for patients is when interdisciplinary care planning is successful and collaborative. The Joint Commission has conceptualized the care planning process. A structured framework for communicating will result in safe and effective practice (Keenan, Yakel, Tschannen, & Mandeville, n.d.). The purpose of this paper is comparing the design structure of research studies. Qualitative and mixed method studies were used.
Contrasting Research Approaches
Qualitative research is non-numerical, generally survey form and often includes open-ended questionnaires (ACET, Inc, 2013). Direct observation, focus group interviews, and written material were the collection methods used in the article Development of a patient-centered care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study written by Rosstad, Garasen, Steinsbekk, Sletvold, & Grimsmo (2013).
Mixed method studies combine both quantitative and qualitative methods. The article written by Atwal & Caldwell (2002) entitled Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration, chose data collection methods were a combination of stakeholder interviews, the qualitative approach, and inter-professional audits and variance analysis, both are the quantitative approach.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
Mixed method design incorporates the positives and negatives of both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative research has an advantage over other methods for reasons being it is efficient for gathering information (ACET, INC, 2013). Another advantage is quantitative design is less expensive due to less mo...
... middle of paper ...
...well, K. (2002). Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration?. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 16(4), 360- 367. doi:10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00101.x
Keenan, G.M., Yakel, E., Tschannen, D., & Mandeville, M. (n.d.). Documentation and the nurse care planning process. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians- providers/resources/nursing/resources/nurseshdbk/KeenanG_DNCPP.pdf
Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. (custom laureate ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams
Wilkins.
Rosstad, T., Garasen, H., Steinsbekk, A., Sletvold, O., & Grimsmo, A. (2013). Development of a patient-centered care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study. BMC
Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-9. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-121.
Tackett, J. L., Lahey, B. B., van Hulle, C., Waldman, I., Krueger, R. F., & Rathouz, P. J. (2013).
Tadić, A., Wagner, S., Hoch, J., Başkaya, Ö., von Cube, R., Skaletz, C., ... & Dahmen, N. (2009).
Woods J.K. (2001) The development of integrated health care models in Scotland. International Journal of Integrated Care. 1(1): 1-10
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Inc.
In healthcare today, it has become more apparent that evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential to incorporate into every facility, but nurse leaders have noted difficulties during the implementation process. Therefore, Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt recommend that practice changes should be guided by conceptual models and frameworks (2015). In order to effectively integrate EBP into facilities, eight models were created. Within this discussion, the Evidence-Based Advancing Research and Clinic Practice through Close Collaboration (ARCC) Model will be investigated (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).
Melnyk, B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). The seven steps of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(1), 50-53. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000366056.06605.d2
When performing evidence based practice research, the Iowa Model uses a team or individual approach to assist nurses in the journey to quality care. The Iowa Model begins by offering a process of selecting a proper clinical topic, which is often a recurring problematic issue (Polit & Beck, 2012). This topic is formulated as a question to improve a technique or procedure. Once the researcher determines that an ample amount of reported investigation exists on the desired question, information may be gathered and presented for approval (Polit & Beck, 2012). The research may lead to a gradual change in nursing practice.
Laushey, K. M., Heflin, L .J., Shippen, M., Alberto, P. A., & Fredrick, L. (2009). Concept
Van Den Bos, J., Rustagi, K., Halford, M., Ziemkiewicz , E., & Shreve, J. (2011). The $17.1
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Pankratz, V. S., Leibson, C. L., Stevens, S. R., & Harris, M. (2011).
Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2013). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kozier, B., Erb, G., Berman, A., Burke, K., Bouchal, D. and Hirst, S. (2010). Fundamentals of
Corner, J., 1991, ‘In search of more complete answers to research questions. Quantitative versus qualitative research methods: is there a way forward?’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 718-727.
Barker, V., Giles, H., Hajek, C., Ota, H., Noels, K., Lim, T-S., & Somera, L. (2008).