Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
United States and China relationship
Liberalism international relationship
The impact of international relations in perspective on liberalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: United States and China relationship
Introduction Sino-U.S trade relationship becomes a main concern as it shows economic interaction between the world largest economy and the second largest economy. After China joined World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, there is a sharp increase in economic performance. Therefore, the Sino-US trade relation from 2001 to 2011 will be explored in the following sections. Generally, Sino-U.S relationship is peaceful in terms of interdependence liberalism. In terms of Marxism, it is an asymmetrical relationship. Application of Interdependence Liberalism in Sino- U.S. trade relation Interdependence Liberalism Karrbo and Ray (2010) define Liberalism as “a theoretical perspective emphasizing interdependence between states and sub-state actors as the key characteristic of the international system” (p.6). International affairs are applied by strong faith in reason and rational principles (Toru, 2013). Long run cooperation is preferable because of mutual interest (Toru, 2013). For Interdependence Liberalism, it is believed that interdependence reduces inter-state conflict. During the process of modernization, the level of interdependence increase. Trading increase interdependence among state that economic interdependence leading to political integration and peace (Toru, 2013). The costs of using force increased and the benefit decreased that military force become a less useful instrument of policy (Toru, 2013). States are more concern with economic and social affairs. They cooperate together to achieve some goal. The economic dependence between international actors is mainly reflected in the volume of trade between the actors, the number of foreign investment, import and export accounted for the proportion of GDP, net capital flows amo... ... middle of paper ... ...of the wages. Labors need to work under military management. They are suffered from high pressure. Therefore, there a more than 20 workers committed suicide these years (SACOM, 2011). From the evidence mention above implicates Sino-U.S trade relationship is asymmetrical. China cannot get sensible return under U.S lead world-capitalist system. Upward mobility is reduced which limits development of China. Conclusion To conclude, Sino-U.S relationship is a peaceful. But world capitalist system creates core-peripheral relationship which makes U.S is on the higher stage while China is on the lower stage. China is unable to deal with it. This causes conflicts between China and U.S. However, under the prevailing world trend of pursuing peace, Both China and U.S will try their best to deal with economic conflicts by soft means. Status of China will be improved in future.
Two conflicts nearly every American knows are the conflicts between what was the USSR and the conflict with China. The Cold War lasted from 1947 to 1991. This war between the United States and the Soviet Union resulted in an arms race and space exploration (History.com Staff). Additionally, conflict with China and America is still current and relevant in the U.S. as we need to understand the basis of our conflict before we can really do anything about it. While the conflict between China and America isn't just based in the conflict between Capitalism and communism, it is still important to understand these differences and how they affect us (Joseph
Sitting close to the edge of being a “developing” and a “developed” country, China is a difficult country to define neatly. It is a country with an ancient and traditional culture trying to position itself higher within the international community. Plus it is also a communist country that has come to embrace its own form of capitalism to fuel its economy. China’s economic boon has been beneficial to many people within the country. But not to all people within China evenly.
In order for countries to cohesively overcome international barriers, frameworks of ideal political standards must be established. Two of these frameworks constantly discussed in international relations are the theories of Neo-realism and Liberalism; two theories with their own outlook at the way politicians should govern their country as well as how they should deal with others. Neo-realism lies on the structural level, emphasizing on anarchy and the balance of power as a dominant factor in order to maintain hierarchy in international affairs. In contrast, Liberalism's beliefs are more permissive, focusing on the establishments of international organizations, democracy, and trade as links to strengthen the chain of peace amongst countries. Liberalism provides a theory that predominantly explains how states can collaborate in order to promote global peace; however, as wars have been analyzed, for example World War II, the causes of them are better explained by Neo-realist beliefs on the balance of power and states acting as unitary actors. Thus, looking out for their own self interest and security.
In conclusion realist and liberalist theories provide contrasting views on goals and instruments of international affairs. Each theory offers reasons why state and people behave the way they do when confronted with questions such as power, anarchy, state interests and the cause of war. Realists have a pessimistic view about human nature and they see international relations as driven by a states self preservation and suggest that the primary objective of every state is to promote its national interest and that power is gained through war or the threat of military action. Liberalism on the other hand has an optimistic view about human nature and focuses on democracy and individual rights and that economic independence is achieved through cooperation among states and power is gained through lasting alliances and state interdependence.
The United States and China share the most imbalanced bilateral trade relationship in the world. The United States imports more goods from China than it exports to a tune of $202 billion dollars each year. All told, China alone accounts for nearly 26% of the United States' $725.8 billion trade deficit. “Increasingly, this imbalance has been the subject of a major political backlash within the U.S. congress, where some have charged that the US is destroying its industrial base to support a communist country's industrialization." http://worldnews.about.com/od/china/a/china_trade.htm
All three countries have political, economic, and national security issues involved and the United States and China are both in competition economically and militarily to be the greatest superpower in the world. All three countries have vowed to defend their national interest militarily; however, the prospects of going to war for any of the three are perilous indeed and the conflicts between China and Taiwan have continued into the early 21st century. .
From the beginning of their establishment, the bilateral relations between the United States of America and China have changed throughout the time. The bilateral relations between the two countries emerged in the 1970’s with the ‘Ping-Pong’ diplomacy and there have been many pauses in their mutual relations. The US and China enjoyed cooperation in economic and military spheres and the mutual relations grew massively during until the end of 1990’s. The heads of the two states began visiting each other’s countries and the economic ties were tightening year by year. However, the issues of human rights and free speech declined mutual Sino-American relations.
However, the structure and process of international relations, since the end of World War II, has been fundamentally impacted through an immense growth of a variety of factors at multiple levels, which leads to the liberalist theoretical perspective of global complex interdependency. The complex interdependency is constructed from the liberalist theoretical perspective emphasizing interdependence between states and substate actors as the key characteristics of the international system (Ray and Kaarbo 7), which means that cooperation can be made more te...
Since the initial warming of U.S.-China relations in the early 1970’s, policymakers have had difficulty balancing conflicting U.S. policy concerns in the People’s Republic of China. In the strange world of diplomacy between the two, nothing is predictable. From Nixon to Clinton, presidents have had to reconcile security and human rights concerns with the corporate desire for expanded economic relations between the two countries. Nixon established ties with Mao Zedong’s brutal regime in 1972. And today Clinton’s administration is trying to influence China’s course from within a close economic and diplomatic relationship.
Liberalism has contributed to the understanding of International Relations as an academic discipline and through organizations such as the United Nations, the European Union, the League of Arab States, and others in what many consider to be a very influential manner.
Finally, the United States political system has a strong structural structure but in China their people always work together to be the best and stand out in the world. It is predicted that China will one day be the largest economy-growing country in the world. They continually grow and rebalance their world to be the best. The growth of the economy will depend on the Chinese government's comprehensive economic reforms that more quickly accelerate China's transition to a free market economy. Consumer demand, rather than exporting, is the main engine of economic growth; boost productivity and innovation; address growing income disparities; and enhance environmental protection.
China is one of the main viable candidates as this century’s new world power. Today, it maintains a strong economic stance within the international market, and is expanding at a rapid pace. The United States cannot maintain its position as hegemon for the rest of humanity; just as how ...
The study of international relations takes a wide range of theoretical approaches. Some emerge from within the discipline itself others have been imported, in whole or in part, from disciplines such as economics or sociology. Indeed, few social scientific theories have not been applied to the study of relations amongst nations. Many theories of international relations are internally and externally contested, and few scholars believe only in one or another. In spite of this diversity, several major schools of thought are discernable, differentiated principally by the variables they emphasize on military power, material interests, or ideological beliefs. International Relations thinking have evolved in stages that are marked by specific debates between groups of scholars. The first major debate is between utopian liberalism and realism, the second debate is on method, between traditional approaches and behavioralism. The third debate is between neorealism/neoliberalism and neo-Marxism, and an emerging fourth debate is between established traditions and post-positivist alternatives (Jackson, 2007).
In the race to be the best, China is clearly outperforming the United States. China has strong economic fundamentals¬ such as “a high savings rate, huge labor pool, and powerful work ethic” (Rachman, Gideon. "Think Again: American Decline). Their economy has grown an astonishing 9-10% over the past thirty years; almost double of what it used to be decades ago. China is also the “world’s greatest manufacturer and its greatest market” (Rachman). The continuing growth of China's economy is a source of concern for not only the U.S. but surrounding nations as well. One could argue that the U.S. need not worry about China’s growth because of the spread of globalization and that western ideologies would influence China to turn to democracy. Yet China has still managed to “incorporate censorship and one party rule with continuing economic success” (Rachman) and remains a communist country. Hypothetically, even if China does resort to a democratic state, this does not gua...
China has also expanded their trading industries with countries such as South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, ASEAN, India, Russia and Hong Kong. This has not satisfied the Chinese greed for income as they also export and import goods to American countries, name...