Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structural functionalism
Symbolic interactionism
Structural functionalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Structural functionalism
Viewing the World “Sociologically” When people view their world and society, they use their own individual worldview, which significantly impacts whether they have a negative or positive outlook on the world around them. In sociology, this worldview becomes evident as the person applies one of the three sociological perspectives in examining society. These three sociological perspectives (structural functionalism, the conflict theory, and symbolic interactionalism) are distinct from each other and seek to describe society as it truly exists by means of interactions and structure. In the structural functionalism perspective, one sees the world as a machine, made of intricate and unique parts all functioning for the benefit of the whole. Kimberly …show more content…
This theory examines society as a complex collection of relationships and beliefs among people (Claerbaut, 2004). These relationships among people consist of the core of society. According to this perspective, society could not function without them. In regards to how people interact in their relationships, Boundless.com states, “The basic notion of symbolic interactionism is that human action and interaction are understandable only through the exchange of meaningful communication or symbols. In this approach, humans are portrayed as acting, as opposed to being acted upon.” Ashley Crossman further describes the symbolic interactionalism perspective by …show more content…
I believe each person in society has a certain task he must fulfill in order to keep society functioning. In my family, each person has a specific task that he must complete in order to keep our family running smoothly. My mother homeschools my four younger siblings, and my father works outside the house and provides for the family financially. Each of the children also has an assigned role he is responsible for. This system of roles and tasks is also evident outside our household. For example, in a company, a variety of people must fill specific positions in order to keep the company stable. One must fill the position of president or CEO and make the majority of decisions in the company (Hanly, n.d.). In addition to the president or CEO, a manager must preside over a group and communicate and assign certain positions to other employees (Hanly, n.d.). Furthermore, a group leader surveys work production and efficiency (Hanly, n.d.). Lastly, the general employees perform the majority of labor. Without people performing their specific roles in the company, the company will fail to be efficient and
Structural Functionalism is the sociology theory that emphasizes how everything and everyone has a purpose in society. That each and every one of us is a puzzle piece that comes together in order to form a society, any missing puzzle piece would result in the downfall or shortcomings of the whole society. Whether this may be religion, education, economy, etc, all of these structures much work together in order to have a flourishing society where everyone works uniformly. Stability is achieved when everyone fulfills their duty is society.
Sociology cannot be clearly explained as there are many different theories and theorists; so far none of them have been defined as a correct answer. Although with all this information of theories and theorists sociology is relatively explained as agreed philosophies that delivers a reason for human society. Sociological theories are like most other theories, they are selective, and there is no quantity of theory to explain everything or define the infinite amount of information that exist or comprehend the methods of observing reality. Sociological theories vary and can be linked to each other according to various criteria. The two main perspectives of sociology are the micro sociological approach and the macro sociological approach. The micro sociological approach is based more on the persons being capable of their own independent thoughts feelings and behaviour; therefor society is built through their interactions amongst each other and the significances they attach to them. This approach is defined using Social Action Theory and Symbolic Interactionism. The Macro Sociological approach is on a much bigger scale and consists of a person being born into a current society which will then shape their behaviour. It centres on the organisations, values and the culture of that particular society and how it impacts an individual and their role in life. This approach is made clearer using Functionalism, Feminist and Conflict Theories.
Sociology is the study of society and the interactions that occur within society itself. There are numerous methods of analyzing societies and the way the function, nonetheless, most methods fall in micro and macro level theories. Micro level theories allow sociologist to study smaller relationships such as individual or compact groups of people. On the other hand, macro level studies permit for larger scale investigations to take place. With both of these theories there are three theoretical perspectives used in sociology. Micro level theories include symbolic interactionism which focuses in interactions done with language and gestures and the means which allow such interactions to take place. Macro level theories include structural functionalism
There are many ways in which an individual is able to view the world and the three sociological perspectives, conflict theory, structural functionalism, and symbolic interactionism, represent some of these ways. These theories are an important part of sociology and help individuals put the world into their own perspectives and then draw conclusions about how society works as a whole. Once a person is able to do this, they are able to make sense of their interactions and the interactions of others, due to the reasons set forth by their sociological perspectives (Claerbaut, 2015, “Theoretical Perspectives of Sociology”).
The symbolic interactionist perspective is one of the main sociological theories used. It is analyzed on a microlevel and states that how people define a situation becomes the foundation for how they behave. This theory has two parts to it, the significance of interactions between two or more individuals, and the significance of symbols. Symbols are people’s means of distinguishing and defining themselves from other people. A few examples of symbols are hand gestures, money, written languages, and clothes. Symbolic interaction transpires when individuals interact through the utilization of the symbols. An example of symbolic interaction is when people in a neighborhood give the individual(s) that have just moved into that neighborhood food
The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they
When discussing about the unit of family, the neighborhood or the community at large, there are many sociological theories which can explain how things are shaped in these units. In my view, the most important sociological theory which explains how the things work out within the family, neighborhood or community level is interactionism. This essay will first highlight the main concept of the theory of interactionism and how it can be used to explain the main dealings within the family neighborhood and community level. It will then go on to highlight the main way in which this theory of interactionism best fits to highlight the overall population of the United States. According to the theory of interactionism, the most basic of all components of the human realm is that of communication. It can entail communication between the mind and the body and it can also entail communication between various humans. The main key concept of this social theory is that the other social processes within the society are all dependent on this main theory. This means that the s...
In symbolic interaction we communicate with other people through roles that we assign to them, the way we label them, or how we act in accordance to what this person symbolizes to us. Often we assign labels, or roles to other people by knowing them from before. It is focused on individual interactions with other people, things or the events. One thing can symbolize one thing to me, but it can mean something else to another individual. Since we view the same thing differently, we will interact towards that thing or individual in different ways. An example of this is, rainy day for my kids means fun in the water, walking through mud, and just enjoying the day. To me the same rainy day means, lots of dirty clothes, mud all over the floor. It is important to remember that someone’s symbolic interaction can change. It is fully focused on micro sociology, only focusing on interactions between individuals. It states that we interact and change according to our prior experiences and interactions. Two sociologists that are identified with this theory are Max Weber and George Mead. Action depends
Functionalism considers society responsible for behaviour rather than individuals so focuses on how they fit within society rather than how people operate. Functionalists believe society is structured to operate like the human body, each part has different functions to have an overall effect, termed organ analogy. The theory suggests society is split into different parts, such as the family, people within it have varying levels of importance and alternative social identities, duties or responsibilities, for instance a mother as a family carer. It is thought teaching socialization using collective consciousness, shared beliefs, morals and attitudes makes people cooperate, unite and agree on behavioural rules, v...
Sociologists view society in different ways. Sociologists use three major theories: symbolic interactionism, functional analysis, and conflict theory. The symbolic interactionist perspective, also known as symbolic interactionism, directs sociologists to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other (Cliff). Some examples of symbolic interactionism are the meaning of marriage, the meaning of divorce, the meaning of parenthood, and the meaning of love. Symbols may include wedding bands, vows of life‐long commitment, a white bridal dress, a wedding cake, a Church ceremony, and flowers and music. American society attaches general meanings to these symbols, but individuals also maintain their own perceptions of what these and other symbols mean (Cliff). Symbols have a shared social meaning that is understood by all members of society. Symbolical interactionism is analyzed at a micro-sociological level. It examines small-scale patterns of social interaction. It focuses mainly on face-to-face interaction and how people use symbols to create a social life.
There are three main types of sociological perspectives in which you can perceive different sociological issues and concepts; structural-functional, symbolic-interaction, and social conflict. Structural-functional looks at society as a whole and how it works together. Symbolic-interaction is how different symbols spark particular thoughts and emotions by examining the meanings that people impose on objects, events and behaviors. Social conflict studies how power and coercion affect social order. Based off these types of perspectives, an analysis on teen depression and suicide can be evaluated from a sociological standpoint.
Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.
The structural-functionalist perspective looks at society as a complex system composed of various parts much like a living organism. Each aspect of society contributes to society's functioning as a whole. Social institutions play a key role in keeping a society stable. All societies need certain things to survive (Newman 2010).
Using functionalism to break down a social problem can be useful in trying to see the perspective functionalists use when they are finding the causes of that specific problem. One specific social problem, such as crime in America, can be broken down to see what the causes of this specific problem would be. There is one theoretical perspective that can be helpful in explaining deviance within a society. One of these theoretical ideas is Merton’s strain theory. This theory says that deviance is caused by a discrepancy in cultural goals and the tools that people have to help achieve these goals. Cultural structure is where certain goals are created that people want to meet, and social structure
Before taking this class, my understanding between each individual and the whole society is that every individuals as the gear are connected together to become a society like a machine. That is, human beings build the society. However, the class gave me bigger view of the relationship between the people and the society. Discussing about the relationship between me and the broader social world is based on how all human beings and the broader social world effect together. Thus, I am going to show my understanding from the class and reading about the interaction between each individual and the whole society.