Integrated Theory Paper

First, the integrated theories involve connecting, linking, combining, synthesizing the relations and fragments of other theories into formulations of crime and crime control that are more comprehensive, which combines the concepts and central propositions such as social disorganization, anomie, learning, and social control within the same discipline. (Critical Criminology, 2009) The purpose of the integrated theories is to produce a theory that is superior to any theory individually. The integrated theory takes several forms according to Delbert Elliott (1933), who “contend that social disorganization, strain, and inadequate socialization combine weaken conventional bonding and strengthen delinquent bonding” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 147). Therefore, the likelihood of social control of one’s association with delinquent peers is high, which increases their likelihood of delinquency. Nevertheless, when a person levels of social control experience strain, it began to

(Bohm & Vogel, 2011) According to the integrated theory, people commit delinquency as a result of interplay from both opportunity and motivation, which involves both these characteristics amount of control exposed to and not exercised. Charles Tittle (1939), explains four factors of integrated theory, which included predisposition from person to person, provocation or the situational stimulant of verbal insults, challenges, or display of weakness of delinquent motivations, and opportunity and constraint that the likelihood of delinquent behavior will activate a restraining response by others. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) However, when these factors are combined delinquency is less likely to occur; therefore, if control is imbalance the greater delinquency and if control is balanced people