Integrated Couple Therapy Model

713 Words2 Pages

A strength that I had was that I maintained myself focused on the relationship instead of siding with one member of the couple. As the reported their perspectives on the presenting problem, I was able not to blame one member or alienate with one of the members. Validating each partner’s experience without invalidating the other partner’s one is relevant to build a therapeutic alliance (David, 2014, p. 65). I focused on trying to find ways to move towards the healing of the relationship instead of alienating with one couple’s member. According to feedback from my peers, I did well being present with the couple and facilitate the engagement of the couple in therapy. Another strength that I believe I had was that I was open minded, coming from …show more content…

I attempted to engage the couple on beginning to think about solutions to their problems, such as compromising. I also kept using reflection of feelings to demonstrate empathy in order to build trust and a therapeutic alliance. Building a therapeutic alliance is one of the main tasks in the integrated couple therapy model during the first sessions (David, 2014, p. 65). Therefore, building a therapeutic alliance was valuable to the work with the couple. Meanwhile, one weakness that I had was that I did not have a clear understanding of what it was expected from me as I did the session. The goals of session that I was provided were, in my opinion, vague. Thus, I was unclear on how to approach the couple. I felt anxious and confused because I did not know the expected outcome. An example about being unclear was when I tried to present the assessment feedback to the couple. I was confused by what information I should be presenting. Thus, I missed on presenting to the family relevant information that the assessments provided such as Jane’s sadness and Charlize’s …show more content…

Getting details is a therapeutic intervention to clarify vague statements that clients make (De Jong & Berg, 2013, p. 26). Getting details help therapist and clients to be more clear and specific about generalized statements. This intervention elicits descriptive clarifications (De Jong & Berg, 2013, p. 26). Getting details is used to help clarify and amplify clients, goals, strengths, and success (p.26). I missed opportunities to get details about the couple’s feelings. If I got details during specific times such as Charlize’s feelings of frustration when Jane demands her, the couple would have been more specific about the goals that they want. The main weakness that I have is that from my perspective, the couple’s presenting problem is an easy solvable problem. I do not perceive the couple as a challenging case. Thus, I used solution focused techniques to attempt to solve quickly their presenting problem. Introducing specific tasks for the couple to work on would have been helpful. But, I did not do it because I wanted to get to the core of the problem and solve

Open Document