The majority of foods in the schools around the United States are junk food. The food a child consumes at a school is usually fattening and can lead to diseases mentioned before. Another problem with a child not eating properly is not receiving the vitamins and minerals he/ she desires. A change that was made to provide healthy lunches is to give the students one cup of fruits and a decent meal size. Schuna has done research as to why the lunches are a major health concern and she discusses ways to resolve and/ or prevent these health issues.
The deviation from social norms approach to defining abnormality is a relatively basic way in relation to the other definitions however the effects of cultural difference are probably most profound in this approach. This approach defines abnormality by the way people behave in relation to normal practices. Therefore this method assumes that if a person is abnormal they will behave in a way not considered normal by other people in that society. This approach is therefore limited by varying cultures as what is considered as normal behaviour in one area could be considered to deviate from the norms elsewhere. This is a rather significant problem in that in the modern multi-cultural societies someone may consider what they are doing is totally acceptable but those around them may.
The flaw in this argument is that if students and their parents want their child to eat unhealthy foods, they can pack them in their lunch and bypass the schools health rules completely. By banning fast food at school, students have the right to eat in whichever manner they please, and may bring whatever they hunger for themselves. So basically if banned, students will bring their own fast foods anyways. If that were to be the case then the school would have to let them eat what they bring from home, but the school can’t afford to be an incorrect example in nutrition to the majority of the student population. As educational entity a school is, it should always work towards what benefits the most of its students and pupils; they should point to what really is beneficial for the majority.
This shows that institutions do not control people; we can make our own decisions. (Structuration) My person opinion is that I do not believe either of these theories; I believe that society can often have restrictions on how we behave although it is our decision what we do. There is a theory that argues this case too. The Structuration Theory, it combines both the social structure and the social action theories. Anthony Gidden's defined it, he notes that `social life is more than random individual acts, but is not merely determined by social forces.'
The goal is to learn the purposes and consequences of practices and behaviors of the group being studied, instead of judging cultural practices and social behavior as good or bad. This term does not require that social scientists accept all the beliefs and behaviors of the societies they study. Some behaviors or idea from other cultures can be difficult to understand, being tolerant and understanding is not always easy. It can be difficult to maintain when we 're confronted with cultures whose practices or beliefs conflict with our own. Though imposing these values on people with a different culture is ethnocentric and, therefore, has become controversial.
Informal social control can be very casual in enforcing social norms by using body language or other forms of discipline, however formal social control is carried out by authorized agents when desired behavior is not obtained by informal sancti... ... middle of paper ... ...ements. Yet, everyone in our society will result in developing their own perspectives on deviance and social control. Works Cited LISKA, A. E (2001). Social Control. In Edgar F. Borgatta & Rhonda J.V.
Our school needs to create a more enjoyable lunch period for the students. To improve the students of South Western Senior High School’s lunchtime, our school should improve quality of food, gain new payment ideas and pick up new procedures of lunch. First off, the largest issue in our school when it comes to lunch is the quality and the amount of the food we are fed. Have you ever heard of “Pink Slime”? Pink Slime is ammonia treated meat filler that schools in Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia and Texas serve to their students.
Knowing each other’s financial standing causes fear of teasing and bullying. Schools use embarrassing tactics such as calling out dues to children while in lunch lines and handing out copies of the bill daily. This diminishes student participation further due to embarrassment. This makes it easier for children to distinguish what families are financially stable and which ones struggle. The stigma about receiving free lunch in the public school system exposes them to teasing, bullying, and being called poor by their peers.
Schools around the world have different opinions toward junk food, to either provide it in schools or not. Many students do not qualify for school meal programs which leads to students to eat unhealthy junk food during lunch. If schools really want to stop child obesities, schools need to find a way to allow all students to be accepted for meal plans. It’s not fair for those students who do not get to eat a healthy lunch on a daily
Deviance is the interference of the social norm in a given culture. The deviance in the cultural setting has its cons and its pros in many communities in the society. The meaning of deviance varies from one society to another, but the general meaning is not following the norms that have been established by the culture. Abnormal behavior in one society appears normal in the other society (Nairne, 426). Deviance is weighed by the society’s reactions to the particular behavior, also it is measured by the society’s way of life so that it defines the unwelcoming behavior.