Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theme of insanity in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Insanity is defined as the derangement of the mind, insane foolishness or irrationality. When committed a crime the felony is either considered innocent by reason of insanity or guilty, but what classifies one from the other? In “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl it is debatable whether or not the main character Mary Maloney is innocent or guilty after the death of her husband Patrick Maloney. After fully analyzing the story, Mary Maloney is an innocent victim of insanity proving this through her oblivious states of mind.
The first way that Mary Maloney showed an oblivious state of mind is by drinking. Being as healthy as possibly while pregnant is very important for the development of a healthy baby. Not only did Mary not realize her wrongdoing by drinking while twelve months pregnant, but it did not even seem to
…show more content…
Yes, it is human nature to forget things, but is it normal for a woman to forget the meat she just killed her husband with cooking in the oven? While searching the house for any possible weapons police officer“Jack Noonan walked into the kitchen, came out quickly, and said, "Look, Mrs. Maloney. Did you know that your oven is still on, and the meat is still inside?" "Oh," she said” (Dahl 358). Jack Noonan’s action of walking into the kitchen helps readers once again realize Mary Maloney is innocent by the reason of insanity because nobody in the right state of mind would forget about the weapon they used to kill their husband. The only other logical reason would be that Mary forgot due to alzheimer 's which comes from old age, and Mary clearly was not old considering the fact she was about to have their first born child. A person’s state of mind is key in developing who they are, what they have done, and why they have done it. These key components can help anyone who has read “ The Lamb to the Slaughter” develop a complete understanding for the real Mary
First, “Lamb to the Slaughter”, Mary Malony. She killed her husband when he said he was going to leave her and her baby all alone. I guess she couldn’t bare the thought of him leaving her all alone like that so she just killed him with their dinner. “At that point, Mary Maloney simply walked up
Desperation is a state of despair,where someone will act in an extreme way. These extreme behaviours can lead to actions that cannot be taken back. In Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter” Mary is a kind and loving person before she is in a state of desperation. Mary’s actions are an example of how desperation can transform people forever. Mary is kind and loves her husband very deeply. Mary’s love for her husband is displayed when “ Mary Maloney was waiting for her husband to come home from work. Now and again she would glance up at the clock, but without anxiety, merely to please herself with the thought that each minute gone by making it nearer the time that he would come.”(Dahl 10) Mary loves Patrick very much and
In Lamb to the Slaughter, Mary Maloney, doting housewife pregnant with her first child, commits a heinous crime against her husband. After he tells her that he is leaving, she become distraught and strikes him in the head with a leg of lamb. Afterwards, Mary...
With murder charges of fifteen people, cannibalism, and necrophilia hanging over his head, Jeffery Dahmer plead not guilty by reason of insanity. Since Dahmer was a child he had shown withdraws and avoidance of society. He had a habit of collecting dead animals, and he would dissect, dissolve them in many different ways. When Dahmers plea of insanity was rejected by the court, he was then charged with fifteen counts of murder (Yoong). Many believe that when Jeffrey Dahmer 's plea was rejected that it was the end of anyone using, but that isn’t the case. It is used quite rarely, but it is still in use. In all reality, the insanity plea should always be rejected. The only way it should be allowed is if the criminal is fully innocent. “The insanity
Insanity. Criminal responsibility or not guilty by reason of insanity can be evaluated through the MMPI-2. The validity scales that show if an individual is responsible by responding; knows the difference between right and wrong; or determines if the individual cannot respond to an incident the individual is accused (Walters, 2011). Bobby was aware of what he was doing, knows right and wrong; but Bobby still suffered from a mental illness. The ...
Insanity is being lost, is being incapable to decide between right and wrong. We are all insane. We are ignorant to believe we’re normal. No one is normal, and no one is perfect.
Life. Life is what gives you the ability to think, to speak, to breath and to be a part of this world. It is worth more than any amount of money, your life is priceless. Without it, we would seize to exist; our world would be utter darkness. Honourable Judge, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, today Mary Maloney stands on trial before you. A woman who took the away the life of not just an innocent citizen, but her very own husband. She was thought to be an ordinary women, a typical housewife and a soon to be loving mother. However, the facts presented before you today conclude that Mary Maloney was not just an unordinary detective’s wife, but also a murder. On April 13th 1953, the life of Patrick Maloney came to a tragic end because of leg of lamb in the hands of Mary Maloney. For the following reasons, Mary Maloney, wife of the deceased, is guilty of 1st degree murder.
What is "insanity" and why is this subject of much controversy? Although I do not have a clear definition of insanity, most socially recognized authorities such as psychiatrists, medical doctors, and lawyers agree that it is a brain disease. However, in assuming it is a brain disease, should we link insanity with other brain diseases like strokes and Parkinsonism? Unlike the latter two, whose causes can be medically accounted for through a behavioral deficit such as paralysis, and weakness, how can one explain the behavior of crimes done by people like Hinckley? (2)
As an archetype of a 1950s housewife, Mary Maloney left her house in order to fix a proper dinner for her husband. She traveled the short distance to the grocers for vegetables to fix with the leg of lamb she had recently put in the oven. She carried on a normal conversation and acted like nothing happened. The text says, “Keep things absolutely natural and there’ll be no need for any acting at all,” (Dahl 383). Mary Maloney is telling herself, before she leaves her house, that she needs to act in order to make it seem that everything is normal. Why tell herself to be normal if there was nothing to be abnormal about? She knew that she killed him and had to put on a show in order to convince them of her innocence. As mentioned before, eye witness’ are a key part of solving crime. By acting, she was able to gain a witness who would speak in her favor. Also, the detectives say, “ … acted quite normal … very cheerful … wanted to give him a good supper … peas … cheesecake … impossible that …,” (Dahl 384). These are partials from the statements that the grocer, Sam, gave to the detectives. This is another account revealing the fact that Mary Maloney was able to successfully handle herself in the most conventional way. Generally after a murder, especially of one’s partner, the spouse is very emotional and struggles to speak. Only after she returned from the grocer did she show emotion, and this was very little. These actions are very abnormal. Due to the fact that she showed little emotion or feelings after the murder and carried on regular speech, the murder was premeditated. Premeditated Murder, according to The Legal Information Institute, is “the planned or intentional murder of another,” (Carlson). Mary Maloney knew that she unlawfully killer her husband, Patrick, because of the unconventional actions she performed after the
When someone commits a crime, he or she may use mental illness as a defense. This is called an insanity plea or insanity defense. What the insanity defense does is try to give the alleged perpetrator a fair trial. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The problem is where do we draw the line. Under what circumstances is a person considered insane, and when are they not? The trouble with the insanity defense in recent years is the assumption that virtually all criminals have some sort of mental problem. One important point is that the crime itself, no matter how appalling, does not demonstrate insanity. Today, the insanity defense has become a major issue within the legal system. If the defendant is clearly out of touch with reality, the police and district attorney ordinarily agree to bypass the trial and let the defendant enter a mental hospital.
Literary Theme Essay Roald Dahl’s eerie story, “Lamb to the Slaughter,” is a cold and thrilling fiction which is based on Mary Maloney, a cruel and wicked psychopath who kills her husband and easily gets away with it. The naive police do not suspect her because she was the victim’s wife. Hence, the main idea popping out in this creepy and cold story is the ineffectiveness of judging people based on their position, situation or appearance. Ever since the police and detectives arrived at Maloney’s house to investigate, they’ve been exceptionally considerate to her. They offered an unusual kindness that might have not been given to everyone in the same situation as her.
Insanity is a legal, not a medical definition. This makes mental illness and insanity correlate with each other, only some mental illnesses are consider as inanity. Insanity includes not only the mental, illness but also mental deficiencies. There are major problems in exactly how to apply a medical theory to legal matters. Every crime involves a physical and mental act and the non-physical cause of behavior. The mens rea is the mental element that would be required for a crime, if it is absent it excuses the criminal from criminal responsibility...
When Roald Dahl used repetition to add to the scare factor in his short story, “Lamb to Slaughter”. Throughout the story he used repetition to emphasize things. Like when he repeats “They always treated her kindly.” and “The two detectives were exceptionally nice to her.” It was to emphasize that they treated her as the victim rather than a suspect. The repetition used made me curious when reading the story. Whenever I saw something repeated, I asked myself ‘Why would they do that?’ I became intrigued and wanted to read more and find out. By repeating, Roald created suspense and anticipation for the reader to get to the climax, prompting the reader to keep reading. In conclusion, repetition definitely made the story scarier.
In the story “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl, Mary Maloney is shown to have a very sinister and manipulative character. In the beginning of the story, Mary Maloney was a normal, loving and caring pregnant housewife that loved and cared for her husband, Patrick Maloney, very much. Earlier at the start of the story we see Mary was waiting for her husband to come home from work. She had set up the house with two table lights lit and plates on the dining table so they can have a very romantic dinner when Patrick comes home. When Patrick came home, Mary was very excited to see him. She would try to offer him some drinks and insisted she would get things in the house he needed so he didn’t have to get up himself. The countless times that Patrick said no to her offers and helpful doings, she still tried to serve and tried to make him feel comfortable and relax after work.
The definition of abnormal will be reviewed in relation to each defence. In order to identify how these three defences compare and contrast, it is first important to understand their definition and application. The appropriate defence will be used once the facts of the cases have been distinguished and they meet the legal tests. The legal test of insanity is set out in M’Naghten’s Case: “to establish a defence.of insanity it must be clearly proved that, at the time of committing the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” To be specific, the defect of reason arises when the defendant is incapable of exercising normal reasoning