Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
short notes on gender bias
an esaay on punishment
an esaay on punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: short notes on gender bias
The Justice system seeks to prevent crimes and to capture those who have committed crimes. But what are the causes of crime, maybe poverty, or greed, or is sometimes caused by the system. Is the risk worth the reward and is reward the worth risking the punishment? Power and influence is threaded deeply into the Criminal Justice System. Are all offenders caught and processed with the same demeanor and given the same punishment? The system needs to be impartial to all offenders regardless of the offender’s social position, job or yearly income. The general punishment for most crimes is incarceration in most states with a difference in duration to adjust per each crime. This is the deterrent against crime. This is what should be keeping people from committing a crime. When comparing the reward and the punishment criminals should be realizing that it’s not worth it. The punishment is itself is flawed, once incarcerated, a person is branded a criminal, job interviews, travel, everything will be more difficult for the criminal. Incarceration rates of both men and women have been increasing every year. If a deterrent is working, incarceration rates would be dropping rather than increasing, yet instead of changing and creating a better deterrent, the Justice system keeps using a flawed system.
Racism and prejudice a problem that the Justice system has been experiencing for centuries. People can’t help but be racist or to hold some prejudice, everyone is racist and prejudice to some degree, it all depends on our surroundings as we grow and mature. Racism and prejudice will cause the system to prosecute the wrong people. Even if the offender is guilty, this can cause the system to keep arresting the wrong people in hopes of catching the ri...
... middle of paper ...
...//jimkinmartin.com/2012/01/10/large-california-traffic-ticket-fines-effective-01062012/>.
2. "Bureau of Justice Statistics prisoners in 2012 - Advance counts." Bureau of Justice Statistics prisoners in 2012 - Advance counts. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
3. "Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)." Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
4. " Arrests by Race and Age: 2009 " . N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
5. "Lancaster district judge Kelly Ballentine not cleared yet." LancasterOnline. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, and Jeff Manza. "State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 2010." The Sentencing Project News -. The Sentencing Project, 20 Aug. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics. n.d. 13 February 2012 .
Sampson, Robert J. and Janet L. Lauritsen. 1997. "Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Crime and Criminal Justice in the United States." Crime and Justice 21:311-74. doi: 10.2307/1147634.
Wu, J. (2011). Citizenship status, race , ethnicity and their effect on sentencing. El , Paso Texas: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
Third negative issue facing multiculturalism in criminal justice is racial profiling. Police officers are often criticized for disproportionately targeting minority drivers in an attempt to uncover drug trafficking (Baker,2015.pg.311).
In modern-day America the issue of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system is controversial because there is substantial evidence confirming both individual and systemic biases. While there is reason to believe that there are discriminatory elements at every step of the judicial process, this treatment will investigate and attempt to elucidate such elements in two of the most critical judicial junctures, criminal apprehension and prosecution.
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad
...King, R., and Mauer, M., (2007). The Sentencing Project. Uneven Justice: State Rates of Incarceration by Race and Ethnicity. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/rd_stateratesofincbyraceandethnicity.pdf
The criminal justice system, like any system designed by human beings, clearly has its flaws. (Ben Whishaw). There has been numerous occasions that have showed the flaws of our justice ststem from convicting a person of a crime in ehich they did not commit, to the wrongfull execution of an innoncent person. Although the United States justice system was created to serve and protect the American people being fair to all, it continues to show evidence of the flaws within the system.
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the year 1980 we had approximately 501,900 persons incarcerated across the United States. By the year 2000, that figure has jumped to over 2,014,000 prisoners. The current level of incarceration represents the continuation of a 25-year escalation of the nation's prison and jail population beginning in 1973. Currently the U.S. rate of 672 per 100,000 is second only to Russia, and represents a level of incarceration that is 6-10 times that of most industrialized nations. The rise in prison population in recent years is particularly remarkable given that crime rates have been falling nationally since 1992. With less crime, one might assume that fewer people would be sentenced to prison. This trend has been overridden by the increasing impact of lengthy mandatory sentencing policies.
Today our world is filled with crime. The people committing these crimes must have a consequence for their illegal actions. The system in place to keeping everything fair and safe is called the criminal justice system. This was put in place to ensure there is fairness and justice served to people who break the laws set up by the government.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (1998, Dec.) National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
A well-established fact in criminology is that crime rates vary throughout a community center largely on where offenders live (Gore & Pattavina, 2004). Research completed by Shaw and McKay in the mid-1900s found that juvenile offenders were more likely to live in areas characterized by economic disadvantage, residential instability, and ethnic heterogeneity (Gore & Pattavina, 2004).
The 2012 Statistical Abstract. Us Department of Justice Census Bureau website. U.S. Census Bureau. December 23, 2011.
The present system of justice in this country is too slow and far too lenient. Too often the punishment given to criminal offenders does not fit the crime committed. It is time to stop dragging out justice and sentencing and dragging our feet in dispensing quick and just due. All punishment should be administered in public. It is time to revert back to the "court square hanging" style of justice. This justice would lessen crime because it would prove to criminals that harsh justice would be administered.