Women and men both have equal rights but women are not force to join the military at the age of eighteen. Men should grab a seat because women in this generation are no longer housewives or stay at home moms. Women say they are ready for some action to! As time has passed women have become equivalent to men not just by joining the military but in other work filled as well. Women can get the job done just like a man sometimes better than a man. With that been said women should be treated equal in the military. Selective Service Act which excludes women from having to sign up for draft, this Act gives the president power to select people for war. If a man don’t sign up for Selective Service he would not be able to get a job, he could be fine, or even given prison time.
Since the creation of the Selective Service Act of 1917, the role of a woman has evolved from the common role of a housewife, teacher or nurse. Now women have access to and are equally able to join many different career fields that were once gender based. The case Rostker v Goldberg 1981 debated whether or not women should be excluded from the Selective Service Act. Congress came to determine that “since women are excluded from combat roles in the Armed Forces, then they are not similarly situated for the purpose of the draft (Rostker, 1981)”. According to the Army Times in 2012, “The Army will start placing women in as many as 14,000 combat related jobs (Tan, 2012)”. So now, women are able to pursue combative careers in the military.
The United States Selective Service System offers on its Website a short history of the draft with respect to women. The primary reason given for non-registration of women is a Supreme Court decision, Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981). Simply stated, it says that since all men registered with the Selective Service are considered combat replacements, and since Congress forbids women to go into combat, women should not be registered. Of course, this reasoning is absurd, since it presupposes that absolutely every male called for involuntary military service will be used exclusively for combat, and conversely that absolutely no male called will be used for the approximately 90% of military jobs which are non-combat related.
...nuary, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army General Martin E. Depsey announced to demolish all unnecessary gender based barriers to service. On May 15, 2013, all U.S. military forces had to submit plans to end the rule excluding women from critical ground-combat units. “Women have shown great courage and sacrifice on and off the battlefield, contributed in unprecedented ways to the military’s mission and proven their ability to serve in an expanding number of roles,” Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta said. “The Department’s goal in rescinding the rule is to ensure that the mission is met with the best-qualified and most capable people, regardless of gender.”(“United State Department of Defense”, #12). Women have the same reasons to fight for their country as their male counterparts. In the end women bring craft, effectiveness, and innovation to the force.
One belief is that women are not able to fulfill the required fitness standards because of their smaller size. Another belief is that women do not have the same endurance as men. Over the past 14 years the men and women of the United States have been fighting together in the war against terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. The dynamic war on terrorism has no clear front lines and many women have been involved in direct combat with the enemy even though they are not formally able to serve in combat job rolls. According to US military expert Rod Powers “about 114 women have made the ultimate sacrifice in the war on terrorism” (Powers, R. (n.d.)). Many women have proven themselves physically capable of fighting and winning against the enemy in many job rolls across the armed forces. Women continue to prove their worth by keeping up with their male counter parts. Most recently, 2 women graduated from the grueling Ranger school on Aug 21, 2015 (Lamothe, D. (2015, September 2). If a women is able to meet the standards for a combat related job she should be able to serve in that roll. Although many women have proven themselves physically capable of serving in combat rolls there are some people that believe women should not be allowed to serve in combat job rolls because of the physical
As claimed by Major Eleanor Taylor,” Women have to be able to be given the same opportunities as men...in order to have the same opportunities they have to be exposed to the same risk.” In other words, Major Eleanor taylor asserts that women in the army should be put into the same danger as men while in combat especially front line duty. Even though some people believe women are not physically or emotionally stable, women should be allowed to fight in combat because women who are physically capable of serving in the military are easier to recruit and a gender force makes the armed forces stronger.
Throughout history, women have always played a vital role in the military especially during times of war. In the United States military, women’s service, dates all the way back to the Revolutionary War. Women have acted as nurses, seamstresses, spies and cooks. They took care of the wounded, brought food and water to the troops, some even dressed as men to fight side-by-side with their husbands on the battle field. Women have fought and died for their country trough military service. Many women are currently serving on the front line as medics or with support units. They encounter the enemy and handle themselves as well as any male soldier. But there is a price to pay for the choice to fight alongside men in combat and unforeseen consequences
Throughout history women have proven themselves capable of serving in the military. Women have shown that they do play very important roles in each branch of the military. They’ve done many different types of the jobs, anywhere from nurses to snippers. They can be more useful than men in certain situations. In today’s world women should be given the same opportunities as men, including active combat roles.
Women have been honorably serving in the military for decades. The current wars of this generation are unlike any others fought in the past. Technological advancements have changed the way many jobs are completed, making them more mechanized and less strength-dependent. The Iraq war involved more driving and less walking. According to Alvarez (2009), "Iraq has advanced the cause of full integration for women in the Army by leaps and bounds. They earned the confidence and respect of male colleagues" (p.1). Today's service women are still held back from deploying in a combat role by an outdated Department of Defense policy released in 1994. Despite...
Lastly there are some concerns that society has about women in combat. It is implied that men can endure a lot of strenuous physical activities were as a woman may not. For example, there may be an issue were a fellow solider may need to be carried to safety, a woman opposed to a man will probably not be able to handle this strenuous task, and because of that standard may have to be lowered to accommodate female applicants, therefore making it easy for anyone who might not be fit to fight in combat roles accepted into those positions. There is also a fear that women can be captured by the enemy and be tortured. This a fear of both men and women but because women are at risk of encountering a misogynistic enemy the chances of rape goes up.
Women have been in the military, or associated with combat for decades. “The most famous example of the ability of a woman to not only be involved in combat but to lead forces is that of Joan of Arc's legendary battles leading the French army when she was just a teenager.”(Gerber 1) Women have been involved in espionage and even posed as male soldiers during the Civil War. Conflicts such as, WWI, WWII, Panama, and as recent as our current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan women have served with distinction in many ways. In our most recent conflict, over 100 military women have given the ultimate sacrifice. Today with changes in our society and the global environment in which we live two controversial arguments arise concerning women in combat. Basically the debate whether or not women should be allowed to participate in direct combat or not. As our society and cultural beliefs change so does what we except as social norms. Both sides of this argument bring many reasons for and against allowing women to participate in direct combat. Taking into account both views of this controversy it will show, that not only a social change has occurred, but the dynamics of the battlefield has in fact already placed female service members into direct combat.
Some people say that women should be in the draft because nowadays, men and women should be considered equal. With the advancement of equality in the American society, these people argue that the armed forces should not be excluded from the growing new reputation America is trying to get. Hence, those who support women being apart of the draft argue this point. According to “Update: Women in the Military”, women have become way more involved in the army (1). From this, supporters of women joining the draft argue that their involvement in the draft should also reflect on their increasing involvement in the army. However, those who are opposed women being apart of the draft argue that equality within men and women is an unrealistic mindset. This is proven in the New York Times with Catherine Rampell’s when she writes “Women earn 92.2 cents on the dollar of what men earn” (1). This is a statistic from 2011 that shows people that complete equality between men and women has still not fully been reached. Furthermore, those opposed women and the draft argue that if America has not completely reached full equality within the genders, then neither should the army. Both of these articles bring up good points about why women should either be in the draft or not in the draft.
Women are not as strong fighters as men are. Drafting women will create a weaker military because they are not built to fight against men. Some women are physically capable of being in the military but the majority are not.
When it comes to being in combat I believe that women and men should have the same opportunity to do whatever they want in the military. So therefore, I agree that women should participate in combat. I believe that a woman is capable to do anything that a man can do physically and mentally. If I was in combat and had to fight with a person of a different gender I would not mind it at and would treat them just like another person I fight with. If someone is willing to give their life for our country I’m all for it does not matter their gender or race. As you read “All Guts, No Glory” by Molly M. Ginty you will see that women have made great sacrifices for their unit they served in and for our country. A women that is willing to go to the front
Many of these people fear that the standards that are set for women to enlist in the army are too low and that they will not be able to perform on satisfactory levels on the battlefield. The dominant argument is that women are not capable of the same physical feats as men. This argument is expressed in an article, The Truth About Women in Ground Combat Roles, written by Daniel Davis, he states, “There are currently no women in the National Basketball Association, the National Football League, Major League Baseball, the National Hockey League or other professional sports leagues. The reason for their absence has nothing to do with discrimination but is flatly rooted in the fact women biologically are not able to perform physically to the same level as men.” (Davis, 2016) Though, it can be argued that some men are not physically fit enough to go into war, and even with training would not reach the same physical peak as other men. If the worry is about having people who are physically fit enough to go into war, this cannot be controlled if the Selective Service System is used. Although there are certain physical requirements in place, it has been found that when drafts were previously used the standards of physical fitness were severely dropped so they were able to accept more men. All in all ending the use of the Selective