Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pharmaceuticals industries analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pharmaceuticals industries analysis
Pharmaceuticals has become one of the most important industries attributing to the well beings and lifestyles of the world’s populations. From treating, diagnosing, curing, and preventing of diseases, pharmaceuticals companies are providing their consumers with options of relief from illnesses. Unlike many other industries, pharmaceuticals was able to increase growth during the recent economic downturn, which further shows the demand that pharmaceuticals command from society. Although the public is the end-user of all products, before the consumer gets the product, there is only a couple of options on how it makes it way to the public. A pharmaceutical company will either sell it to a wholesaler, a pharmacy benefits manager, or to a pharmacy or store directly, depending on the size of the company. For example, a retail store like Wal-Mart, will command enough business to get the product exactly from the manufacturer. However, a company like your local hometown pharmacy, will have to get there product from a wholesaler to receive a better price than they would get buying directly from a manufacturer. The biggest wholesalers are McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, and Cardinal Health. Stores like Walgreens, CVS, Walmart, and other supermarkets also buy directly from the manufacturer. A pharmacy benefits manager, like Caremark or Express Scripts is an intermediary between manufactures and pharmacies, usually the customers insurance is obligated to go through certain pharmacies according to the PBM. Pharmacy Benefits Managers are there to negotiate better prices for insurance companies.
According to the World Health Organization, the global pharmaceutical industry is a $300 billion industry, a figure that is expe...
... middle of paper ...
...regulatory authority. The FDA is the agency in the US a manufacturer would go to with a description of the drug and the results of the clinical trial. After approval, then the company will gather additional data on effects of long-term risk and benefits. This stage can go on for several years until the manufacturer feels the drug is completely safe for everyday use. According to research done my Lawrence Lord (2011), R&D expenditures have a positive correlation in the amount of profitability a firm will be able to make. Even though R&D is costly, it is a necessary cost that a company must be willing to risk to have an edge on the competition. After all the time and money is spent on developing the drug, the other difficult is spending money to market the drug. Before being able to sell your first pill, the company has already risked at least $1 billion dollars. The
Bargaining Power of Buyers. This is the most concerned force because many companies in the drugstore industry start to do the same thing as Walgreens.
In order to sustain the market share in this highly competitive industry, the pharmacies have to establish and maintain strong working relationships with PBMs that have power to divest particular clients from a pharmacy by denying reimbursement privileges to their customers. Buyer Power Strong It is not hard to obtain the same drugs from different sources, so the customer loyalty is virtually non-existent and the pharmacies have to try extremely hard to sustain their consumer base. Threats of substitutes Weak There are very few alternatives to drugs. Alternatives are practically limited to traditional medicine.
The Industrial Revolution was a booming age for the United States that, though it brought many improvements in technology, caused many controversial events to take place.. Through the story Life in the Iron-mills, Rebecca Harding Davis proves the negativity of the factories from the Industrial Revolution. She proves this from personification, symbolism/metaphors, and also visual imagery. Rebecca Harding Davis proves through her writing, that the effect of industrialism in not pretty.
In America today, many people are in need of medical help. In fact,the Federal Trade Commission estimates that 75% of the population complain of physical problems (Federal Trade Commission 9). They complain, for example, of fatigue, colds, headaches, and countless other "ailments." When these symptoms strike, 65% purchase over-the counter, or OTC, drugs. In order to take advantage of this demand, five billion dollars is spent by the pharmaceutical industry on marketing each year . This marketing, usually in the form of advert...
Pharmaceutical benefit managers process prescriptions for the groups that pay for drugs, usually insurance companies or corporations, and use their size to negotiate with drug makers and pharmacies. This latest deal continues the consolidation trend but also highlights how the industry is becoming more than just an administrator and negotiator.
Why do consumers purchase specific drugs for various ailments, sicknesses or diseases they might have? Why do physicians prescribe certain drugs over competitive drugs that may be available to the public? Why is it that most of us can easily name specific drugs that fit the many ailments of today’s society? On the surface the answer might be as simple as good TV advertising or radio commercials or even internet adds. The truth of matter is the major pharmaceutical manufacturers own the patents on these drugs and this gives them all of the marketing budget and muscle they need to promote the drug and control the pricing. The incentives for larger pharmaceutical companies are very enticing and as a result, they don’t mind spending the time in clinical trials and patent courts to get their drugs approved. Some will even get patents on the process by which the drug is manufactured, ensuring that no competitor can steal the drug or the process. This protects their large financial investment and nearly guarantees a large return for their investors. Many consumer rights groups claim this is nothing more than legalizing monopolies for the biggest manufacturers.
Has anyone noticed that there seems to be a drugstore being built on every corner these days? Revco, Walgreens, and Rite Aid seem to be just a few of the drug store chains that are expanding. One has to wonder if this has anything to do with the possibility of including medicine under coverage by healthcare systems. This means that they may become part of a capitated payment system to the pharmaceutical providers. "By capitation, we mean a prospective payment to physicians or providers - either individually or as a group - of a fixed amount of money to care for each patient (Pearson, 1998)." In other words, every physician is provided a set sum of money whether they see any patients or not and every pharmacy would be given money whether they prescribe any drugs or not. Drug costs will rise.
In the business of drug production over the years, there have been astronomical gains in the technology of pharmaceutical drugs. More and more drugs are being made for diseases and viruses each day, and there are many more drugs still undergoing research and testing. These "miracle" drugs are expensive, however, and many Americans cannot afford these prices.
The point at which they decide to produce will rest on their own adversity of revenue, risk and effort. The company also needs to know the price elasticity of the curve: the greater the price elasticity, the more a company such as Pfizer will struggle to establish high prices and a high volume. Although monopolies appear damaging at times, there are arguments that they are an advantage to society. Monopolies in the pharmaceutical industry drive companies to pursue research and development (R&D) efforts to gain new patents. According to a 1992 study, among the 24 U.S. Industry groups, pharmaceuticals dedicated 16.6% of their amounts to basic research, while all other industries averaged at 5.3% (Sherer 1307).
For a drug to get to market it must go through several stages of research and development (Abbott and Vernon). Starting with discovery research, preclinical testing on animals, three phases of clinical trials on humans, and finally FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approval (Abbott and Vernon). Out of several thousands of drugs only a few will make it to the FDA approval stage (Abbott and Vernon). Testing is a highly regulated, time consuming, and expensive process. From beginning to end the process can take fifteen years and less than one of five compounds will make it to market where it is still not guaranteed to succeed (Abbott and
both the benefit and risk of all medication before approval.. In addition, FDA makes the labeling
America’s current system of education is in peril. If we can surpass or eliminate the industrialized mindset that the educational system has been built upon since the nineteenth century, we can once again realize the true nature of education – the acquisition of knowledge and skills needed for the betterment of ourselves and our society. As it stands now, the method of education is part of a hierarchical system, where the most useful subjects for work and those which will amass the most wealth are emphasized over all else. President Obama’s latest plea for education reform brought the call for an increase in funding for math and sciences. Granted, this will provide our country with the necessary skills to better compete internationally in an increasingly technologically focused world, however, what this call lacks is an emphasis on the cultivation of critical thinking which is only found in the humanities. The academic disciplines of philosophy, literature, history, and the arts which have for centuries been the key to the progression of our civilization are becoming merely supplementary to the insular approach toward the expansion of capital. This is most troubling because what we are taught is inevitably what we will become.
10. Collis, David, and Troy Smith. "Strategy in the Twenty-First Century Pharmaceutical Industry:Merck&Co. and Pfizer Inc." Harvard Business School, 2007: 8-12.
Other companies cannot replicate the drug and therefore they are forced to either wait until the patent expires or they must find an alternative drug that carries out the same purpose.... ... middle of paper ... ... It is clear to see that there are many pros and cons to patents in the pharmaceutical industry.
This week’s case study concerning Genzyme’s strategic direction was very interesting in that they essentially pursued a strategy that seemingly was purposely avoided by other players in the pharmaceutical industry (Schilling, N.D.). Their strategy centered on developing prescriptions for rare diseases. Typically “developing a drug takes 10 to 14 years and costs an average of $800 million to perform the research, run the clinical trials, get FDA approval, and bring a drug to market,” and in turn it is normally intuitive, from an economic standpoint, to attempt to develop drugs that will have a substantial market so to be able to assure enough revenue is generated to produce a significant profit. In turn, drugs marketed towards treating